Originally posted by AbuMubarak
View Post
By asking those 3 questions you clearly have a different definition of what a "follower" is.
His ideology is still existent today, as in his principles are still taught. The fact that you're mentioning his works gives credence to that. I don't understand why you're so adamant that people don't follow this man and his ideology, when you are literally quoting his works that people read and follow.
Why do I have to refute anything he says, when there are already threads created about him? One minute you complain that this person is obsessed with him and it's spamming the forum, and the next you're asking someone to post more stuff about him? Why don't you address the issues that have already been brought against him by Abu Sulayman? It's not like he's making this stuff up, he's quoting books from the movement and from people who lived at his time. If it isn't true, refute it?
Truth is, you know it's true, but it's an uncomfortable truth. And the only way you see fit for addressing it, is by trying to pressure people into not mentioning the controversial things, the killings etc ... but just stick to the stuff that everyone can agree on.
Comment