Originally posted by AmantuBillahi
View Post
Look we need to get past the semantics, what the Asharis mean by the Zahir implying kufr is that the real meaning, that a person would describe or that which is found in a dictionary, is kufr if you were to affirm that for Allah. For example a hand is a limb made of flesh, bone ect, obviously if you affirm this for Allah it is kufr. What the Hanbalis and Salafis mean by Zahir is different, this is why even today they falsely accuse each other of tajseem and ta'teel. Let's leave out the strawmans, we should know better than this.
Originally posted by AmantuBillahi
View Post
So you say that there is a difference between what I have highlighted, could you explain how somehow who makes tafweed of the Zahir would have a different view to someone who affirms the Zahir but negates change in the general sense? Please outline the differences that would result from this, because this is really what I'm trying to understand.
Originally posted by AmantuBillahi
View Post
Comment