Ads by Muslim Ad Network

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

JUSTICE OF UMAR r.a. upon his own son

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • JUSTICE OF UMAR r.a. upon his own son


  • #2
    Re: JUSTICE OF UMAR r.a. upon his own son

    Two words...Umah (RA) and injustice just do not go together.

    An amazing read. :jkk:
    ...and InshAllah i remind myself before i remind others.

    ASPIRE to INSPIRE before you EXPIRE!

    Is your Boss coming?...Click here :D

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: JUSTICE OF UMAR r.a. upon his own son

      A truly amazing read. A source/reference wouldn't go amiss though.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: JUSTICE OF UMAR r.a. upon his own son

        Originally posted by IHavNoKnowledge View Post
        A truly amazing read. A source/reference wouldn't go amiss though.
        I would say the same......

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: JUSTICE OF UMAR r.a. upon his own son

          Jazakallah for that!:up:

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: JUSTICE OF UMAR r.a. upon his own son

            Assalamu 'Alaikum,
            Jazak Allah Khair for sharing this virtuous historic event with us. I didn't know about this event before. I was searching on the net for details after hearing about this for the first time from one of my friend. I have read few other posts in different forums and found some differences in narration of the event.
            When I read your post it sounds like Umar (pbuh) first came to know about this event from a Jewish women and Abu Sahmah (pbuh) was silent on the questions from Umar (pbuh) which means he didn't want to admit or didn't have courage to admit what he has done.
            But according to the other post it was quite opposite. I am pasting it here so that others can read as well. Only reason I am sharing it is because that narration actually shows not only Umar (pbuh) was a just ruler, his son was also a true believer and respectful to the Islamic justice.


            Mawlana Amin Ahsan Islahi has pleaded to this hadith in one of his discussions on the same topic which forms part of his book Islami Riyasat (The Islamic State). I believe that the authenticity of this narrative may not be that forceful for it does not appear in the main sources. It should be taken as one of the historical narratives that are often considered and explained if they do not out rightly contradict the basic sources.

            Following is the extract from the book Islami Riyasat:

            Once his son, ‘Abd al-Raḥmān, drank and become inebriated. Later on, he presented himself before ‘Amr b. al-‘Āṣ, the governor of Egypt and confessed his crime. He requested the governor to sentence him to the prescribed punishment. ‘Amr b. al-‘Āṣ (rta) says: “I tried to dismiss ‘Abd al-Raḥmān after a little rebuke. But he insisted that if he was not sentenced according to the sharī‘ah, he would go back to Madīnah and complain before his father. I feared that if I let him go unpunished he would go directly to the caliph and report to him who would instantly dismiss me. This made me punish ‘Abd al-Raḥmān in my house. Later on he shaved his head off in a corner of my house. I did not inform the caliph about this issue. But after a few days later the following letter from the Caliph reached me.

            This is from the chief of the believers, servant of God, ‘Umar (rta) to the Sinner son of the Sinner. Your have baffled me by daring to break the promise. I believe you deserve removal from governorship. You dared to implement the punishment on ‘Abd al-Raḥmān in the yard of your house and to shave off his head under your roof. While you well know that this kind of leniency is not my attitude. ‘Abd al-Raḥmān was but one of your subjects. You were obliged to deal with him the way you deal with the ordinary subjects. But you have dealt with him considering him son of the Caliph. While you know that, with regards to justice, I do not show leniency to any. Now I order you to send ‘Abd al-Raḥmān instantly to Madīnah so that I can make him taste what he did.[1]

            ‘Amr b. al-‘Āṣ (rta) says: “Afterwards I sent ‘Abd al-Raḥmān to the Caliph and confessed that I had committed a great mistake by punishing Abd al-Raḥmān inside the walls of my house while I would not deal with other Muslims and the dhimmīs this way. I sent a written confession and ‘Abd al-Raḥmān under the custody of ‘Abd Allāh b. ‘Umar (rta).” Since ‘Abd al-Raḥmān was not allowed to use but a saddle on the back of his conveyance he could not move easily over his mount. When they reached Madīnah, ‘Abd al-Raḥmān b. ‘Awf (rta) tried to intercede with the Caliph. He requested the Caliph to forgive his son for he had already been punished. ‘Umar (rta) did not consider his requests. When ‘Abd al-Raḥmān (rta) saw the rage of his father, he cried and pleaded that he was unwell. He lamented that his father was about to kill him. It has been narrated that ‘‘Umar (rta) punished ‘Abd al-Raḥmān while he was still unwell. He was put in custody till he fell ill and died.[2]



            [1]Haykal, al-Fārūq ‘Umar, 2: 197
            [2]Ibid., 2: 198. I have taken this story from Muḥammad Ḥusayn (rta) Haykal’s Al-Fārūq ‘Umar. The author maintains that ‘Abd al-Raḥmān was punished again. I, however, doubt this. Some scholars have explained that ‘Umar (rta) did not sentence him to the sharī‘ah punishment again. He only punished him just as a father disciplines his child. This I believe is correct.
            Author: Tariq Mahmood Hashmi
            Last edited by MMFI; 25-05-14, 03:54 AM. Reason: typo

            Comment

            Working...
            X