Ads by Muslim Ad Network


No announcement yet.


No announcement yet.

Understanding Punishment in Shariah [I]

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Understanding Punishment in Shariah [I]

    Understanding Punishment in Shariah [I]:
    Its Role & Principles at a Glance

    [By Taha Ghayyur]

    Skilfully manipulated display of the imagery of a whip cracking on a naked back of a Nigerian woman and a veil enshrouding a woman’s face in Afghanistan have led many to believe that Shariah, the divine code of Muslim conduct, is in reality no more than a set of principles and practices that are primitive, unrefined and barbaric. As Khurram Murad states, “What to a Muslim is the object of his longing and endeavour, has been very subtly projected as a relic from the dark ages which inflicts punishments and harshness on the criminal that are cruel, inhuman and degrading.”[i] Shariah literally means ‘way to water’—the source of all life[ii]. Therefore, to a Muslim, Shariah signifies the way to God as given by God.

    This two-part treatise seeks to objectively explore the forms and role of punishments prescribed by the Islamic Law. An attempt is made to highlight the framework and factors that distinguish the Shariah, as a mechanism of retribution, reform, and deterrence, from the judicial system prevalent today. This study is by no means an apologetic response to the barrage of criticisms that the Islamic text and laws face today.


    The Quran certainly does legislate corporal punishment for certain social crimes and it does allow for the option of retribution (Qisas, as it is called in Arabic). In order to comprehend the purpose of punishments in Islam, it is vital that the fundamental principles related to justice and responsibility, are studied.

    FIRSTLY, the notion of accepting responsibility for one’s own actions and one’s accountability before God are central to the Quran’s theme. A human being has been called “Vicegerent of God” in the Quran; i.e. his or her purpose of creation on this earth is to be representative of God and to govern it with a sense of justice and equity. For, to fulfil the purpose of his or her creation, one has been granted freedom to choose and act, and a moral sense to distinguish between right and wrong. Unlike secular societies, where the human intellect and freedom have increasingly and virtually become the ultimate authorities, as argued by John von Heyking, a Professor of Study of Civil Society at University of Calgary[iii], Islamic law keeps personal freedom checked with personal responsibility. As Hasan al-Anani elaborates, “The ability of a person to bear his responsibility independently strengthens his freedom, which is the most important aspect of responsibility, both for self-development of an individual and for the development of the community.”[iv]

    SECONDLY, a careful survey of the Islamic injunctions would reveal that Shariah’s aim is ultimately to serve human welfare. Salman al-Oadah explains: “Shariah’s general precepts return to universal principles under which falls every aspect of human welfare. The five universal principles of Islamic Shariah are: To preserve one’s life, religion, reason, lineage, and property.”[v] It is interesting to observe that each of the major punishments (also known as ‘boundaries’ or Hudood) prescribed by the Quran, deals with the violation of one of the five universal objectives of the Islamic law. For instance, to preserve life, it prescribes the law of retribution. To preserve religion, it legislates the punishment for apostasy. In addition, to preserve reason, Shariah prescribes the punishment for drinking. To preserve lineage, it stipulates the penalty for fornication and false accusation against a chaste innocent woman. Moreover, to preserve wealth, Islamic penal system specifies the punishment for theft and highway robbery.

    THIRDLY, it is imperative to note that punishment in Islam has nothing to do with the notions of atonement, expiation, or wiping away of sins. A crime is essentially an act of injustice to one’s own self. It can be removed only by God, and that He does when a person turns to Him, truly repentant and seeking forgiveness. Between man and God, therefore, the total emphasis is on repentance, and the corporeal punishment can be no substitute for it. At the same time, a crime is also an act against the social order and in this sphere, as some may argue mere repentance cannot be an alternative for punishment. Keeping these two distinctions (i.e. crime against God and crime against society) in perspective, John Burton, Professor of Law and Religion at University of Toronto, provides an interesting insight, “This sounds somewhat like the distinction that the Protestant theologians drew between two uses of the law. The first use was to help the person realize his/her total dependence on God. The second use was to maintain order in society.”

    FOURTHLY, penal laws are only a part of a larger integrated whole of the Shariah. They can neither be properly understood, nor justifiably implemented in isolation. Khurram Murad states three points elucidating the place of penal system in the Islamic law:

    First, law is not the main, or even major, vehicle in the total framework for the reinforcement of morality; it is the individual’s belief, his God-consciousness and Taqwa, - that inherent and innate quality which makes him want to refrain from what displeases God and do what pleases Him. Second, justice is a positive ideal which permeates and dominates the entire community life; it is not merely an institutionalized means of inflicting punishment. Third, and consequently, a whole environment is established where to do right is encouraged, facilitated and found easy, and to do wrong is discouraged, inhibited and found difficult. [vi]

    This is not to say, of course, that the contemporary practice of certain zealots of Shariah has not exaggerated, or even misplaced, the position of punishments in the Shariah. Undoubtedly, the elaborate infrastructure of Islamic penal code, and its implementation, as expounded by the four major classical Muslim jurists and schools of jurisprudence, has largely been manipulated, if not ignored, by the so-called upholders of the Shariah today. One may wonder, in the regions where Shariah is supposedly implemented today, is a punishment executed as a last resort, after all the attempts of counseling, and the investigation of offender’s and victim’s circumstances as well as witnesses, have been exhausted?

    [Note: Continue the second part of this discourse "Understanding Punishment in Shariah [II]: Its Method, Allowance & Application"]


    [i] Khurram Murad, Shari’ah The Way of Justice, (Markfield, Leicester: The Islamic Foundation, 1999), 3.

    [ii] K. Murad, Shari’ah: The Way of Justice, 5.

    [iii] John Von Heyking. The Harmonization of Heaven and Earth?: Religion, Politics, and Law in Canada. 1999.

    [iv] Hasan al-Anani, Freedom and Responsibility in Quranic Perspective, (Indianapolis: American Trust Publications, 1990), 189.

    [v] Salman Awdah.

    [vi] K. Murad, Shari’ah: The Way of Justice, 16.


  • #2
    Re: Understanding Punishment in Shariah [I]

    Jazak Allah Khair :up:


    • #3
      By Taha Ghayyur

      Over a year and a half ago, I was alerted by a Facebook friend about an article by a fringe blogger known for promoting Islamophobic content, targeting me and the community organizations I was affiliated with.

      Soon after, several bloggers and websites across North America known for advocating hate and intolerance against minorities began to "re-publish" the "original" article.

      Authors of such blogs and websites are known for targeting genuine Muslim community leaders who are faithful to their faith and traditions as Muslims and are proud, contributing Canadian citizens. They actively discredit the efforts of community leaders by misquoting or quoting out of context something they may have said or written decades ago. Moreover, they attempt to make remote connections between the community work the leaders do here with some "political Islam" ideology, movement, or group in the Muslim world. The drill is familiar.

      However, what is truly disturbing about the recent attempts to discredit me, my work, and the organizations I have been working with for years, is the fact that the quotes and extracts that are being attributed to my name and my writings ARE NOT ENDORSED OR PUBLISHED BY ME!

      Here are the facts about the two-part article, "Understanding Punishment in Sharia", being attributed to me by these writers:It is obvious that my name is being attributed to this piece either mistakenly or deliberately. Or perhaps there is another author out there with the same name.

      This is sloppy journalism at its best!

      Or, perhaps, it is a classic case of fake news.

      My writings, presentations, and volunteer work have always been transparent. I believe, no community leader should have anything to hide if they are doing the right thing.

      My 20 years' of community volunteerism, leadership, and civic engagement have been based on the following core values that are both Islamic and Canadian:
      • Transparency
      • Collaboration
      • Consultation
      • Respect
      • Inclusion
      • Peace and Harmony
      • Bridge-Building
      • Trust
      • Charity
      • Freedom of religion
      • Freedom of speech

      While politics is not my forte (and certainly not "political Islam" and "Shariah"), I have categorically spoken out against the sickening and deadly ideologies of AlQaida, ISIS, and Daesh. In fact, I have written about why young Muslims get radicalized and what we need to do to engage youth in positive and productive ways as a civic society and leadership in North America.

      Anyone who wants to objectively understand what I stand for and what I do has to simply look at my official blog. Anything published outside is either fabricated and fictitious or not endorsed by me. Period.

      Last edited by tahag; 22-01-18, 08:46 PM.



      Edit this module to specify a template to display.