Ads by Muslim Ad Network

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Warning: Preachers (Shamsi, Dawah Man, etc.) who disrespect the Prophet ๏ทบ

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Warning: Preachers (Shamsi, Dawah Man, etc.) who disrespect the Prophet ๏ทบ

    Salamun 'alaykum,

    there are two creatures - Shamsi and Imran ibn Mansur (aka Dawah Man) - who some people regard as "preachers" and even listen to and take serious.
    I personally don't listen to these type of people, because it's obvious that they lack knowledge, understanding and insight and are causing more harm than benefit. Even for "Salafi" standards - which is quite low anyways - they're a joke.

    However their case is much worse than other so called "preachers" ("Du'at") and this is due to the fact that both of them have at some point disrespected our Prophet - sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam - in their so called "Da'wa" and this in public. (I came to know about this from other sources.)

    Know - may Allah ta'ala have mercy upon you - that there is no belief (Iman) without wholeheartedly believing in the Messenger of Allah - sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam - and loving him and respecting him. He - 'alayhi afdhal al-salat wal salam - should not be mentioned except in the best of manners and by sending peace and blessings upon him. It's therefore among the greatest of crimes to disrespect him or disparage him in any way or form.

    The classical scholars have mentioned that anyone disrespecting the Prophet (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) in a clear manner - even if unintentionally! - has disbelieved and is to be executed.
    (Please refer to the following thread: "Qadhi 'Iyadh: Ruling upon seven cases which contain disrepect towards the Prophet ๏ทบ")

    They only disagreed whether the repentance of such a person wards off execution or not with the Malikiyya, Hanabila and some Ahnaf saying that these type of people are to be executed no matter what, while most Ahnaf and the Shafi'iyya said that repentance can ward of execution.
    (Note: This is not to say that people are allowed to take the law into their own hands! Rather these rulings are only implemented under the authority of the state and after a fair trial and verdict of the judge and only then.)



    The Case of Dawah Man

    There is an older video video of him discussing with a Sikh person (listen from 33:06 min on):



    So he says "... and you have to ask yourself that how on earth does a bedouin in the desert - who doesn't even know how to read or write - produce a text where just ten words have forty rhetoric devices..." and this is clearly contains a disrespectful statement towards our Prophet - sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam - to the degree that the Sikh guy directly asks him "But you're not implying that he was stupid?".

    Is this what he calls "Da'wa"?! Disrespecting the Best of Creation (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam)?

    Note that the Prophet - sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam - was NOT "a bedouin in the desert" as the scoundrel in his ignorance claimed, rather he was born in the CITY of Makka al-mukarrama and he lived in it and also in the CITY of Madina al-Munawwara!
    There are ways to explain the miracle of the Qur`an and how the Prophet - sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam - not having learned to read and write and at the same time possessing so much knowledge and insight - the highest amount among all creation! - proves him receiving revelation, but disrespecting him is definitely NOT one of the ways to explain this!



    The Case of Shamsi

    There is a video by Muhammad Hijab where in the beginning the incident in question is seen:



    So here we see that a worthless disbeliever disrespects our Prophet - sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam - and Shamsi gets annoyed by him and then he - in his absolute idiocy and lack of respect! - AFFIRMS (!) his words by saying "Okay he had *** with his daughter [in law]; okay, okay, go. Is that make you happy?...". (I censored his ugly statement.)

    And these words are OPEN and CLEAR disrespect towards our Prophet (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) and there is NO justification whatsoever to utter these words! But this scoundrel instead of repenting from these words and RENEWING his Islam after leaving it, rather decided to defend his criminal behaviour by saying that it was "sarcasm" and even made a video on this. What he does not seem to get at all is that whether it was sarcasm or not and whether it was intentional or not, in ALL these cases the ruling is the same!

    Muhammad Hijab has uploaded several other videos (examples: HERE, HERE, HERE and HERE) other than the above one after this incident, where he advises this creature named Shamsi to repent and to accept that he had committed a mistake and so on. Now it's praiseworthy that he's advising him and warning others regarding the gravity of these type of Kufri statements - he affirms also that it's such a statement -, but I really don't get it why he refers to him as "brother" or even "beloved brother" again and again and even states again and again that he's not making Takfir upon him and that he does not regard him an apostate and so on. I don't know from what exact background he is, but I don't understand why he's doing this.

    It's correct that Takfir is a major issue and that the person who enters Islam with certainty does not exit it except with certainty, but we're speaking here about one of the GREATEST CRIMES that a creation can commit (other than polytheism)! He openly and explicitly said disrespectful words regarding the Messenger of Allah - sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam - and this while being a sane person and not being under duress!
    Doing this throws one out of the religion and this even if one didn't intend disrespect as is mentioned by the classical scholars! It's obligatory to show enmity towards such criminals and if one speaks to them then only to call them to repent and accept Islam again!


    Let it be very clear: Our brothers are those who love and respect the Prophet - sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam - and NOT those who disrespect him and this no matter under which excuse (other than duress and losing sanity)!


    The ruling upon those who disrespect the Prophet ๏ทบ in a clear manner whether intentionally or not

    Al-Qadhi 'Iyadh (d. 544 AH) stated regarding intentional disrespect:

    ุชู‚ุฏู… ุงู„ู’ูƒูŽู„ูŽุงู… ูููŠ ู‚ูŽุชู’ู„ ุงู„ู‚ุงุตูุฏ ู„ูุณูŽุจู‘ู‡ ูˆูŽุงู„ุฅุฒู’ุฑูŽุงุก ุจูู‡ ูˆูŽุบูŽู…ู’ุตูู‡ ุจุฃูŠู‘ ูˆูŽุฌู’ู‡ ูƒูŽุงู† ู…ู† ู…ูู…ู’ูƒูู† ุฃูŽูˆ ู…ูุญูŽุงู„ ููŽู‡ูŽุฐูŽุง ูˆูŽุฌู’ู‡ ุจูŽูŠู’ู† ู„ูŽุง ุฅุดู’ูƒูŽุงู„ ูููŠู‡

    [The First Case:] We have mentioned earlier that whosoever intentionally disrespects or disparages him in whatever manner โ€“ regardless of whether such description is possible or impossible755 โ€“ such a person is executed. This is a clear-cut case and there is no reason for confusion nor anything problematic about it.
    - end of quote (from Al-Shifa bi Ta'rif Huquq al-Mustafa 2/231) -

    He thereafter stated regarding unintentional disrespect:

    ุงู„ู’ูˆูŽุฌู’ู‡ ุงู„ุซุงู†ูŠ ู„ูŽุง ุญูŽู‚ู‘ ุจูู‡ ูููŠ ุงู„ู’ุจูŽูŠูŽุงู† ูˆูŽุงู„ู’ุฌูŽู„ูŽุงุก ูˆูŽู‡ููˆ ุฃู† ูŠูŽูƒููˆู† ุงู„ู’ู‚ูŽุงุฆูู„ ู„ูŽู…ู‘ุง ู‚ูŽุงู„ ูููŠ ุฌูู‡ูŽุชูู‡ ุตูŽู„ู‘ูŽู‰ ุงู„ู„ู‘ูŽู‡ ุนูŽู„ูŽูŠู’ู‡ ูˆูŽุณูŽู„ู‘ูŽู… ุบูŽูŠู’ุฑ ู‚ูŽุงุตูุฏ ู„ูู„ุณู‘ุจู‘ ูˆูŽุงู„ู’ุฅุฒู’ุฑูŽุงุก ูˆูŽู„ูŽุง ู…ูุนู’ุชูู‚ูŽุฏ ู„ูŽู‡ ูˆู„ูƒู†ู‡ ุชูŽูƒูŽู„ู‘ู… ูููŠ ุฌูู‡ูŽุชูู‡ ุตูŽู„ู‘ูŽู‰ ุงู„ู„ู‘ูŽู‡ ุนูŽู„ูŽูŠู’ู‡ ูˆูŽุณูŽู„ู‘ูŽู… ุจููƒูŽู„ูู…ูŽุฉ ุงู„ู’ูƒููู’ุฑ ู…ู† ู„ูŽุนู’ู†ูู‡ ุฃูŽูˆ ุณูŽุจู‘ูŽู‡ ุฃูŽูˆ ุชูŽูƒุฐูŠุจูู‡ ุฃูŽูˆ ุฅุถูŽุงููŽุฉ ู…ูŽุง ู„ูŽุง ูŠูŽุฌููˆุฒ ุนูŽู„ูŽูŠู’ู‡ ุฃูŽูˆ ู†ูŽูู’ูŠ ู…ูŽุง ูŠุฌูŠุจ ู„ูŽู‡ ู…ูู…ู‘ูŽุง ู‡ููˆ ูููŠ ุญูŽู‚ู‘ู‡ ุตูŽู„ู‘ูŽู‰ ุงู„ู„ู‘ูŽู‡ ุนูŽู„ูŽูŠู’ู‡ ูˆูŽุณูŽู„ู‘ูŽู… ู†ูŽู‚ููŠุตูŽุฉ ู…ูุซู’ู„ ุฃูŽู†ู‘ ูŠูŽู†ู’ุณูุจ ุฅู„ูŠู’ู‡ ุฅุชู’ูŠูŽุงู† ูƒูŽุจููŠุฑูŽุฉ ุฃูŽูˆ ู…ูุฏุงู‡ูŽู†ูŽุฉ ูููŠ ุชุจู„ูŠุบ ุงู„ุฑู‘ุณูŽุงู„ุฉ ุฃูŽูˆ ูููŠ ุญููƒู’ู… ุจูŽูŠู’ู† ุงู„ู†ู‘ูŽุงุณ ุฃูŽูˆ ูŠูŽุบูุถู‘ ู…ู† ู…ูŽุฑู’ุชุจุชู‡ ุฃูŽูˆ ุดูŽุฑูŽู ู†ูŽุณูŽุจูŽู‡ ุฃูŽูˆ ูˆููููˆุฑ ุนูู„ู’ู…ูู‡ ุฃูŽูˆ ุฒูู‡ู’ุฏูู‡ ุฃูŽูˆ ูŠููƒูŽุฐู‘ุจ ุจูู…ูŽุง ุงุดู’ุชูŽู‡ูŽุฑ ู…ู† ุฃูู…ููˆุฑ ุฃุฎู’ุจูŽุฑ ุจูู‡ูŽุง ุตูŽู„ู‘ูŽู‰ ุงู„ู„ู‘ูŽู‡ ุนูŽู„ูŽูŠู’ู‡ ูˆูŽุณูŽู„ู‘ูŽู… ูˆุชูŽูˆูŽุงุชูŽุฑ ุงู„ู’ุฎูŽุจูŽุฑ ุจูู‡ูŽุง ุนูŽู† ู‚ุตู’ุฏ ู„ูุฑูŽุฏ ุฎูŽุจูŽุฑูู‡ ุฃูŽูˆ ูŠูŽุฃู’ุชููŠ ุจูุณูŽููŽู‡ ู…ูู† ุงู„ู’ู‚ูŽูˆู’ู„ ุฃูŽูˆ ู‚ูŽุจููŠุญ ู…ูู† ุงู„ู’ูƒูŽู„ูŽุงู… ูˆู†ูˆุน ู…ูู† ุงู„ุณู‘ูŽุจู‘ ูููŠ ุฌูู‡ูŽุชูู‡ ูˆุฅู† ุธูŽู‡ูŽุฑ ุจูุฏูŽู„ููŠู„ ุญูŽุงู„ูู‡ ุฃู†ู‘ูŽู‡ ู„ูŽู… ูŠูŽุนู’ุชูŽู…ูุฏ ุฐูŽู…ู‘ู‡ ูˆูŽู„ูŽู… ูŠูŽู‚ู’ุตูุฏ ุณูŽุจู‘ูŽู‡ ุฅูู…ู‘ูŽุง ู„ูุฌูŽู‡ูŽุงู„ูŽุฉ ุญู…ู„ุชู‡ ุนูŽู„ูŽู‰ ู…ูŽุง ู‚ุงู„ู‡ ุฃูŽูˆ ู„ูุถูŽุฌูุฑ ุฃูŽูˆ ุณููƒู’ุฑ ุฃุถู’ุทูŽุฑู‘ู‡ ุฅู„ูŠู’ู‡ ุฃูŽูˆ ู‚ูู„ู‘ุฉ ู…ูุฑูŽุงู‚ูŽุจูŽุฉ ูˆูŽุถูŽุจู’ุท ู„ูู„ุณูŽุงู†ูู‡.
    ูˆุนูŽุฌู’ุฑูŽููŽุฉ ูˆูŽุชูŽู‡ูŽูˆู‘ูุฑ ูููŠ ูƒูŽู„ูŽุงู…ูู‡
    ููŽุญููƒู’ู… ู‡ูŽุฐูŽุง ุงู„ู’ูˆูŽุฌู’ู‡ ุญููƒู’ู… ุงู„ู’ูˆูŽุฌู’ู‡ ุงู„ุฃูˆู‘ู„ ุงู„ู’ู‚ูŽุชู’ู„ ุฏูˆู† ุชูŽู„ูŽุนู’ุซูู… ุฅูุฐ ู„ูŽุง ูŠูุนู’ุฐูŽุฑ ุฃูŽุญูŽุฏ ูููŠ ุงู„ู’ูƒููู’ุฑ ุจูุงู„ู’ุฌูŽู‡ูŽุงู„ูŽุฉ ูˆูŽู„ูŽุง ุจุฏุนูˆู‰ ุฒู„ู„ ุงู„ู„ุณุงู† ูˆู„ุง ุจุดุฆ ู…ูู…ู‘ูŽุง ุฐูƒุฑู†ุงู‡ ุฅุฐูŽุง ูƒูŽุงู† ุนู‚ู„ู‡ ูููŠ ูุทุฑุชู‡ ุณู„ูŠู…ู‹ุง ุฅู„ู‘ูŽุง ู…ู† ุฃูƒุฑู‡ ูˆู‚ู„ุจู‡ ู…ุทู…ุฆู† ุจุงู„ุฅูŠู…ุงู†

    The Second Case: is similar to the previous one in its wording and explicitness; however, the utterer does not say it with the intention of insulting or disparaging the Prophet ๏ทบ, nor does he believe in such things. But he has [nevertheless] uttered blasphemies โ€“ words of kufr:

    โ€ข that criticise him or insult him or belie him;

    โ€ข or attribute things to him which are forbidden to say about him or negate something which is obligatory for him;

    โ€ข or attributes a flaw or fault to him โ€“ such as accusing him of commiting a major sin or flattery or cajolery when he preached to others or [when he] delivered the message, or in his adjudication between disputing parties;

    โ€ข or says things that diminish the lofty rank Allฤh tรกฤlฤ has bestowed upon him, or [disparages] his noble lineage or [degrades] the extensiveness of his knowledge or his austerity;

    โ€ข or if a person denies things informed by him, when such reports are well-known and have reached the level of tawฤtur, [if such denial is in the form of] seeking to reject his opinion;

    โ€ข or if a person talks about him in a rude and brusque manner, or speaks about him in vulgar and uncouth words or any other form of abusive speech;

    Even if the person proves that he has not deliberately said any of this to deride him ๏ทบ; or intended to insult or disparage him ๏ทบ โ€“ whether it was ignorance that made him say such things or because he was discontented or disgruntled, or he was inebriated, or he blurted it out without thinking or it slipped from his tongue, or because of haughtiness or impudence, or impetuousity and recklessness; in all such cases, the ruling is the same as in the first case โ€“ that is, execution without further deliberation or any hesitation, because the excuse of ignorance [in such cases] which cause apostasy is inadmissible, nor the excuse of slip of the tongue, nor any other excuse which I have mentioned above as long as the person is sane and has not lost his reason. Except a person in duress, who utters such things due to coercion โ€“ as long as faith is undisturbed in his heart.
    - end of quote (from Al-Shifa bi Ta'rif Huquq al-Mustafa 2/231) -

    (The rest of quote can be found HERE.)



    The importance of warning against those who disrespect the Prophet ๏ทบ

    Al-Qadhi 'Iyadh (d. 544 AH) stated regarding this:

    ุงู„ู’ูˆูŽุฌู’ู‡ ุงู„ุณุงุฏุณ ุฃูŽู†ู‘ ูŠูŽู‚ููˆู„ ุงู„ู‚ุงุฆู„ ุฐูŽู„ููƒ ุญุงูƒูŠุง ุนู† ุบูŽูŠู’ุฑูู‡ ูˆูŽุขุซูุฑู‹ุง ู„ูŽู‡ ุนูŽู† ุณููˆูŽุงู‡ ููŽู‡ูŽุฐูŽุง ูŠูู†ู’ุธูŽุฑ ูููŠ ุตููˆุฑูŽุฉ ุญููƒูŽุงูŠูŽุชูู‡ ูˆูŽู‚ูุฑูŠู†ูŽุฉ ู…ูŽู‚ูŽุงู„ูŽุชูู‡ ูˆูŽูŠูŽุฎู’ุชูŽู„ู ุงู„ุญููƒู’ู… ุจุงุฎุชู„ุงู ุฐูŽู„ููƒ ุนูŽู„ูŽู‰ ุฃุฑุจุนุฉ ูˆูุฌููˆู‡: ุงู„ู’ูˆูุฌููˆุจุŒ ูˆูŽุงู„ู†ู‘ุฏู’ุจุŒ ูˆุงู„ูƒูŽุฑูŽุงู‡ูŽุฉุŒ ูˆุงู„ุชู‘ุญู’ุฑููŠู… ูุฅู† ูƒูŽุงู† ุฃุฎู’ุจูŽุฑ ุจูู‡ ุนูŽู„ูŽู‰ ูˆูŽุฌู’ู‡ ุงู„ุดู‘ู‡ูŽุงุฏูŽุฉ ูˆูŽุงู„ุชู‘ุนู’ุฑููŠู ุจู‚ุงุฆู„ู‡ ูˆุงู„ุฅู†ูƒุงุฑ ูˆุงู„ุฅุนู„ุงู… ุจูู‚ูŽูˆู’ู„ูู‡ ูˆุงู„ุชู‘ู†ู’ูููŠุฑ ู…ูู†ู’ู‡ ูˆุงู„ุชู‘ุฌู’ุฑููŠุญ ู„ูŽู‡ ููŽู‡ูŽุฐูŽุง ู…ูู…ู‘ูŽุง ูŠูŽู†ู’ุจูŽุบููŠ ุงู…ู’ุชูุซูŽุงู„ูู‡ ูˆูŽูŠูุญู’ู…ุฏ ูุงุนูู„ูู‡ ูˆูŽูƒูŽุฐูŽู„ููƒ ุฅู† ุญูŽูƒุงู‡ ูููŠ ูƒูุชูŽุงุจ ุฃูˆ ูููŠ ู…ุฌู„ุณ ุนูŽู„ูŽู‰ ุทุฑูŠู‚ ุงู„ุฑู‘ูŽุฏ ู„ูŽู‡ ูˆุงู„ู†ู‘ูŽู‚ู’ุถ ุนูŽู„ูŽู‰ ู‚ุงุฆู„ู‡ ูˆุงู„ููุชู’ูŠูŽุง ุจูู…ูŽุง ูŠูŽู„ู’ุฒูŽู…ูู‡ ูˆูŽู‡ูŽุฐูŽุง ู…ู†ู‡ ู…ูŽุง ูŠูŽุฌูุจ ูˆูŽู…ูู†ู’ู‡ ู…ูŽุง ูŠูุณู’ุชูŽุญูŽุจ ุจุญุณูŽุจ ุญูŽุงู„ูŽุงุช ุงู„ุญุงูƒูŠ ู„ูุฐูŽู„ููƒ ูˆูŽุงู„ู…ูŽุญู’ูƒูŠ ุนูŽู†ู’ู‡ ูุฅู† ูƒุงู† ุงู„ู‚ุงุฆู„ ู„ูุฐูŽู„ููƒ ู…ูู…ู‘ูŽู† ุชูŽุตูŽุฏู‘ู‰ ู„ุฃู† ูŠูุคู’ุฎุฐ ุนูŽู†ู’ู‡ ุงู„ู’ุนูู„ู’ู… ุฃูˆ ุฑููˆุงูŠุฉ ุงู„ุญุฏูŠุซ ุฃูŽูˆ ูŠูู‚ู’ุทูŽุน ุจุญููƒู’ู…ูู‡ ุฃูŽูˆ ุดูŽู‡ูŽุงุฏูŽุชูู‡ ุฃูŽูˆ ููุชู’ูŠูŽุงู‡ ูููŠ ุงู„ุญูู‚ููˆู‚ ูˆูŽุฌูŽุจ ุนูŽู„ูŽู‰ ุณูŽุงู…ูุนูู‡ ุงู„ุฅุดุงุฏูŽุฉ ุจูู…ูŽุง ุณูู…ุน ู…ูู†ู’ู‡ ูˆูŽุงู„ุชู‘ู†ู’ูููŠุฑ ู„ู„ู†ู‘ูŽุงุณ ุนูŽู†ู’ู‡ ูˆุงู„ุดู‡ุงุฏุฉ ุนูŽู„ูŽูŠู’ู‡ ุจูู…ูŽุง ู‚ุงู„ู‡ ูˆูˆุฌุจ ุนูŽู„ูŽู‰ ู…ู† ุจู„ุบู‡ ุฐูŽู„ููƒ ู…ู† ุฃุฆูู…ู‘ูŽุฉ ุงู„ู’ู…ูุณู’ู„ูู…ููŠู† ุฅู†ูƒุงุฑู‡ ูˆุจูŠุงู† ูƒูุฑู‡ ูˆูุณุงุฏ ู‚ูŽูˆู’ู„ู‡ ุจู‚ุทุน ุถุฑุฑู‡ ุนูŽู† ุงู„ู’ู…ูุณู’ู„ูู…ููŠู† ูˆู‚ูŠุงู…ู‹ุง ุจุญู‚ู‘ ุณูŽูŠู‘ุฏ ุงู„ู’ู…ูุฑู’ุณูŽู„ููŠู† ูˆูŽูƒูŽุฐูŽู„ููƒ ุฅู† ูƒูŽุงู† ู…ูู…ู‘ูŽู† ูŠุนุธ ุงู„ุนูŽุงู…ู‘ุฉ ุฃูŽูˆ ูŠูุคุฏู‘ุจ ุงู„ุตู‘ุจู’ูŠูŽุงู† ููŽุฅูู†ู‘ ู…ู† ู‡ูŽุฐูู‡ ุณูŽุฑููŠุฑูŽุชูู‡ ู„ุง ูŠุคู…ู† ุนูŽู„ูŽู‰ ุฅู„ู‚ุงุก ุฐูŽู„ููƒ ูููŠ ู‚ู„ูˆุจู‡ู… ููŠุชุฃูƒุฏ ูููŠ ู‡ูŽุคู’ู„ูŽุงุก ุงู„ุฅูŠุฌุงุจ ู„ุญู‚ ุงู„ู†ู‘ูŽุจููŠู‘ ุตูŽู„ู‘ูŽู‰ ุงู„ู„ู‘ูŽู‡ ุนูŽู„ูŽูŠู’ู‡ ูˆูŽุณูŽู„ู‘ูŽู… ูˆู„ุญู‚ ุดุฑูŠุนุชู‡ ูˆูŽุฅูู†ู‘ ู„ูŽู… ูŠูŽูƒูู† ุงู„ู‚ุงุฆูู„ ุจูู‡ูŽุฐูู‡ ุงู„ุณู‘ุจูŠู„ ูุงู„ู’ู‚ููŠูŽุงู… ุจุญูŽู‚ู‘ ุงู„ู†ู‘ูŽุจููŠู‘ ุตูŽู„ู‘ูŽู‰ ุงู„ู„ู‘ูŽู‡ ุนูŽู„ูŽูŠู’ู‡ ูˆูŽุณูŽู„ู‘ูŽู… ูˆูŽุงุฌูุจ ูˆูŽุญูู…ูŽุงูŠูŽุฉ ุนูุฑู’ุถูู‡ ู…ูุชูŽุนูŽูŠู‘ู† ูˆูŽู†ูุตู’ุฑูŽุชูู‡ ุนูŽู„ูŽู‰ ุงู„ุฃุฐู‰ ุญูŽูŠู‘ู‹ุง ูˆูŽู…ูŠุชู‹ุง ู…ูุณู’ุชูŽุญู‚ู‘ ุนูŽู„ูŽู‰ ูƒูู„ู‘ ู…ูุคู’ู…ูู† ู„ูƒู†ู‡ ุฅุฐุง ู‚ูŽุงู… ุจูŽู‡ูŽุฐูŽุง ู…ู† ุธูŽู‡ูŽุฑ ุจูู‡ ุงู„ู’ุญูŽู‚ู‘ ูˆูŽููุตูู„ูŽุช ุจูู‡ ุงู„ู‚ูŽุถููŠู‘ุฉ ูˆุจุงู† ุจูู‡ ุงู„ุฃู…ู’ุฑ ุณูŽู‚ูŽุท ุนูŽู† ุงู„ุจุงู‚ูŠ ุงู„ููŽุฑู’ุถ ูˆูŽุจูŽู‚ููŠ ุงู„ุงุณู’ุชูุญู’ุจูŽุงุจ ูููŠ ุชูƒู’ุซููŠุฑ ุงู„ุดู‘ูŽู‡ูŽุงุฏูŽุฉ ุนูŽู„ูŽูŠู’ู‡ ูˆุนูŽุถู’ุฏ ุงู„ุชู‘ุญู’ุฐููŠุฑ ู…ูู†ู’ู‡

    The Sixth Case: When one cites or reports blasphemies of others. The context of the citation, his actual words and situation will be taken into account for the ruling and it varies accordingly in four possible categories:

    1.Obligatory / Wฤjib

    2.Preferrable / Nadb

    3.Disliked / Makrลซh

    4.Forbidden / ฤคarฤm


    If a person mentions them in his testimony against a blasphemer and to inform others, and to reject and refute such speech; and to make it known to the public so that they abhor the blasphemer and criticise him โ€“ then such a narration is required and whoever does this is praiseworthy; similarly, if he mentions such things in a book or in a gathering to refute and quash such blasphemies or to issue a fatwฤ related to such utterances. This is obligatory807 or recommended for him depending on the situation and the state of the person who narrates and the one about whom such a narration is made.

    If the person who uttered [such blasphemies] is a person known to be a scholar or a teacher, [a shaykh or a muftฤซ], or a ฤฅadฤซth scholar and narrator, or a person in authority808 or known to be a reliable witness or a well-known jurist โ€“ then it is obligatory for whosoever hears [such a thing from him] to expose him and make the public aware of what has been heard from him โ€“ and to make people dislike such a person, to bear witness against such a person and what he has said; it is obligatory for scholars and leaders in the Muslim community to repudiate such a person and clearly communicate the kufr of this person and the monstrosity of his ugly speech so that Muslims are safeguarded from the evil of such a person โ€“ and the right of the Leader of Messengers ๏ทบ is well established. Similarly, if that person [who has uttered a blasphemy] is a preacher or a schoolmaster; if this be the things in his heart, then how can he be trusted to teach the love and reverence of RasลซlAllฤh ๏ทบ to those in his care or his audience?

    It is definitely obligatory to publicise the blasph
    emies of such people809 โ€“ for the right of the Prophet ๏ทบ and the right of the Sharฤซรกh. If the blasphemer is not a scholar or a person of religious authority, even then defending the right of the Prophet and guarding his honour is a religious duty; and to support him against those who seek to hurt him, whether in his worldly life or after his passing is a right upon every believer. However, if one person stands to fulfil this duty810 in the service of the Messenger, to aid the Truth and establish the ruling, then the responsibility is waived from others and it is not obligatory on all others anymore โ€“ yet, it is recommended for others to attest this personโ€™s actions and support him to warn against the evil of the blasphemer.

    - end of quote (from Al-Shifa bi Ta'rif Huquq al-Mustafa 2/244 - 245) -

    (The rest of quote can be found HERE.)


    Note that the above is found in one of the very famous and accepted works and is supported by classical scholars in general!

  • #2
    Originally posted by Abu Sulayman View Post
    The Case of Dawah Man

    There is an older video video of him discussing with a Sikh person (listen from 33:06 min on):



    So he says "... and you have to ask yourself that how on earth does a bedouin in the desert - who doesn't even know how to read or write - produce a text where just ten words have forty rhetoric devices..." and this is clearly contains a disrespectful statement towards our Prophet - sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam - to the degree that the Sikh guy directly asks him "But you're not implying that he was stupid?".

    Is this what he calls "Da'wa"?! Disrespecting the Best of Creation (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam)?

    Note that the Prophet - sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam - was NOT "a bedouin in the desert" as the scoundrel in his ignorance claimed, rather he was born in the CITY of Makka al-mukarrama and he lived in it and also in the CITY of Madina al-Munawwara!
    There are ways to explain the miracle of the Qur`an and how the Prophet - sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam - not having learned to read and write and at the same time possessing so much knowledge and insight - the highest amount among all creation! - proves him receiving revelation, but disrespecting him is definit
    This is how one could explain the issue with good manners and not like the scoundrel above:


    Al-Qadhi 'Iyadh (d. 544 AH) said:

    ูˆูŽูƒูŽุฐูŽู„ููƒ ุฅุฐูŽุง ูˆูุตูู ุจุฃู†ู‘ูŽู‡ ุฃูู…ู‘ูŠู‘ ูƒูŽู…ูŽุง ูˆุตูŽููŽู‡ ุงู„ู„ู‘ูŽู‡ ูู‡ูŠ ู…ูุฏู’ุญูŽุฉ ู„ูŽู‡ ูˆูŽููŽุถููŠู„ูŽุฉ ุซูŽุงุจูุชูŽุฉ ูููŠู‡ ูˆูŽู‚ูŽุงุนูุฏูŽุฉ ู…ูุนู’ุฌูุฒูŽุชูู‡ ุฅุฐ ู…ุนุฌุฒุชู‡ ุงู„ู’ุนูุธู…ูŽู‰ ู…ูู† ุงู„ู’ู‚ูุฑู’ุขู† ุงู„ุนูŽุธููŠู… ุฅู†ู‘ูŽู…ูŽุง ู‡ููŠ ู…ูุชูŽุนูŽู„ู‚ูŽุฉ ุจูุทูŽุฑูŠู‚ ุงู„ู…ูŽุนูŽุงุฑูู ูˆูŽุงู„ู’ุนูู„ููˆู… ู…ูŽุน ู…ูŽุง ู…ูู†ูŽุญ ุตูŽู„ู‘ูŽู‰ ุงู„ู„ู‘ูŽู‡ ุนูŽู„ูŽูŠู’ู‡ ูˆูŽุณูŽู„ู‘ูŽู… ูˆูŽููุถู‘ูŽู„ ุจูู‡ ู…ู† ุฐูŽู„ููƒ ูƒูŽู…ูŽุง ู‚ูŽุฏู‘ู…ู’ู†ูŽุงู‡ ูููŠ ุงู„ู‚ูุณู’ู… ุงู„ุฃูˆู„ ูˆูŽูˆูุฌููˆุฏ ู…ูุซู’ู„ ุฐูŽู„ููƒ ู…ู† ุฑูŽุฌูู„ ู„ูŽู… ูŠูŽู‚ู’ุฑุฃ ูˆูŽู„ูŽู… ูŠูŽูƒู’ุชูุจ ูˆูŽู„ูŽู… ูŠูุฏุงุฑูุณ ูˆูŽู„ูŽุง ู„ูู‚ู‘ู† ู…ูู‚ู’ุชูŽุถูŽู‰ ุงู„ุนูŽุฌูŽุจ ูˆูŽู…ูู†ู’ุชูŽู‡ูŽู‰ ุงู„ู’ุนูุจูŽุฑ ูˆูŽู…ูุนู’ุฌูุฒูŽุฉ ุงู„ู’ุจูŽุดูŽุฑ ูˆูŽู„ูŽูŠู’ุณ ูููŠ ุฐูŽู„ููƒ ู†ูŽู‚ูŠุตูŽุฉ ุฅูุฐ ุงู„ู…ุทู„ูˆุจ ู…ูู† ุงู„ูƒูุชูŽุงุจูŽุฉ ูˆุงู„ู‚ุฑุงุกุฉ ุงู„ู…ูŽุนู’ุฑููŽุฉ ูˆูŽุฅูู†ู‘ูŽู…ูŽุง ู‡ูŠ ุขู„ุฉ.
    ู„ูŽู‡ูŽุง ูˆูŽูˆูŽุงุณูุทูŽุฉ ู…ููˆูŽุตู‘ู„ุฉ ุฅูู„ูŽูŠู’ู‡ูŽุง ุบูŽูŠู’ุฑ ู…ูุฑูŽุงุฏูŽุฉ ูููŠ ู†ูŽูู’ุณูู‡ูŽุง ููŽุฅูุฐูŽุง ุญูŽุตูŽู„ูŽุช ุงู„ุซู‘ูŽู…ู’ุฑูŽุฉ ูˆูŽุงู„ู…ูŽุทู’ู„ููˆุจ ุงุณู’ุชูุบู’ู†ููŠ ุนูŽู† ุงู„ู’ูˆูŽุงุณูุทูŽุฉ ูˆูŽุงู„ุณู‘ุจูŽุจุŒ ูˆูŽุงู„ู’ุฃูู…ู‘ูŠู‘ูŽุฉ ูููŠ ุบูŽูŠู’ุฑูู‡ ู†ูŽู‚ููŠุตูŽุฉ ู„ูุฃูŽู†ู‘ู‡ูŽุง ุณูŽุจูŽุจ ุงู„ู’ุฌูŽู‡ูŽุงู„ูŽุฉ ูˆูŽุนูู†ู’ูˆูŽุงู† ุงู„ู’ุบูŽุจูŽุงูˆูŽุฉ


    Similarly, that he did not learn to read and write [ummฤซ] is an attribute Allฤh tรกฤlฤ has mentioned in his ๏ทบ praise; and it is a superior attribute for him on account of the Qurโ€™ฤn which is the greatest of his miracles; because, the knowledge and wisdom that was revealed to him would not be possible except for a Messenger of God, [who brought all this] without having learned to read or write, nor was he taught or instructed โ€“ yet he brings such an eloquent and astonishing book, which defies description and is beyond the capacity of humans. Thus, mentioning that he is a ummi823 is not disparaging him โ€“ because after all, the purpose of learning to read and write is to augment oneโ€™s knowledge; thus it is an important tool and means to attain more knowledge. The ability to read or write is not a goal in itself, [rather, the objective is to attain knowledge using these tools]. When that objective [of knowledge] is present already without any need for means and tools, they become inconsequential. The inability to read or write is a flaw for others, because they remain ignorant and gullible because of their illiteracy.

    - end of quote (from Al-Shifa bi Ta'rif Huquq al-Mustafa 2/249 - 250) -

    Comment

    Working...
    X