Originally posted by Passer_By
View Post
Ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab (d. 1206 AH) came up with a fake Tawhid and fake Shirk in order to be able to call the Muslims of his time as polytheists, so that his beloved Al Sa'ud can slaughter Muslims and take over their lands. Unfortunately brothers like you have been fooled and brainwashed by the servants of Al Sa'ud and do not realize that these Najdis were simply a bunch of ignorant criminals.
I told you that we should make the revelation of Allah ta'ala a judge between us, but you're keeping on making the Khurafat of IAW a judge upon us.
The issue of Tawassul, Tashaffu' and Istighatha is an inner-Islamic difference of opinion (with Tawassul and Tashaffu' being allowed by almost everyone, while Istighatha is differed upon based upon what one intends by it) and to make this issue an issue of Iman and Kufr based upon which blood is spilled is nothing but evil.
Do you even know what the scholars of the 4 Madhahib said regarding these issues before rushing to these rulings? Do you know that the majority of the Muslims of the past - including the leading scholars! - regarded it as good to ask the Messenger of Allah (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) for intercession (meaning: to ask him to supplicate to Allah ta'ala regarding the forgiveness of one's sins) during the visitation of his blessed grave? Go and read any major Fiqh book and see what is stated there!
Then:
Our noble Prophet (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) stated that Surat al-Ikhlas is equal to one-third of the Qur`an al-karim. There are clear proofs that Tawhid is what is stated in this blessed Sura! Now this is true Tawhid, but according to the ideas of that IAW this Aya would not be enough Tawhid!
So tell us! The one who believes in Surat al-Ikhlas, is it enough for him to be regarded a monotheist or do you require from him more than that?
Comment