Ads by Muslim Ad Network

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How to Spot a Feminist Quack "Scholar"

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • How to Spot a Feminist Quack "Scholar"

    Excerpts from "Women, Mosques, Eidgah, and the Deception of the Feminist Charlatan "Scholars":

    "...Chicanery and deceit are qualities that are ingrained in the disposition of all of these feminist charlatan “scholars”. While they harp on about Rasulullah’s (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) command not to prevent women from the Masjids, they all maintain a spectacularly deafening silence on the pre-conditions which Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) himself had set for their attendance.

    Scour through the Ghutha (trash) verbiage of these feminists who fraudulently claim to follow Rasulullah’s (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) teachings authentically and one cannot help but notice that every single command of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) pertaining to women which does not conform with the Kuffaar cult of life, is vividly conspicuous by its absence.

    How many of these feminist deviate scholars expend any effort and how much of their Ghutha (trash) is devoted to exhorting women to emerge only in the state of being “Tafilaat” as explicitly commanded by Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam)? How much of their Ghutha is expended in explaining what “Tafilaat” actually entails according to the experts of the Arabic language? How much of their Ghutha is devoted to emphasizing Rasulullah’s (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) explicit command to women to adhere to the edges of the path, as a result of which the noble female Sahaabiyyaat (radhiyallahu anhunna) would scrape their outer garments against the walls? How much of their Ghutha is expended in re-iterating Rasulullah’s (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) explicit declaration that a woman who emerges outside smelling of any form of fragrant scent, is an adulteress whose Salaat is rejected until she performs the Ghusl of Janaabah (ritual purification required after intercourse)? How much of their Ghutha is disgorged in expounding on the prohibition of men and women being in close proximity even on the roads, leave aside the vicinity of the most sanctified places in the world? How much of their Ghutha is used to clarify the fact that the noble Sahaabiyaat (female companions) would generally attend the mosques in intense darkness, wrapped up in entirety in their worn-out and tattered outer garments, with none being able to recognise the other, and that they would flee from the mosque immediately after Salaat while the male Sahabah (radhiyallahu anhum) would remain seated until all trace of the generally elderly women had vanished?

    And, how much of their Ghutha is devoted to any of the countless other commands of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) which are in complete conflict with, and wholly unpalatable to the values of Kufr which lurk in the inner recesses of their hearts?

    The deception and misrepresentation of our Deen perpetrated by such charlatan scholars are made even more acutely conspicuous by the fact that all of the aforementioned commands of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), and other similar commands pertaining to women, are violated, en masse, to an epidemic degree never before witnessed by the Ummah.

    In reality, it is the hidden disdain (Kufr) for these clear commands of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) which do not accord with their Kufr worldview, which constrains them to seal their lips firmly shut whilst simultaneously being able to whine pathetically, with deafening loudness, about a Fatwa of prohibition which was initiated by none other than those who were the closest to Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), and who understood and submitted to his teachings the best.

    In vivid contrast to the Ghutha disgorged in chorus by these feminist deviates, the books of the Fuqaha are faithful to Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and replete with all of the aforementioned commands, much of which would naturally be unpalatable today, as indicated by Rasulullah’s (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) prophecy that the true Deen will eventually become Ghareeb (lone, isolated, forlorn)....

    The fraudulent so-called Hanbalis of this era, both the Salafi and fraudulent “Sufi” varieties, who cite some latter-day Hanbali authorities which contradict this explicit Fatwa of Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal issued during the most blessed of eras, NEVER utter even a whisper on some of the prerequisites for attendance mentioned by these latter-day Hanbali authorities, which women today, en masse, utterly fail in fulfilling. Imam al-Buhooti, for example, defines the pre-condition of “Tafilaat” precisely in accordance with the experts in the Arabic language as, “When her smell becomes pungent as a result of leaving out applying fragrance or applying oil.”, and Allamah Qudamah includes as a prerequisite the wearing of old, worn and tattered garments (bizlah). Furthermore, ALL the Fuqaha agree that a necessary pre-requisite for permission for women to attend the Masjid is the absence of Fitnah and Fasaad amongst the vilest of which is free-mixing, which includes when going into and leaving the mosques.

    Is there any mosque in the world, or any other public place at which both men and women gather, where the men and women display even the slightest capacity or faintest hope of avoiding the vilest aspects of Fitnah and Fasaad (immoral corruption) to which these Feminist Devils have become thoroughly desensitized and oblivious, such as free-mixing when entering and leaving the public premises, lowering the gazes, women failing miserably in attending as "Tafilaat", in clothes that have been described by the Salaf-us-Saaliheen and Fuqaha with such words as "Bizlah", "al-Atmaar", "al-Ma-aayiz", "Khulqaan", "Khashina Thiyaabiha" (in summary: old, shabby, worn-out, rough clothing), etc. which vividly depict what they really meant by subjective terms such as "Ghair Mutatayyibaat" and "Ghair Mutazayyinaat", and the other necessary and non-negotiable prerequisites for attendance which the noble Sahaabiyyaat (radhiyallahu anhunna) used to fulfil?...

    Why do these feminist charlatans even bother with the likes of Allamah Ibn Hazm or Allamah Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani when even much of their teachings on this issue would be regarded as misogynistic according to the libertine cult of the West to which these charlatans have fully submitted (tasleem)? Why do these charlatans even bother trawling through our vast tradition, dismissing and mocking the rulings of the Fuqaha on the way, and searching desperately for an anomalous scrap or two that conform closest with the values of Kufr embedded in their hearts, and even then having to distort and mutilate those scraps? Why do they not come out into the open and declare loudly and clearly, “This is my own personal Deen, and that is the Deen of the Fuqaha and the Salaf-us-Saaliheen.”?

    The obvious answer is that even these charlatans realise that a great proportion of their market, the masses to whom these charlatans are fully dependent on for money and adulation, still possess the belief that the true Deen is somehow tied to the Salaf-us-Saaliheen and the great Fuqaha of the past, hence the need for them (i.e. the feminists) to scavenge like hungry dogs for the anomalous and erroneous slips of the Fuqaha....

    While the narration of Hadhrat Aatikah bint Zayd (radhiyallahu anha) attending the Masjid, and the narrations of other elderly “Tafilaat” cited in a selectively half-baked manner by the feminist fraudsters, poses absolutely no problems for us, they backfire flatly in the faces of these charlatans, and reveal the Nafsaaniyyaat – base desires fully submitted to Kuffaar values – that is the core foundational basis of their entire “Deen”.

    On what other basis do these feminist Charlatans have the audacity to even cite Hadhrat Aatikah’s (radhiyallahu anha) presence at the Masjid at the time of the martyrdom of her husband (radhiyallahu anhu), leave aside using it as a Mustadal (proof), when this particular information has reached us only in the form of a disconnected narration, while the authenticity of every other authentic Hadith confirmed and accepted by the entire Ummah, but unpalatable to the Kuffaar, is assaulted on the slightest whimsical basis? On what other basis do these fraudsters reject the fully-connected and authentic narration of Hadhrat Aishah (radhiyallahu anha) as it has been understood by the entire Ummah? On what other basis do those fraudsters who concede the authenticity of the narration of Hadhrat Aishah (radhiyallahu anha) dismiss the understanding of the galaxy of Mujtahideen and Fuqaha of the entire Ummah regarding it, and proceed instead to scavenge like hungry dogs for an anomalous scrap or two such as the one dropped by Allamah Ibn Hazm which Allamah Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani merely regurgitated? On what other basis do these dishonest fraudsters who pounce on the anomalous couple of scraps left for them by Allamah Ibn Hazm and Allamah Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani, then proceed to ignore, dismiss, and even commit blatant Tahreef (distort) of the rest of the teachings of these two Fuqaha, such as the prohibition of women emerging EXCEPT as “Tafilaat” which Allamah Ibn Hazm defines aptly as “foul-smelling and clothing“? On what basis do these feminist fraudsters ignore the fully-connected and authentic narration of one of the most senior Sahabah (radhiyallahu anhu), Hadhrat Abdullah ibn Mas’ood (radhiyallahu anhu), expelling the women from the Masjid and instructing the Sahabah (radhiyallahu anhum) and Tabi’een to “Keep them out from where Allah had expelled them from”?

    And, on what basis do these quacks ignore and suppress the facts evident from the very narrations that they cite, such as the fact that Hadhrat Aatikah (radhiyallahu anha) was an elderly woman (al-Ajooz) of impeccable piety who would only attend the Masjid as “tafilat“, during times of intense darkness, fulfilling all the other necessary pre-conditions for attendance set by Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) with absolute perfection, and yet, still, the greatest of men on Earth at the time displayed so much disinclination and Ghairah towards her attendance?...

    The Shafi’i authority, Allamah Taqi ud-Deen al-Hisni states that only a Ghabi (a moron suffering from extreme density of brains) would fail to understand the applicability of Hadhrat Aishah’s (radhiyallahu anha) explicit Fatwa for an age in which the pre-conditions for women’s attendance are violated to an infinitely greater degree than the relatively more minor violations that had occurred during the era of Hadhrat Aishah’s (radhiyallahu anha) - a self-evident reality which Allamah Ibn Hajar al-Haythami emphatically declared to be accepted by Ijma' (Consensus) in his age around 400 years ago:

    "It has been authentically transmitted from Aishah that she said, “If Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had to see what women have introduced, he would most certainly prohibit them from the Masjid just as the women of Bani Israaeel were prohibited.’ This then is the Fatwa of Ummul Mu’mineen in the best of ages. Then what should be (the fatwa) in this corrupt time of ours?….And this (difference of opinion regarding women’s attendance) applied to that (early) age. But during this era of ours, not a single Muslim will hesitate to prohibit women except a Ghabi (an ignoramus/moron whose brains are dense) who lacks understanding of the deeper wisdom of the Shariah….The correct ruling is resolutely Tahreem (i.e. it is haraam for women to attend the Musjid). And the Fatwa is according to it.” (Kifaayat ul-Akhyaar)

    We add to the above statement that in this worst of eras in which every form of Fitnah, Fasaad, and transgressions of the Shariah is infinitely more glaringly manifest than in Taqi ud-Deen's and Allamah Ibn Hajar al-Haythami's era, not even a Ghabi (an extremely dense and damaged brain cell) would fail to issue a Fatwa of complete and absolute prohibition. It is only a particularly evil specimen from the satanic species known as the Aimmah Mudhilleen (scholars who will drag countless people with them into the depths of Jahannum) who would issue such a Fatwa designed for a non-existent group of women, extinct long long ago, by which the doors are opened for countless women to transgress the Ijma’ of ALL the Fuqaha of the Ummah including even the likes of Allamah Ibn Hazm, that minus the fulfilment of a whole host of stringent pre-conditions set by Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) himself, women must be barred from attending the Masjid..."

    Disclaimer: "Feminist deviates" refer to the liberal secularist "scholars" who seek to reform the Deen according to the values and norms of the Kuffaar.
    RELIABLE FATWAS

  • #2
    They are the one if the many types of agents of shaytaan sent to corrupt Islam using tricks that only fool the absolute deviant or ignorant

    Comment


    • #3
      Who are the feminist scholars? Names?
      And who wrote this article? And what is saying in summary? Women should be banned from the masjid even though the prophet ﷺ allowed it?
      شَكَوْتُ إلَى وَكِيعٍ سُوءَ حِفْظِي
      فَأرْشَدَنِي إلَى تَرْكِ المعَاصي
      وَأخْبَرَنِي بأَنَّ العِلْمَ نُورٌ
      ونورُ الله لا يهدى لعاصي

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Rumaysah~ View Post
        Who are the feminist scholars? Names?
        And who wrote this article? And what is saying in summary? Women should be banned from the masjid even though the prophet ﷺ allowed it?
        Women are allowed to go to the masaajid. However, there are conditions they must fulfill. Below in an extract from a correct fatwa here which you can read:

        These texts clearly indicate that if the Muslim woman adheres to proper Islamic etiquette in her dress and avoids adorning herself in ways that will provoke fitnah and affect those of weak faith, there is no reason why she should not pray in the mosque. If she appears in such a way that evil people and those in whose heart is a disease will be tempted by her, then she is not allowed to enter the mosque, rather she is not allowed to leave her home and attend the mosque.
        Watch those eyes

        Comment


        • #5
          Don't give this retard any attention.
          You think you know more than my scholar's qiyās? He was more learned than you and all other scholars combined. Yeah, the devil was the greatest scholar too and look where his qiyās of fire being better than tīn got him. Sorry.

          You follow your scholar's qiyās, and I will follow the Qur'ān and Sunnah.

          Comment

          Working...
          X