Ads by Muslim Ad Network

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why Choose Polygamy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why Choose Polygamy

    Let us now tackle the important question of polygany. Polygany is a very ancient practice found in many human societies. The Bible did not condemn polygany. To the contrary, the Old Testament and Rabbinic writings frequently attest to the legality of polygany. King Solomon is said to have had 700 wives and 300 concubines (1 Kings 11:3) Also, king David is said to have had many wives and concubines (2 Samuel 5:13). The Old Testament does have some injunctions on how to distribute the property of a man among his sons from different wives (Deut. 22:7). The only restriction on polygany is a ban on taking a wife's sister as a rival wife (Lev. 18:18). The Talmud advises a maximum of four wives. 51 European Jews continued to practice polygany until the sixteenth century. Oriental Jews regularly practiced polygany until they arrived in Israel where it is forbidden under civil law. However, under religious law which overrides civil law in such cases, it is permissible. 52

    What about the New Testament? According to Father Eugene Hillman in his insightful book, Polygany reconsidered, "Nowhere in the New Testament is there any explicit commandment that marriage should be monogamous or any explicit commandment forbidding polygany." 53 Moreover, Jesus has not spoken against polygany though it was practiced by the Jews of his society. Father Hillman stresses the fact that the Church in Rome banned polygany in order to conform to the Greco-Roman culture (which prescribed only one legal wife while tolerating concubinage and prostitution). He cited St. Augustine, "Now indeed in our time, and in keeping with Roman custom, it is no longer allowed to take another wife." 54 African churches and African Christians often remind their European brothers that the Church's ban on polygany is a cultural tradition and not an authentic Christian injunction.

    The Quran, too, allowed polygany, but not without restrictions:

    "If you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; but if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly with them, then only one" (Quran 4:3).

    The Quran, contrary to the Bible, limited the maximum number of wives to four under the strict condition of treating the wives equally and justly.
    Why is polygany permissible ? The answer is simple: there are places and times in which there are compelling social and moral reasons for polygany. As the above Quranic verse indicates, the issue of polygany in Islam cannot be understood apart from community obligations towards orphans and widows. Islam as a universal religion suitable for all places and all times could not ignore these compelling obligations.
    In most human societies, females outnumber males. In the U.S. there are, at least, eight million more women than men. In a country like Guinea there are 122 females for every 100 males. In Tanzania, there are 95.1 males per 100 females. 55 What should a society do towards such unbalanced sex ratios? There are various solutions, some might suggest celibacy, others would prefer female infanticide (which does happen in some societies in the world today !). Others may think the only outlet is that the society should tolerate all manners of sexual permissiveness: prostitution, sex out of wedlock, homosexuality, etc. For other societies , like most African societies today, the most honorable outlet is to allow polyganous marriage as a culturally accepted and socially respected institution. The point that is often misunderstood in the West is that women in other cultures do not necessarily look at polygany as a sign of women's degradation. For example, many young African brides , whether Christians or Muslims or otherwise, would prefer to marry a married man who has already proved himself to be a responsible husband. Many African wives urge their husbands to get a second wife so that they do not feel lonely. 56 A survey of over six thousand women, ranging in age from 15 to 59, conducted in the second largest city in Nigeria showed that 60 percent of these women would be pleased if their husbands took another wife. Only 23 percent expressed anger at the idea of sharing with another wife. Seventy-six percent of the women in a survey conducted in Kenya viewed polygany positively. In a survey undertaken in rural Kenya, 25 out of 27 women considered polygany to be better than monogamy. These women felt polygany can be a happy and beneficial experience if the co-wives cooperate with each other. 57 Polygany in most African societies is such a respectable institution that some Protestant churches are becoming more tolerant of it. A bishop of the Anglican Church in Kenya declared that, "Although monogamy may be ideal for the expression of love between husband and wife, the church should consider that in certain cultures polygyny is socially acceptable and that the belief that polygyny is contrary to Christianity is no longer tenable." 58 After a careful study of African polygany, Reverend David Gitari of the Anglican Church has concluded that polygamy, as ideally practiced, is more Christian than divorce and remarriage as far as the abandoned wives and children are concerned. 59 I personally know of some highly educated African wives who, despite having lived in the West for many years, do not have any objections against polygamy. One of them, who lives in the U.S., solemnly exhorts her husband to get a second wife to help her in raising the kids.

    The problem of the unbalanced sex ratios becomes truly problematic at times of war. Native American Indian tribes used to suffer highly unbalanced sex ratios after wartime losses. Women in these tribes, who in fact enjoyed a fairly high status, accepted polygamy as the best protection against indulgence in indecent activities. European settlers, without offering any other alternative, condemned this Indian polygamy as 'uncivilised'. 60 After the second world war, there were 7,300,000 more women than men in Germany (3.3 million of them were widows). There were 100 men aged 20 to 30 for every 167 women in that age group. 61 Many of these women needed a man not only as a companion but also as a provider for the household in a time of unprecedented misery and hardship. The soldiers of the victorious Allied Armies exploited these women's vulnerability. Many young girls and widows had liaisons with members of the occupying forces. Many American and British soldiers paid for their pleasures in cigarettes, chocolate, and bread. Children were overjoyed at the gifts these strangers brought. A 10 year old boy on hearing of such gifts from other children wished from all his heart for an 'Englishman' for his mother so that she need not go hungry any longer. 62 We have to ask our own conscience at this point: What is more dignifying to a woman? An accepted and respected second wife as in the native Indians' approach, or a virtual prostitute as in the 'civilised' Allies approach? In other words, what is more dignifying to a woman, the Quranic prescription or the theology based on the culture of the Roman Empire?

    It is interesting to note that in an international youth conference held in Munich in 1948 the problem of the highly unbalanced sex ratio in Germany was discussed. When it became clear that no solution could be agreed upon, some participants suggested polygamy. The initial reaction of the gathering was a mixture of shock and disgust. However, after a careful study of the proposal, the participants agreed that it was the only possible solution. Consequently, polygamy was included among the conference final recommendations. 63

    The world today possesses more weapons of mass destruction than ever before and the European churches might, sooner or later, be obliged to accept polygamy as the only way out. Father Hillman has thoughtfully recognized this fact, "It is quite conceivable that these genocidal techniques (nuclear, biological, chemical..) could produce so drastic an imbalance among the sexes that plural marriage would become a necessary means of survival....Then contrary to previous custom and law, an overriding natural and moral inclination might arise in favour of polygamy. In such a situation, theologians and church leaders would quickly produce weighty reasons and biblical texts to justify a new conception of marriage." 64

    To the present day, polygamy continues to be a viable solution to some of the social ills of modern societies. The communal obligations that the Quran mentions in association with the permission of polygamy are more visible at present in some Western societies than in Africa. For example, In the United States today, there is a severe gender crisis in the black community. One out of every twenty young black males may die before reaching the age of 21. For those between 20 and 35 years of age, homicide is the leading cause of death. 65 Besides, many young black males are unemployed, in jail, or on dope. 66 As a result, one in four black women, at age 40, has never married, as compared with one in ten white women. 67 Moreover, many young black females become single mothers before the age of 20 and find themselves in need of providers. The end result of these tragic circumstances is that an increasing number of black women are engaged in what is called 'man-sharing'. 68 That is, many of these hapless single black women are involved in affairs with married men. The wives are often unaware of the fact that other women are 'sharing' their husbands with them. Some observers of the crisis of man-sharing in the African American community strongly recommend consensual polygamy as a temporary answer to the shortage of black males until more comprehensive reforms in the American society at large are undertaken. 69 By consensual polygamy they mean a polygamy that is sanctioned by the community and to which all the parties involved have agreed, as opposed to the usually secret man-sharing which is detrimental both to the wife and to the community in general. The problem of man-sharing in the African American community was the topic of a panel discussion held at Temple University in Philadelphia on January 27, 1993. 70 Some of the speakers recommended polygamy as one potential remedy for the crisis. They also suggested that polygamy should not be banned by law, particularly in a society that tolerates prostitution and mistresses. The comment of one woman from the audience that African Americans needed to learn from Africa where polygamy was responsibly practiced elicited enthusiastic applause.

    Philip Kilbride, an American anthropologist of Roman Catholic heritage, in his provocative book, Plural marriage for our time, proposes polygamy as a solution to some of the ills of the American society at large. He argues that plural marriage may serve as a potential alternative for divorce in many cases in order to obviate the damaging impact of divorce on many children. He maintains that many divorces are caused by the rampant extramarital affairs in the American society. According to Kilbride, ending an extramarital affair in a polygamous marriage, rather than in a divorce, is better for the children, "Children would be better served if family augmentation rather than only separation and dissolution were seen as options." Moreover, he suggests that other groups will also benefit from plural marriage such as: elderly women who face a chronic shortage of men and the African Americans who are involved in man-sharing. 71

    In 1987, a poll conducted by the student newspaper at the university of California at Berkeley asked the students whether they agreed that men should be allowed by law to have more than one wife in response to a perceived shortage of male marriage candidates in California. Almost all of the students polled approved of the idea. One female student even stated that a polyganous marriage would fulfil her emotional and physical needs while giving her greater freedom than a monogamous union. 72 In fact, this same argument is also used by the few remaining fundamentalist Mormon women who still practice polygamy in the U.S. They believe that polygamy is an ideal way for a woman to have both a career and children since the wives help each other care for the children. 73

    It has to be added that polygamy in Islam is a matter of mutual consent. No one can force a woman to marry a married man.The Bible, on the other hand, sometimes resorts to forcible polygamy. A childless widow must marry her husband's brother, even if he is already married (see the "Plight of Widows" section),regardless of her consent (Genesis 38:8-10).
    Billy Graham, the eminent Christian evangelist has recognized this fact: "Christianity cannot compromise on the question of polygamy. If present-day Christianity cannot do so, it is to its own detriment. Islam has permitted polygamy as a solution to social ills and has allowed a certain degree of latitude to human nature but only within the strictly defined framework of the law. Christian countries make a great show of monogamy, but actually they practice polygamy. No one is unaware of the part mistresses play in Western society. In this respect Islam is a fundamentally honest religion, and permits a Muslim to marry a second wife if he must, but strictly forbids all clandestine amatory associations in order to safeguard the moral probity of the community." 75

    It is of interest to note that many, non-Muslim as well as Muslim, countries in the world today have outlawed polygamy. Taking a second wife, even with the free consent of the first wife, is a violation of the law. On the other hand, cheating on the wife, without her knowledge or consent, is perfectly legitimate as far as the law is concerned! What is the legal wisdom behind such a contradiction? Is the law designed to reward deception and punish honesty? It is one of the unfathomable paradoxes of our modern 'civilised' world.


    There is no nobility in anyone who lacks faith.

    The wise man knows that the only fitting price for his soul is a place in Paradise.


  • #2
    Re: Why Choose Polygamy

    bump
    "O you who believe! Stand out firmly for justice, as witnesses to Allah, even as against yourselves, or your parents, or your kin, and whether it be (against) rich or poor: for Allah can best protect both. Follow not the lusts (of your hearts), lest you swerve, and if you distort (justice) or decline to do justice, verily Allah is well-acquainted with all that you do." [An-Nisa 4:135]

    The Prophet :saw: said:

    "Whosoever leaves off obedience and separates from the Jamaa'ah and dies, he dies a death of jaahiliyyah. Whoever fights under the banner of the blind, becoming angry for 'asabiyyah (nationalism/tribalism/partisanship) or calling to 'asabiyyah, or assisting 'asabiyyah, then dies, he dies a death of jaahiliyyah."

    muslim

    Narrated 'Abdullah:

    The Prophet, said, "Abusing a Muslim is Fusuq (evil doing) and killing him is Kufr (disbelief)." sahih bukhari


    "Creeping upon you is the diseases of those people before you: envy and hatred. And hatred is the thing that shaves. I do not say it shaves the hair but it shaves the religion!

    By the One in whose Hand is my soul, you will not enter paradise until you believe, and you will not believe until you love one another. Certainly, let me inform you of that which may establish such things: spread the greetings and peace among yourselves."

    [Recorded by Imam Ahmad and Al-Tirmidhi]

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Why Choose Polygany

      Originally posted by Al-Irhaab View Post
      [font=Arial][size=3]King Solomon is said to have had 700 wives and 300 concubines (1 Kings 11:3) Also, king David is said to have had many wives and concubines (2 Samuel 5:13).
      The entire article starts off with a horrible example. King Solomon was PUNISHED for having wives and concubines AGAINST God's instructions not to this. So that would be an argument against Polygamy, not for it.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Why Choose Polygany

        Originally posted by Mich View Post
        The entire article starts off with a horrible example. King Solomon was PUNISHED for having wives and concubines AGAINST God's instructions not to this. So that would be an argument against Polygamy, not for it.
        not for the act of polygamy itself you dingdong

        pretty sad when you don't even know your own bible yet you propogate it

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Why Choose Polygany

          Originally posted by Ibn Sina View Post
          not for the act of polygamy itself you dingdong

          pretty sad when you don't even know your own bible yet you propogate it
          He must not take many wives, or his heart will be led astray. He must not accumulate large amounts of silver and gold.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Why Choose Polygany

            The many sins that Solomon are well known and listed in bible, including but not limiting to the taking of many wives which was against GOD's orders.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Why Choose Polygany

              yeah there was a reason for that which you clearly lack the capacity to comprehend

              what verse states that you can't marry more than one wife at all?

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Why Choose Polygany

                I believe men have made women allergic to polygamy so only have themselves to blame. My Mum discovered in our building 4 women married to the same man living in one flat with the children. Seriously? And that's the second one there is another with two wives in one flat and living on benefits meaning my taxes.

                So maybe the "tackling" should be directed to these fellow brothers
                My Blog http://historyeyesopened.tumblr.com/ Watch out sister Nousername :o
                Ummah forum mentality depiction by BBC (warning) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LS37SNYjg8w

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Why Choose Polygany

                  Q : Why Choose Polygany ?

                  A :
                  survival of the fittest
                  or in our (muslim ummah) case, survival of the pious
                  confused ?
                  let me explain

                  marriage is simply an avenue for us towards attaining jannah
                  Allah () commanded "men are protectors of women" hence men are suppose to lead women towards attaining jannah
                  let's just say we grade men as "A", "B", "C" and "F"
                  the "A" grade men are the best men, ie the most pious, the best in akhlaq, the best in 'amal, etc
                  while the "F"s are failures

                  now, for women to have a better chance towards attaining jannah, they will have to choose "A" grade men rather than "B" or "C"
                  true ?
                  why choose an inferior man when you can have the best ?

                  now if the "A" grade men are all single, surely we don't have a problem
                  what if the "A" grade men are already married ? would you choose lesser graded men just because they are single ?
                  would a single "B" or "C" grade man better for your quest towards attaining jannah ?

                  consider this scenario :
                  on an island far far away, there lived 100 men & 100 women
                  10 are "A" grade men, 30 are "B" grade men, 50 are "C" grade men and 10 are "F" grade men
                  (note : no grading for the women as the will be followers of their husbands)

                  so the 10 "A" grade men marries 10 women, leaving 90 women yet to be married

                  now, the question arises again "would women choose lesser graded men just because they are single ?"
                  or do they think of jannah ?

                  hypothetically, a pious woman will want to choose "A" grade men as this allowed in islam
                  so another 10 choose to marry the "A" grade men in a polygynous setup while the rest are still thinking about it
                  then another 30 choose to marry the "B" grade men
                  now there a still 70 men & 50 women who are still unmarried, true ?

                  so the 50 women will be thinking "should we choose lesser graded men just because they are single or think of jannah ?"
                  let say, another 10 choose to marry the "A" grade men as 3rd wives

                  at the time the "C" grade men and "F" grade men would be starting to think "I have to improve myself if I ever want to get married"
                  while "B" grade men might be thinking to upgrade himself to become an "A" grade man if he ever want to get more wives

                  when all the men improves themselves, so we will have more "A" grade men than the rest

                  so in a way by applying polygyny we are actually motivating men to become better muslim, in a way we are creating a better ummah

                  Comment

                  Collapse

                  Edit this module to specify a template to display.

                  Working...
                  X