So Laylatul Qadr is when exactly, Hadith rejector?!
So Laylatul Qadr is when exactly, Hadith rejector?!
Goodvibe i am sure you are saying in your mind , of all people : i had to run into hitman on this site.
Exposed to the extreme STAMP .
Yes, because being Sunni, Shia or divided in any sect is against the teacings of Quranl al Hakeem.Originally Posted by al faqeer
Please Re-update your Signature
WowGoodvibe i am sure you are saying in your mind , of all people : i had to run into hitman on this site
Exposed to the extreme STAMP .
You know what is in the hearts of others.
Please Re-update your Signature
Brother Hitman,Goodvibe i am sure you are saying in your mind , of all people : i had to run into hitman on this site
Exposed to the extreme STAMP .
Its ok with me if you and other brothers and sisters call me Kaffir. In return I wont call them the same.
Because I know it is not you folks who will be sitting on the throne at the day of judgement.
Please Re-update your Signature
On the throne ?
Did anyone record that one please ?
daymn !
He believes in the god of paul who's in the shape of a man that sits on a chair in heaven.
Allaahumma aghninee bil 'ilm, wa zayyinnee bil hilm, wa akrimnee bit taqwaa, wa jammilnee bil 'aafiyah.
Allaahummaj'alnee khayram mimmaa yazhunnoon, wa laa tuaa'khidhnee bimaa yaqooloon, waghfirlee maa laa ya'lamoon.
Sisters: Please, do not send me pm's or wall messages if it's not for a necessity like a translation or a ruling etc, Jazaakunnallaahu Khayr.
Allahul Musta'aan .
the shia...
tch tch...
how dare the insult the great sahabas: Hadrat Umar, Abu Bakr and Uthman (RA)...and Ayesha (RA)!!!!!
Why they insult the sa7aaba is not we sunnis problem , if we start explaining it means we will go into certain fitna that took place and we will have to Judge and make statements about Sa7aaba and Ahlulbayt r.anhum ajma3een in a negative and positive light which is not up to us .
Not all of us do. Only the Ithna Ashari3a do that.
"No matter what color you are in Islam, you are a Muslim - you are a brother. - Malcom X (December 27, 1964)"
http://www.islamicweb.com/beliefs/cu...nsultwives.htm
Shi'ite Insults against the wives of the Holy Prophet
Dear Brothers and Sisters in Islam, Inshallah by the end of this article you will see that the Shi'ites not only Curse the Sahabah but they also Insult and Curse the wives of our holy Prophet (may peace be upon him and his wives). I know the Shi'ites say they love the family of the Prophet, but in their Ignorance and kufr they insult his wives by spreding their fabricated Shi'ite Hadeeths about them. What you will see Inshallah is some examples of the many Shi'ite Hadeeth and quotes from their schollars regarding the wives of the Prophet (may peace be upon him and his wives). Also, I would like to point out that no Muslim is even allowed to insult the wives of the Prophet as they were the Mothers of the Beleivers as mentioned in the Quran.
Al killini (a big Shi'ite schollar) assumes that The Companions of the prophet (http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif) had all turned disbeleivers after his death except three. He wrote "All the people rejected Islam after the death of the Prophet except three. I said "And who are these?" He said, "Al Miqudad ibn Awsad, Abu Dharr Al Ghifari and Salman the Persian. Heavenly mercy be on them all." (Osul Al Kafi; p: 655.) By this Shi'ite statement, we can see that the Shi'ites say that All of the Sahabah apostated except three! By this, not only are they insulting the Sahabah but they are also insulting the wives of the Prophet (http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif) since they were Sahabiat.
In the Shi'ite book called "Al safi Interpretation," it talks about what will happen when the so-called twelveth Imam will come, here is an example of what it contains... "When Our Kaim (12 Imam) gets up, Al Humiraa (i.e. Umm Al Momineen, Aishah (rd) will be raised from the dead so as to be whipped her due punichment, and so as to avenge the daugter of Muhammad (s.a.w): Fatimah (rd)" (Al Safi Interpretaition; vol 2, P:108) as you can see the Shi'ites trully are evil in their ways... Don't they know that insulting Aisha (rd) takes them outside Islam! (I will explain this later)
The same lie about Aisha (rd) is recorded in another Shi'ite book called: Haqul Yagheen (The Acertained Truth) "When our kaim (12 Imam) Shall come back, he will bring Aisha (rd) to life so as to torment her to avenge Fatimah (rd)" (Haqul Yagheen (The acetained Truth). In persian: p 139.) As you can see the Shi'ites harbor such a great hatred for the Prophet's (http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif) wives, the ones who are praised in Hadeeth and Qur'an.
Now as you can see the Shi'ites have wholely different religion compared to Islam, how can we as Muslims say that the ones who insult the prophets (http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif) wives are Muslims?? It does not make sense! Now if we said that the ones who insulted the wives of the Prophet (http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif) were Munafiqs (hypocrites) and Kafar's (disbeleivers) then I could understand your point.
Now my Brothers and Sisters in Islam, do you know the verdict for someone who insults the Prophet's (http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif) wives? I dont think so.. otherwise there would be a massive push to fight the Shi'ites lies about Islam! So let me show you Inshallah
Abu Saeed al-Khudri (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "The Messenger of Allah (s.a.w) said: Do not slander my Companions, for if one of you were to spend an amount of gold equivalent to the size of Mount Uhud, you would not even come halfway up to their level." (Reported by al-Bukhaari, al-Fath, no. 3379). So by slandering the Companions (Sahabah) you would be commiting Kufr! for Allah says in the Quran:
Say (O' Muhammed -s.a.w-): "Obey Allah and the Messenger, But if they turn away, then Allah does not Like the disbelivers." So by slandering the Companions, you are not obaying the Prophet (http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif) which is disobaying Allah! Can't those Shi'ites see the truth which is in front of their faces?
Imaam Ibn Hazm quoted a report with an isnad going back to Hishaam ibn Ammaar, who said: "I heard Maalik ibn Anas say: Whoever curses Abu Bakr should be whipped, and whoever curses Aaishah should be killed. He was asked, Why do you say that concerning (the one who curses) Aaishah? He said, Because Allaah says concerning Aaishah, may Allah be pleased with her (interpretation of the meaning):"Allaah forbids you from it [slander] and warns you not to repeat the like of it forever, if you are believers." (al-Noor 24:17)"
Abu Bakr ibn al-Arabi said: "Because the people who slandered Aaishah accused a pure and innocent person of immorality, then Allah exonerated her. So everyone who accuses her of that of which Allah has stated she is innocent is rejecting what Allah says, and everyone who rejects what Allah says is a kaafir. This is the opinion of Maalik, and the matter is very clear to those who have insight."
And let me finish off with this Hadeeth inshallah:
The Prophet said: "The best of my nation is my genaration, then those who follow them ,and then those who follow them." Sahih Bukhari
So how can we Insult someone who were more pious and who loved the Prophet (http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif) more than any other generation. All I say to the Shi'ites is Fear Allah and stop these insulting Lies about the Wives of the Prophet (s.a.w)
May Allah Guide the Shi'ites to the True Islam, and May Allah show us what the Shi'ites really are, Ameen.
http://www.islamicweb.com/beliefs/cults/ridda.htm
Abu Baker & Zakat-Evaders
Are we allowed to ignore our differences?
Some people might argue that we should forget all the differences no matter how significant they are and concentrate on the outside enemies of Islam. However, by looking at the life of the Sahaba, we find that we should work on both. Let us take a look at this story, just for example:
As the news of the Prophet's death spread, a number of tribes rebelled and refused to pay Zakat (poor-due), saying that this was due only to the Prophet . At the same time a number of impostors claimed that the prophethood had passed to them after Muhammad and they raised the standard of revolt. To add to all this, two powerful empires, the Eastern Roman and the Persian, also threatened the new-born Islamic state at Medina.
Under these circumstances, many Companions of the Prophet, including Umar, advised Abu Bakr to make concessions to the Zakat evaders, at least for a time. They told him to accept their prayer from them and leave it up to Allah to judge them for denying Zakat. The new Caliph disagreed. He insisted that the Divine Law cannot be divided, that there is no distinction between the obligations of Zakat and Salat (prayer), and that any compromise with the injunctions of God would eventually erode the foundations of Islam. Umar and others were quick to realize their error of judgment. The revolting tribes attacked Medina but the Muslims were prepared. Abu Bakr himself led the charge, forcing them to retreat. He then made a relentless war on the false claimants to prophethood, most of whom submitted and again professed Islam.
The threat from the Roman Empire had actually arisen earlier, during the Prophet's lifetime. The Prophet had organized an army under the command of Usama, the son of a freed slave. The army had not gone far when the Prophet had fallen ill so they stopped. After the death of the Prophet , the question was raised whether the army should be sent again or should remain for the defense of Medina. Again Abu Bakr showed a firm determination. He said, "I shall send Usama's army on its way as ordered by the Prophet, even if I am left alone."
To make the long story short, we can see from this example that we should work on both sides at the same time. Abu Baker (may Allah be pleased with him) did not agree to make a treaty with the Arabic tribes nor delay sending the army to attack the Roman Empire. He had a STRONG BELIEF in Allah and this is what we LACK nowadays. So let's remember: our unity should be based on the Qur'an and Sunnah. There can be NO victory if we try to achieve it AT THE EXPENSE of the Qur'an and Sunnah.
May Allah guide Muslims and unite them. May He grant us victory over all enemies of Islam.
http://www.islamicweb.com/beliefs/cu...ia_history.htm
The History of the Shia
The religion of the Shiah was founded by a Jew from Yemen called Abdullah bin Saba'. This religion has started with the assassination of the rightly guided Khalifa Uthman and branched into many sections.
Uthman ruled for twelve years. The first six years were marked by internal peace and tranquility, but during the second half of his caliphate a rebellion arose. The Jews and the Magians, taking advantage of dissatisfaction among the people, began conspiring against Uthman, and by publicly airing their complaints and grievances, gained so much sympathy that it became difficult to distinguish friend from foe.
It may seem surprising that a ruler of such vast territories, whose armies were matchless, was unable to deal with these rebels. If Uthman had wished, the rebellion could have been crushed at the very moment it began. But he was reluctant to be the first to shed the blood of Muslims (especially Sahaba), however rebellious they might be. No one would ever expected what happend later. He preferred to reason with them, to persuade them with kindness and generosity. He well remembered hearing the Prophet (may Peace Be Upon Him) say, "Once the sword is unsheathed among my followers, it will not be sheathed until the Last Day."
The rebels demanded that he abdicate and some of the Companions advised him to do so. He would gladly have followed this course of action, but again he was bound by a solemn pledge he had given to the Prophet. "Perhaps God will clothe you with a shirt, Uthman" the Prophet had told him once, "and if the people want you to take it off, do not take it off for them." Uthman said to a well-wisher on a day when his house was surrounded by the rebels, "God's Messenger made a covenant with me and I shall show endurance in adhering to it."
After a long siege, the rebels broke into Uthman's house and murdered him. When the first assassin's sword struck Uthman, he was reciting the verse: "Verily, God sufficeth thee; He is the All-Hearing, the All-Knowing" [2:137]
Ali accepted the caliphate very reluctantly. Uthman's murder and the events surrounding it were a symptom, and also became a cause, of civil strife on a large scale. All governors gave the pledge to Ali except Muawiya, the governor of Sham (Great Syria). Muawiya declined to obey until Uthman's blood was avenged. His decision was based on the fact that he is not required to obey the Caliph until he (Ali) is able to enforce the rule of Allah. Muawiya was the cuisine of 'Uthman, so he was the responsible of asking Ali to bring the murderers to trial. The Prophet's widow Aisha also took the position that Ali should first bring the murderers to trial. Due to the chaotic conditions during the last days of Uthman it was very difficult to establish the identity of the murderers, and Ali refused to punish anyone whose guilt was not lawfully proved.
The pretext for the meeting of the armies on the day of the Camel and the day of Siffin was the demand for `Uthman's killers on the part of `A'isha and Mu`awiya, but the winds of war were fanned by the followers of Abdullah bin Saba' the Jew, from inside all three camps until events escaped the control of the Companions. It is related that `Ali, `A'isha , and Mu`awiya often expressed astonishment at the dissension and opposition that surrounded them.
After that some Shia declared Ali as a god. He then burned them alive with fire. After the killing of Abdullah bin Saba', Shia were divided into many new sects. Each one has its own Imam.
The Seveners or Isma'ilis, like all Shiites, believe that the descendants of Muhammad, through his daughter Fatima and her husband Ali the fourth Caliph, are the rightful rulers of the Muslim world. Thus the descendants of Ali are considered infallible and as divinely guided as Muhammad himself. This sect derives its name from Isma'il, the eldest son of the sixth Imam, Jafar as-Sadiq. In 762 CE, Isma'il died before his father, which resulted in bitter disputes of succession. The minority of Shiites regarded the old line of Imams extinct and chose Isma'il's eldest son as the new Imam. Thus they proclaimed a cycle of seven Imams, Ali being the first and Isma'il the seventh, and thus the seventh Imam after his line of Imams would be the Mahdi, or Messiah, or the seventh after him, etc..
The Isma'ilis have usually been small in numbers, but well organised and disciplined. Soon they developed into a cult, borrowing various ideas from Jewish mysticism, Greek philosophy, Babylonian astrology, Christian Gnosticism, etc.., When secular sciences were being employed in the Abbasid Empire, the Isma'ilis were thriving, and managed to recruit a large number of followers, who formed a well organised guerrilla army. By combining their scholarly skills and extraordinary underground network of spies, the Isma'ilis established their anti-Caliph in Egypt during the 10th century. They named his dynasty after Muhammad's daughter, and thus the name Fatimids emerged. In reality they are the dynasty of a Jew called Abdullah bin Qaddah, and that was they were called Abidi too. The Abidi State in Egypt quickly expanded and soon the Isma'ilis controlled western Syria and a large part of North Africa, killing thousands of Muslims. They also built a new capital, Fustat, near the ancient Pyramids, which in a few centuries grew to be the largest city in the Muslim world, under the name of Cairo.
When the Abidi dynasty was destroyed by the Abbasids, the Isma'ilis split into two sub-sects, Tayibiya and Niziriya, named after two Abidi princes. The former sect was soon transformed into a esoteric cult, which moved its activities underground and became invisible. The Niziriya sect transformed itself back into the pre-Abidi Isma'ilism, developing a network of agents and spies all over the Muslim world. The best known organization within the Niziriya was probably the drug-abusing Assassin sect, notorious for assassinations all over the Muslim world. Today, however, the Niziriya sect has turned pacifist and increasingly Westernized.
Out of the Assassin stronghold in Syria, two heterodox sub-sects have survived, the Alawite and the Druze. The Alawite sect is militant and combines radical theories from both Isma'il and Ithna Shia. The Druzes, on the other hand, have until more recently been more pacifistic, waiting for the return of their Mahdi, the psychotic Abidi Caliph al-Hakim, who 'disappeared' when he burned down his capital around 1000 CE. In the 13th century the Druzes closed their sect, and became a distinct tribe or nation. They serve today in the Israeli army against Palestinian Muslims.
The largest sect within Shia is the Ithna or Twelver, which follows the original line of Imams. When the Seveners chose the son of Isma'il to become the Imam, the majority of Shiites chose Isma'ils younger brother, Muza al-Kazim, as the seventh Imam. The Ithna adopt their 'Twelver' name from their belief in the twelfth Imam, Muhammad ibn al-Askari, who 'disappeared' one day and thus became the hidden Mahdi who would return to earth at the end of days. The 'Twelvers' worship their Imams, sometimes as the incarnation of Ali or Hussain. They form the vast majority of Shiites, including most Iranians and almost 50% of the Iraqi nation.
The third largest body in Shia is the Zaydi sect or the Fivers, prevailing in Yemen and among some Bedouin tribes in Saudi-Arabia. The Zaydi sect is more or less the deification of the 7th century Arabian culture, and it fiercely denounces the semi-divinity of Imams, contrary to the Twelver. Their founder was the fifth Imam, Zayd ibn Abidin, who was a rationalist and thus denounced his alleged divinity. The Zaydi Imams are more like Bedouin sheikhs than divine authorities, and thus reject hereditary leadership, and are only visible during warfare.
There are said to be more than 70 small Shia sects all around the world. Probably the best example of these was the Bahai sect, which has been persecuted and refuted as anti-Islamic, but grows fast as a separate religion, basing its doctrines on 'world peace and harmony' and the unity of all religions. The center of the Bahai sect is in Israel!
http://www.islamicweb.com/beliefs/cu..._answering.htm
Answering Shi'ism
Shi'ite see that Jews are better than Muslims:
This Ummah (nation) is the best among all nations. The best of this nation is the first generation (people at the time of the prophet http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif). Although those people are the most perfect people by their righteous follow to the Sunnah of the prophet http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif, Shia claimed that those people are kāfirs (disbelieves in Islam) and were not following the truth even though they knew it! Whereas since Allah said about Jews (after all the corruption that they did):
"Of the people of Moses there is a section who guide and do justice in the light of truth." (Qur'an 7:159)And whereas none of this Ummahas the Shia claim follow the truthdo justice in the light of truth, then Jews are better than Muslims! Clearly Jews and Christians respect their prophets more than the Rāfida:
Imam Sha3bi asked the Jews: "who is the best among your nation?" They said: "the companions of Moses." Then he asked the Christians so they replied: "the apostles of Jesus." Then he asked the Rāfida "who is the worst among your nation?" They said: "the Companions of Muhammad"
Obviously those Rāfida are included in the meaning of this Ayah:
Have you not seen those who were given a portion of the Book? They believe in Sorcery and Evil and say to the unbelievers that they are better guided in the (right) way than the Believers!Shia champion and assist Kafirs against Muslims:
They are those whom Allah has cursed, and he whom Allah curses, you will not find for him (any) helper (Qur'an 4:51)
When the Mongols invaded the Islamic world, Shia provided a strong support to them against Muslims. Shia helped the Christian crusaders against Muslims. When Jews established a state in north of Iraq, Shia were the greater supporters to them. Iran today supports al-Gaddafi (president of Libya) who is very anti-Islamic.
On the other hand, the Sunni Muslims (Ahl-us-Sunnah) are those who uphold the Qur'aan and the Hadeeth (Sunnah). It is through them that Allah has protected Islam. They are those who engaged in Jihad for the glory and dignity of Islam and established the glorious history of Islam.
Why Shia curse the wives of the prophet and his companions?
The one who curses the wives of the prophet and his companions is:
Remember that Abu-Bakr and Umar (may Allah be pleased with them) were the closest companions to Muhammad http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif as all references indicates and Allah confirmed in the Qur'an. His good treat to them is very well known to Shia. They were both fathers-in-law of the Prophet and his right hand. So, if the Shia claim were correct then we have three possible situations:
- Either a irreligious anti-Islamic hypocrite who make a defamation against them as a way of slandering the prophet http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif and as a scheme to attack Islam. All the founders of the Shia's movements belong to this group. Note that not any one of Ahlul-Bayt belong to those Shia.
- Or an inattentive who follows his act according to one's own wishes and ignorant. Almost all the Shia today belong to this group.
By insulting the wives and the companions of the Prophet http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif, clearly the Shia want people to say: "Muhammad was a wanton man among wanton companions. If he were a virtuous man then his companions will be virtuous people too." The Shia curse the Companions who are the righteous pattern to this Ummah and Allah bear witness for that:
- Either they were hypocrites and the Prophet http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif did not know that. This is a great insult to Allah since he did not warn his Messenger from his closest companions.
- Or they were hypocrites and the Prophet http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif knew that. This is even worst since they are insulting the Prophet http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif by claiming that he did not warn his nation from those hypocrites and he made them his relatives.
- Or they were good Muslims and they went astray after his death. This is abandonment from Allah to his messenger since He did not tell him what would happen in the future to warn the Muslim Ummah. How come Allah who promised to support his religion and his messenger, make to closest companions to his prophet renegades and hypocrites?!
(Some part is due) to the indigent Muhajirs (the Companions who emigrated from Mecca), those who were expelled from their homes and their property, while seeking Grace from Allah and (His) Good Pleasure, and aiding Allah and His Messenger: such are indeed the sincere ones;Contradiction in Shi'ism
But those who, before them, had homes (in Medina) and had adopted the Faith, show their affection to such as came to them for refuge, and entertain no desire in their hearts for things given to the (latter), but give them preference over themselves, even though poverty was their (own lot). And those saved from the covetousness of their own souls; they are the ones that achieve prosperity.
And those who came after them say: "Our Lord! Forgive us, and our brethren who came before us into the Faith, and leave not, in our hearts, rancour (or sense of injury) against those who have believed. Our Lord! Thou art indeed Full of Kindness, Most Merciful." (Qur'an Hashr: 8-10)
Shia cusses Abu-Bakr and his daughter Aisha, the wife of the prophet http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif, but they regard his son since he fought with Ali. So, they hate the best one in this Ummah after The Prophet and they regard his son who does not have any contribution in raising Islam.
Shia also claim that they love the family of the Prophet http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif, but they curse his wives who are the most important part of his family!
Why cussing the Companions (Sahābah) of The Prophet http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif is very dangerous?
Because the Companions of The Prophet http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif are those who are denigrating and demolishing Islam. For, indeed, it is the Sahābah (my Allah be pleased with them) who are the ones through whom Islam has been passed down to us. So those people who curse and insult them, in reality, are destroying Islam.
During a class of Imaam Maalik, it was mentioned that the Raafidite Shi`ites curse the Sahaabah. In reply, he quoted the Quranic verse, "Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah and those with him are harsh with the disbelievers and gentle among themselves. So that the disbelievers may become enraged with them." He then said, "Whoever becomes enraged when the Sahaabah are mentioned is one about whom the verse speaks." So, anyone who is enraged by the mention of the Sahaabah is a dsibeliever, because the verse says, " the disbelievers may become enraged with them (Sahaabah)."
Shia curses the Rightly Guided Khalifas (May Allah be pleased with them)
If they had any sense, they would know and appreciate that they are in reality cursing the Holy Prophet http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif himself. Abu Bakr and Umar were both fathers-in-law of the Prophet. Also, during the lifetime of the Prophet both were his right hand men; and after his demise, it is they who had great worry feeling for the welfare of Islam. Who else has ever been honored with such a position and honor as was granted to these two? Again, it is these two who had always participated and had been with the Prophet during all the battles. These facts are enough to refute the Shia beliefs.
As for Uthmaan, he was the husband to two daughters of the Prophet. It is clear that Allah does not choose for His Messenger a son-in-law and companions except those who are the best.
If the Rafida (Shia) are true to their claims, then could they explain why The Messenger http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif did not forewarn the Ummah and clarify the alleged enmity of the Rightly Guided Khalifas (i.e. Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthmaan) towards Islam?
Allah bears witness in the Qur'an that Abu Bakr is a close companion to the prophet Muhammad http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif by his saying:"If ye help not (Muhammad http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif), (it is no matter): for Allah did indeed help him, when the Unbelievers drove him out: he had no more than one companion (Abu Bakr): they two were in the Cave, and he said to his companion, Have no fear for Allah is with us." (9:40)Shia curses Ali (May Allah be pleased with him)
Their insults and curses are not limited just to the Rightly Guided Khalifas but are also directed towards Ali. Because Ali himself, in Masjid Rabia, gave the oath of allegiance (bai'ah) to Abu Bakr and also gave his daughter, Umm Kulthum in marriage to Umar. He also willingly gave the oath of allegiance (bai'ah) to Uthmaan. Not only this, but he was actually the right hand man and a well wisher of the Rightly Guided Khalifas. So could Ali chosen a kafir as a son-in-law for himself? And could Ali have given the oath of allegiance (bai'ah), as he did, to a kafir? Subhān Allah (Glory to God)! This indeed is a great accusation!
Shia curses Hasan son of Ali (May Allah be pleased with them)
Also, by cursing Mu'aawiya (May Allah be pleased with him), these Rafida (Shia) are actually cursing Hasan (May Allah be pleased with him). Because Hasan withdrew from, and gave up the Khilaafah to Mu'aawiya purely for the pleasure of Allah. The Messenger http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif foretold of this in the hadith. So can the grandson of The Messenger http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif actually have withdrawn from and left the Khilaafah in the hands of a Kafir for him to rule over the people? Subhān Allah! This indeed is a great accusation and insult!
If the Rafida say that Ali and Hasan were forced into doing this, then this is proof enough that these Rafida have no sense whatsoever. The accusations levelled against these two honored companions of the Prophet http://www.islamicweb.com/images/saws.gif are the worst insults ever imaginable and are beyond belief. They should remember that Ali faced the unbelievers in Mecca pace to face although Muslims were less than 40 man. So, why does he hide his Islam when Muslims became the majority and why he does not face the hypocrites?
Shia curses Aisha, the mother of the Believers (May Allah be pleased with her)
Furthermore, how do these Rafida curse and insult Umm ul Mu'mineen (mother of the Believers) A'isha when Allah Himself has mentioned her in the Qur'an as the mother of the believers?
"The Prophet is closer to the Believers than their own selves, and his wives are their (believers) mothers (as regards respect and marriage)." (Al-Ahzaab, verse 6)There is no doubt whatsoever that only that person will curse and insult Umm al-Mu'mineen who does not consider her to be a mother. Because for one who does have a mother, does not curse and insult her, but loves her.
Allah promised to give a great punishment to those who slander her:
"When you were propagating it (the slander) with your tongues, and uttering with your mouths that whereof you had no knowledge, you counted it a little thing, while with Allah it was very great." (An-Nur 24:15)Imam Malik stated that anyone who slanders her should be killed right away because Allah forbids us (in the Qur'an) from it forever and because anyone who curses the Prophet (p) or any member of this family should be killed too. This fatwa was also issued by his teacher Imam Ja'far al-Saadiq. Allah says:
"Allah forbids you from it (slandering 'A'isha) and warns you not to repeat the like of it forever, if you are believers." (An-Nur 24:17)Ali vs. Jesus
Indeed, Christians and Shia are very similar as a way of thinking. For instance, Christians take their priests as gods other than Allah. Shia also take their Imams as gods other than Allah.
Christians take Jesus as a son of Allah then they describe his death on the cross as he is a week man who cant do anything to support his faith. They made him a target to every kind of accusations, mocks, and humiliations. Shia on the other side give Ali a higher position than the prophet Muhammad (p) and claim that Islam wouldnt spread and unbelieving wouldnt be defeated without Ali. However, the claim that he too weak to defense Islam after the death of the prophet Muhammad (p) and he had to accept all kinds of accusations and humiliations against himself and against Ahlu-Bayt with no attempt to stop that.
Shia vs. Ahlu-Bayt
All members of Ahl-ul-Bayt (the family of the Holy Prophet) belong to Sunni Muslims. Imam Jafar al-Sadiq for instance, is the teacher of Imam Malik and Imam Abu-Hanifa. None of Ahlu-Bayt subscribed to the false beliefs of these Rafida (Shia). There are numerous solid arguments based on logic and Shari'ah refuting their religion and false beliefs. These arguments are so many that it would be difficult to recount them all. Therefore they should repent from their false and unfounded beliefs and enter into the fold of Islam."They are the enemies, so beware of them. May Allah curse them! How are they denying (or deviating from) the Right Path." (al-Munaafiqoon, verse 4)These Rafida (Shia) actually descend from Abu Lu'luah Majoosi (a Persian fire worshipper) and Abdullaah ibn Saba' (a Jew). However they are more dangerous from the Christians themselves. Christians fight Islam face to face (if they did) while Rafida stab Islam from its back.
http://www.islamicweb.com/beliefs/cults/shia.htm
Sunnis vs. Shiites
Introductionhttp://www.islamicweb.com/images/cbar.gif
Attributing kufr to a person, shouting, and blustering are the weapon of the weak. This page is not dedicated to the weaks but for facts and evidences that deserve a pause from you to contemplate through the page and know its goals. We have facts that may be published for the first time, and we have pictures, documents, audios and videos that prove our point. This page is for Sunnis who want to learn about Shi'ism and for those intelligent, open-minded Shia who are seeking the truth away from prejudice.
We are asking Muslims to unite and we are seeking unity. But unity should be based on the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His messenger, NOT at the expense of Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His messenger. Therefore, we adopted this Dialogue as a method to solve the discord and a course to elucidate the truth.
Bookmark this page: http://shia.islamicweb.com
Articles About Shi'ism
Additional references are available in Arabic
http://www.islamicweb.com/images/cbar.gif
- Iran -- The anti-Islamic Regime
- For Sunnis:
- A Quiet Dialogue with Shia:
http://www.islamicweb.com/images/cbar.gif
This book is highly recommended!- A Response to “Peshawar Nights”. Introduction Chapter One
- Shi’ah Concept of Temporary Marriage (Mut’ah) by Dr. Ahmad 'Abdullah Salamah.
- Extremist Shiites : The Ghulat Sects http://www.islamicweb.com/images/leavesite.gif
Recommended web sites
Last edited by cyber_abdullah; 16-11-09 at 09:22 PM.
a man of taste, apparently
lol
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
