i know alot of deobandi's brother's and alot of barelvi's brother's and talking to each, there is not much difference between them, both are following hanafi madhab, both are sufi, they are just fighting over the past and some thing's here and there they both dont agree on.
1. Both accept the four Imams in fiqh - Imam Abu Haneefah, Imam Malik, Imam Shafi'ee, Imam Ahmad
2. Both are hanafi in their fiqh
3. Both accept the four chains of tasawwuf - Naqshabandiyyah, Qadiriyyah, Soharwardiyyah and Chishtiyya.
so why all the fighting and pointing finger's at each other.








