Hafsah
07-08-05, 11:40 AM
This article is part of a two-part series considering the families affected by the war on terror living in the UK. In this first part, the problems facing these families are discussed.
Most of the casualties of war in this world are women and children(1); the casualties of the war on terror are no exception. In Britain alone, there are thousands of victims of this apparent war. The media, which has created the heroes and villains of the war as well as spreading their paranoid message of imminent doom and gloom in the form of an inevitable terror attack, have conveniently written them out of its version of a story which is essentially their own.
Excluded from the powerful gaze of the media machine in its zeal to present a partial view of history in the making, the families of the foreign detainees held in HMPs Belmarsh and Woodhill under the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act (ATCSA) of 2001, of Muslims arrested and later released without charge as terror suspects and the families of detainees held in foreign jails and concentration camps, such as Camp X-Ray, are persona non grata who have fallen through the net of media interest and are left stranded at sea to fend for themselves.
It’s not just the media, however, who is to blame for the exclusion and isolation of these families: all too often they are also excluded by their communities and former friends. They may even find that family members close their doors on their faces. As Umm Aisha, Babar Ahmad’s sister told www.cageprisoners.com, in an interview, ‘Some people, a small minority of people, have stopped ringing us or requested we remove their telephone numbers from our diaries and mobile phones’. Old friends, family members and acquaintances suddenly become afraid of keeping in touch with such families for fear of being tainted by the stigma of terrorism.
These families also face other, more serious problems; problems that they are often left, in their isolation from the wider community, to face alone. As in most families, these men are often the main, if not only, breadwinners, leaving the family in financial hardship after their arrest. In the case of individuals arrested as terror suspects who are later released without charge, sometimes in high-profile media cases, they may lose their jobs as a result and find it harder to find a new job, given this stain on their record. Some families have even lost their homes.
Having to cope with financial problems, as we are probably all aware, often aggravates other serious problems. The physical absence of a spouse or a father means that the wives and children of detainees have lost an important emotional and psychological support in their lives. For some of the detainees, their wives and children have no other family in this country and there is no other family member for them to turn to for support. In the case of some British families, it is the family itself that refuses to support the family.
The shock of seeing their husband arrested or learning of their arrest and having their home searched by the police can be highly stressful and humiliating for the families involved. Many detainees’ family members have suffered psychological problems.
The wife of one of the Belmarsh detainees, who was initially arrested in 2001, has suffered serious mental and psychological trauma since the police violently raided their home at the time of the initial arrest (she was pregnant at the time). This was followed by a campaign of intimidation by the British authorities leading to a nervous breakdown. Her son was subsequently taken away from her.(2)
Many of the wives’ and children of detainees have faced some form of psychological problem and their isolation from the wider community does not really help them. Commenting on the situation of Moazzam Begg’s family, Yvonne Ridley stated to www.cageprisoners.com, ‘Moazzam has never seen his fourth child, born after his kidnap. His wife goes about her days without complaint but I know she could do with the help and support of the community. We, as Muslims, should have been there for the Begg family from Day One. Shame, shame on us for looking the other way’.
It is the little things in life that affect us the most; some of the detainees’ wives have had to learn to look after their family’s finances or to support their family financially. Some detainees’ wives do not speak English and have had to learn to cope with a system that does not have much patience for people who are not able to communicate their wishes precisely and quickly enough.
Access to their loved ones can also be a battle. Many of the wives and children of the Belmarsh and Woodhill detainees seldom see their husbands and fathers, perhaps twice a month if they are lucky. Access, through letters via the International Red Cross, is even more precarious for the families of former and current Guantanamo detainees.
All of this is fairly stressful, especially when you have to cope with most of it on your own. How do you then explain it to your children? How do you explain to a child who has not seen their father for three years why he cannot come home when neither he nor you are exactly sure of the answer? How does a mother, a grandparent, an uncle or an aunt deal with the trauma of a child who has been bullied in the playground because their father is a “terrorist”?
The wife of one of the detainees has difficulties trying to make her young children understand why their father cannot come home and although it has been three years since he was detained, they still often cry for him at night.
Some of the detainees’ wives were pregnant at the time of their arrest; their children do not recognise or know their own fathers. The children too suffer psychological and personal traumas; some fear that their fathers will never be released. The young son of Guantanamo detainee, Jamil Al-Banna, wrote letters to Tony Blair and Prince Charles last year asking them to help secure the release of his father. Tony Blair did not reply and Prince Charles’ secretary replied that the prince was in a position to intercede.(3)
Indeed, this is an overwhelming amount of stress for any one person to bear, particularly when so much of it is borne alone. The Islamic faith puts an emphasis on brotherhood and solidarity between adherents of the faith. The Koran states, in Chapter 49 (The Inner Apartments) verse 10, ‘The Believers are but a single Brotherhood’, and a saying of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) states, ‘The example of the believers in their mutual love and mercy is like the example of a body; if one part of the body feels pain, then all the body suffers in sleeplessness and fever’.(4)
Yet, in spite of these principles, the response of the Muslim community has not been forthcoming, to say the least. The brother of former Guantanamo detainee Shafiq Rasul, Habib Rasul told www.cageprisoners.com in an interview about the response of the local Muslim community in Tipton, ‘I've been really disappointed with the response. They could have done a lot more. The community has been hiding really, mainly because they were afraid. Last week, when there were many reporters in Tipton, the local leaders have now started to jump on the band wagon, saying they were really happy that the detainees were coming home; I ask them, "Where were you hiding two years ago?" A lot of hypocrites have started to reveal themselves’.
In an article in the Guardian newspaper, commenting on Sabah Al-Banna’s situation, Victoria Brittain states, ‘she has found deeply hurtful the loss of some Muslim former friends who, perhaps fearing the taint of "terrorism", have abandoned her. "Can you imagine these people even blocked my telephone calls? But my God sent me other friends, and very kind people to help me, like Gareth Peirce [her solicitor]."(5)
Many people are afraid to get involved for the very reason mentioned above and also because they accept the official line that these people actually pose a threat. The fact is there is no danger in contacting either the detainees or their families.
These men are all prisoners of conscience. In spite of their lengthy detention, in some cases far longer than the detention of more dangerous criminals, none have been charged with any crime. None of the British detainees in Guantanamo have been charged with any crime whatsoever or the detainees under ATCSA; ample proof of this is found in the release of detainee C from Woodhill on 31 January 2005 – he neither knows why he was detained or released and no explanations have been offered!
The futures of the remaining detainees is highly precarious; while human rights activists and other concerned individuals worry about the implications and the course anti-terror legislation in Britain is running, imagine how much more stressful it is for the families of the detainees, whose hopes are constantly raised and dashed by the government’s futile attempts to balance what is lawful and what pleases their international partners in crime.
Mudassar Arani, a solicitor for some of the detainees, sums up the situation as follows, ‘I wish people could see the human side: the wives being thrown out of their homes, one woman miscarrying from the shock of her husband's arrest, the effect it has on the children’.(6)
Can you see it yet? Can you see who the actual victims of terror are now? You can just walk away and pretend to yourself that you have not just read what you have read and that that some of this may be happening a stone’s throw away from where you live. It’s your choice. You can pretend it doesn’t affect you, this is someone else’s problem but the fact of the matter is that it affects us all. As Umm Aisha said, ‘Some of the [Muslim] community are afraid to come up, and feel if they speak out, they will be hit next. Unfortunately the way things are going, if we don’t speak out we are more likely to be hit next, and by then it would be too late as we never spoke out for the people before’.(7)
(1)www.amnesty.org/ailib/intcam/women/women.htm
(2)read the full details of this story: Mustafa's Story
(3)The Ones Left Behind, Victoria Brittain, Guardian, Saturday 19 February 2005, Manchester
(4)Related by Bukhari and Muslim
(5)The Ones Left Behind, Victoria Brittain, Guardian, Saturday 19 February 2005, Manchester
(6)from www.cageprisoners.com
(7)In an interview with www.cageprisoners.com
SOURCE: Stop Political Terror
Most of the casualties of war in this world are women and children(1); the casualties of the war on terror are no exception. In Britain alone, there are thousands of victims of this apparent war. The media, which has created the heroes and villains of the war as well as spreading their paranoid message of imminent doom and gloom in the form of an inevitable terror attack, have conveniently written them out of its version of a story which is essentially their own.
Excluded from the powerful gaze of the media machine in its zeal to present a partial view of history in the making, the families of the foreign detainees held in HMPs Belmarsh and Woodhill under the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act (ATCSA) of 2001, of Muslims arrested and later released without charge as terror suspects and the families of detainees held in foreign jails and concentration camps, such as Camp X-Ray, are persona non grata who have fallen through the net of media interest and are left stranded at sea to fend for themselves.
It’s not just the media, however, who is to blame for the exclusion and isolation of these families: all too often they are also excluded by their communities and former friends. They may even find that family members close their doors on their faces. As Umm Aisha, Babar Ahmad’s sister told www.cageprisoners.com, in an interview, ‘Some people, a small minority of people, have stopped ringing us or requested we remove their telephone numbers from our diaries and mobile phones’. Old friends, family members and acquaintances suddenly become afraid of keeping in touch with such families for fear of being tainted by the stigma of terrorism.
These families also face other, more serious problems; problems that they are often left, in their isolation from the wider community, to face alone. As in most families, these men are often the main, if not only, breadwinners, leaving the family in financial hardship after their arrest. In the case of individuals arrested as terror suspects who are later released without charge, sometimes in high-profile media cases, they may lose their jobs as a result and find it harder to find a new job, given this stain on their record. Some families have even lost their homes.
Having to cope with financial problems, as we are probably all aware, often aggravates other serious problems. The physical absence of a spouse or a father means that the wives and children of detainees have lost an important emotional and psychological support in their lives. For some of the detainees, their wives and children have no other family in this country and there is no other family member for them to turn to for support. In the case of some British families, it is the family itself that refuses to support the family.
The shock of seeing their husband arrested or learning of their arrest and having their home searched by the police can be highly stressful and humiliating for the families involved. Many detainees’ family members have suffered psychological problems.
The wife of one of the Belmarsh detainees, who was initially arrested in 2001, has suffered serious mental and psychological trauma since the police violently raided their home at the time of the initial arrest (she was pregnant at the time). This was followed by a campaign of intimidation by the British authorities leading to a nervous breakdown. Her son was subsequently taken away from her.(2)
Many of the wives’ and children of detainees have faced some form of psychological problem and their isolation from the wider community does not really help them. Commenting on the situation of Moazzam Begg’s family, Yvonne Ridley stated to www.cageprisoners.com, ‘Moazzam has never seen his fourth child, born after his kidnap. His wife goes about her days without complaint but I know she could do with the help and support of the community. We, as Muslims, should have been there for the Begg family from Day One. Shame, shame on us for looking the other way’.
It is the little things in life that affect us the most; some of the detainees’ wives have had to learn to look after their family’s finances or to support their family financially. Some detainees’ wives do not speak English and have had to learn to cope with a system that does not have much patience for people who are not able to communicate their wishes precisely and quickly enough.
Access to their loved ones can also be a battle. Many of the wives and children of the Belmarsh and Woodhill detainees seldom see their husbands and fathers, perhaps twice a month if they are lucky. Access, through letters via the International Red Cross, is even more precarious for the families of former and current Guantanamo detainees.
All of this is fairly stressful, especially when you have to cope with most of it on your own. How do you then explain it to your children? How do you explain to a child who has not seen their father for three years why he cannot come home when neither he nor you are exactly sure of the answer? How does a mother, a grandparent, an uncle or an aunt deal with the trauma of a child who has been bullied in the playground because their father is a “terrorist”?
The wife of one of the detainees has difficulties trying to make her young children understand why their father cannot come home and although it has been three years since he was detained, they still often cry for him at night.
Some of the detainees’ wives were pregnant at the time of their arrest; their children do not recognise or know their own fathers. The children too suffer psychological and personal traumas; some fear that their fathers will never be released. The young son of Guantanamo detainee, Jamil Al-Banna, wrote letters to Tony Blair and Prince Charles last year asking them to help secure the release of his father. Tony Blair did not reply and Prince Charles’ secretary replied that the prince was in a position to intercede.(3)
Indeed, this is an overwhelming amount of stress for any one person to bear, particularly when so much of it is borne alone. The Islamic faith puts an emphasis on brotherhood and solidarity between adherents of the faith. The Koran states, in Chapter 49 (The Inner Apartments) verse 10, ‘The Believers are but a single Brotherhood’, and a saying of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) states, ‘The example of the believers in their mutual love and mercy is like the example of a body; if one part of the body feels pain, then all the body suffers in sleeplessness and fever’.(4)
Yet, in spite of these principles, the response of the Muslim community has not been forthcoming, to say the least. The brother of former Guantanamo detainee Shafiq Rasul, Habib Rasul told www.cageprisoners.com in an interview about the response of the local Muslim community in Tipton, ‘I've been really disappointed with the response. They could have done a lot more. The community has been hiding really, mainly because they were afraid. Last week, when there were many reporters in Tipton, the local leaders have now started to jump on the band wagon, saying they were really happy that the detainees were coming home; I ask them, "Where were you hiding two years ago?" A lot of hypocrites have started to reveal themselves’.
In an article in the Guardian newspaper, commenting on Sabah Al-Banna’s situation, Victoria Brittain states, ‘she has found deeply hurtful the loss of some Muslim former friends who, perhaps fearing the taint of "terrorism", have abandoned her. "Can you imagine these people even blocked my telephone calls? But my God sent me other friends, and very kind people to help me, like Gareth Peirce [her solicitor]."(5)
Many people are afraid to get involved for the very reason mentioned above and also because they accept the official line that these people actually pose a threat. The fact is there is no danger in contacting either the detainees or their families.
These men are all prisoners of conscience. In spite of their lengthy detention, in some cases far longer than the detention of more dangerous criminals, none have been charged with any crime. None of the British detainees in Guantanamo have been charged with any crime whatsoever or the detainees under ATCSA; ample proof of this is found in the release of detainee C from Woodhill on 31 January 2005 – he neither knows why he was detained or released and no explanations have been offered!
The futures of the remaining detainees is highly precarious; while human rights activists and other concerned individuals worry about the implications and the course anti-terror legislation in Britain is running, imagine how much more stressful it is for the families of the detainees, whose hopes are constantly raised and dashed by the government’s futile attempts to balance what is lawful and what pleases their international partners in crime.
Mudassar Arani, a solicitor for some of the detainees, sums up the situation as follows, ‘I wish people could see the human side: the wives being thrown out of their homes, one woman miscarrying from the shock of her husband's arrest, the effect it has on the children’.(6)
Can you see it yet? Can you see who the actual victims of terror are now? You can just walk away and pretend to yourself that you have not just read what you have read and that that some of this may be happening a stone’s throw away from where you live. It’s your choice. You can pretend it doesn’t affect you, this is someone else’s problem but the fact of the matter is that it affects us all. As Umm Aisha said, ‘Some of the [Muslim] community are afraid to come up, and feel if they speak out, they will be hit next. Unfortunately the way things are going, if we don’t speak out we are more likely to be hit next, and by then it would be too late as we never spoke out for the people before’.(7)
(1)www.amnesty.org/ailib/intcam/women/women.htm
(2)read the full details of this story: Mustafa's Story
(3)The Ones Left Behind, Victoria Brittain, Guardian, Saturday 19 February 2005, Manchester
(4)Related by Bukhari and Muslim
(5)The Ones Left Behind, Victoria Brittain, Guardian, Saturday 19 February 2005, Manchester
(6)from www.cageprisoners.com
(7)In an interview with www.cageprisoners.com
SOURCE: Stop Political Terror