AbuMubarak
13-07-05, 01:40 AM
Assalam O Alaikum, Sisters and Brothers
[CAIR is going to distribute “Women Friendly Mosques” brochure, a publication that its authors claim will “EDUCATE’ US Muslim leaders (means Imams, Ulemas, Sheikhs, and board members of Islamic Centers and Masajid). Women In Islam is one of the co-authors of the brochure along with the Islamic Social Services Associations (ISSA). These two organizations became the “Shaare” interpreter of fiqh of Salah of Women. The brochure (http://www.cair-net.org/pdf/intro.pdf and http://www.cair-net.org/pdf/text.pdf) claims to have got the expertise of following scholars;
Dr. Umar Abd’Allah, Shaykh Abdullah Adhami, Dr. Ingrid Mattasson, Dr. Amina McCloud, Dr. Loouay Safi, Dr. Jamal Badawi, Imam Zaid Shakir, and Dr. Omar Afzal.
The brochure claims to have the tacit support and endorsement of Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), Muslim Association of Canada, Muslim Alliance In North America, along with CAIR of US and Canada.
Surprisingly, Muslims Weekly contacted ICNA leadership and ICNA sister’s leadership, and both were completely unaware about the brochure -- there approval being out of question.
Scholars of Islam blame these organizations for having become apologetic and defensive after Amina Wadud and Asra Nomani’ s dirty plays.
Did Muslim organizations and scholars fell into the trap? Or there names were used without their permission or out of context? Or Muslim Organizations are crossing their jurisdiction and boundaries and their areas of activism?
We invite all the Islamic organizations, Scholars and Ulema whose names are either mentioned or not mentioned to respond on this sensitive issue (which many Muslims believe is a non-issue and is being raised by special interests to grind their axe) . We may publish all or some responses in the Muslims Weekly’s coming issues.
Khalid Beig, a California based senior Islamic writer, and author of the book “First Thing First” examined the brochure in accordance with Qur’an and Hadith. Following is his submission.]
Women and the Masjid: Dissecting the "Women Friendly Mosque"
By Khalid Baig
CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations) has announced that it will distribute a "Women Friendly Mosques" brochure, prepared by Shahina Siddiqui, Women In Islam and Islamic Social Services Association, Inc.(ISSA) and supported by Islamic Society of North America(ISNA), Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), Muslim Association of Canada (MAC), CAIR (Canada), and Muslim Alliance in North America (MANA). The brochure asserts the need for going back to the roots of Islam, offers a critique of our current practices regarding masajid in the USA, and offers a path of action to solve the problems it identifies in the first part. Unfortunately the analysis is faulty, the reference to Islamic teachings is deeply flawed, the conclusions drawn are wrong, and the prescription offered is dangerous.
Simply stated, the brochure promotes the idea of a coed masjid.
It is no surprise that the brochure has drawn applause from a certain quarter. Muqtedar Khan wrote: "This document, because of CAIR's legitimacy with mosque centered Muslims in North America, is a more powerful weapon for progressive Muslims than any argument that they themselves can advance." Interestingly there is acknowledgement here that the "progressive Muslims" are not centered in the mosque; they are only interested in destroying it.
In their zeal the writers of this brochure forgot what the masjid is all about. The word masjid means the place of sijda or prostration. It is the place for the group salat. Now, everybody knows that women are permitted to enter the masjid and offer their salat there but are not required or encouraged to do so. By exempting women from the obligation to offer salat in congregation and in the masjid, Islam clearly indicated that the roles and responsibilities of men and women are not the same regarding the masjid.
However, women may have genuine needs for using the masjid. They may be away from home at the time of salat. They may need the masjid facilities for their education. There may be other cases. That is why the permission granted to women for attending the Masjid is important. At the same time the masjid has to be the place where men and women can engage in worship, education, and remembrance of Allah without any distractions, whatsoever. Hence the requirement for segregation and other conditions regarding the attendance of women.
While the advocates of the coed masjid claim that they are asserting the rights of women, they are in fact denying the right of a private space to both men and women. That is not an easy task. It is made even more difficult by their need to sound authentic. Consequently it has led to a distortion of Qur'an and hadith texts.
Here is a part of one of the quotes from the Qur'an included in the brochure: "They (collaborate) to promote all that is good and oppose all that is evil." [Al-Tawbah 9:71]
The word "collaborate" has been inserted to suggest that the Qur'an is praising men and women collaborating with each other in a coed campaign. If that is the idea, that is a blatant lie. For the word is not there and it is not implied. The Qur'an is simply asking men and women to command good and forbid evil in their own spheres. Here, for comparison, are three translations:
YUSUFALI: they enjoin what is just, and forbid what is evil.
PICKTHAL: they enjoin the right and forbid the wrong.
SHAKIR: they enjoin good and forbid evil.
To understand the Qur'an's view of mixed gatherings, we can turn to this verse: "O you who believe! Let not some men among you laugh at others: It may be that the (latter) are better than the (former): Nor let some women laugh at others: It may be that the (latter) are better than the (former)" [Al-Hujarat, 49:11]. Here men have been admonished against laughing at other men and women from laughing at other women. But there is no mention of cross gender possibilities. Why? Because in Islam there is no concept of a mixed gathering. So the question of men laughing at women or vice versa simply does not arise.
The brochure's treatment of hadith is worse. For example, read this: "Women were active in public life and regularly attended the prayer at the masjid at all times, including Fajr and 'Isha, during the time of Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him." This clearly is a statement by the writers. However a footnote at the end of this statement claims otherwise. It states: "This hadith is also agreed upon." Hadith? Is there any hadith that begins with the words; "Women were active in public life?" Of course, there is no such hadith, yet it has been presented as such. We wish that those promoting this brochure would feel their grave responsibility in falsely presenting something as the words of the Prophet, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam.
Certainly there are authentic reports that tell us that women did attend the prayers at the masjid. But as we shall see below they do not support the overall picture being painted by the brochure.
This campaign also introduces a new term: "Women Friendly Mosque". The construct has serious problems. The term certainly does not come from the world of Islamic discourse. A masjid is a masjid --- a revered place because it is the House of Allah. In Islamic history no masjid has ever been described as anything friendly or anything unfriendly. That would amount to labeling this as a good masjid, that as a bad masjid. No Muslim can even think of denigrating a House of Allah with such labeling.
The only masjid condemned in the Qur'an was the Masjid Dirar, built by the hypocrites, for the express purpose of plotting conspiracies against Islam. It was burnt down. The Qur'an compared it to the Quba Masjid in these words: "There is a masjid whose foundation was laid from the first day on piety; it is more worthy of the standing forth (for prayer) therein. In it are men who love to be purified; and Allah loves those who make themselves pure." [At-Tauba 9:108]. It should be noted that the praiseworthy quality is the presence of men who loved to be purified. Women are not even mentioned.
The Women Friendly Mosque, as defined by the CAIR brochure, has never existed in Islamic history. Among their recommendations is that at least two women should be on the board of governors of every masjid, and that women should participate equally in all aspects of running the masjid, including their weekly programs, etc, etc. The brochure claims that it is trying to go back to the roots of Islam. But which Masjid in early Islamic period (or any period after that) met these conditions?
This is Madison Avenue, not Islam. And one wonders what is next. A User Friendly Shariah?
This strange concept has been built using other equally interesting arguments in the brochure. Here is a look at them.
1. Mutuality
It says "both [women and men] have been given the guidance to inspire goodness in each other . . . The respect, compassion, and mutuality that Allah has placed between women and men must be visible in not only our family life, but also in how Muslims conduct public transactions." It does not define "mutuality," but it is apparent that it is inferring a basis for a coed masjid and/or Islamic institutions from the Qur'an.
The verse quoted is from Surat Al-Ahzab: "For the Muslim men and women,- for the believing men and women, for the devout men and women, for the truthful men and women, for the men and women who are patient and constant, for the men and women who humble themselves, for the men and women who give charity, for the men and women who fast, for the men and women who guard their chastity, and for the men and women who are exceedingly mindful of Allah—for them has Allah prepared forgiveness and great rewards." [Al-Ahzab 33: 35]
What this very important verse tells us is that women and men are equal in being servants of Allah and being responsible for whatever obligations have been placed on them. Allah's forgiveness and great rewards are open to both men and women as they become sincere believers and devout worshipers, and as they develop qualities of humbleness, chastity, charity, and taqwa. It does not say that their obligations are the same.
It is well known that women have been exempted from the obligations of participating in Jihad on the battlefield, earning a living, or offering salat in the masjid, even for Jumuah. Their roles and responsibilities differ based on their biological and psychological makeup and their unique capabilities in managing the household. Placing them alongside men in the public arena causes two-fold problems. Problems caused by their absence from the home and problems caused by their presence in the public square. Islam takes strong measures to avoid both.
Historically, other civilizations have gone to one or the other extreme on this issue. They either denied them their equal humanity and spirituality, as was the case in the pre-modern Europe and the rest of the non-Islamic world. Or they offered this equality by negating their femininity, as is the case in the West today.
Islam shows us the middle path that avoids both extremes. It alone offers solutions to problems plaguing the world today. As Muslims it is our responsibility to communicate this solution to the world around us not only through words but, more important, through actions. We need to develop institutions that will show the blessings of Islamic teachings, not mold these institutions so they become indistinguishable from the corrupt surroundings.
2. Public Discussion
The brochure argues that both men and women must participate together in public discussions of issues concerning Muslims. And since the masjid is the place for such discussions, it follows that they must participate equally and without barriers inside the masjid. It claims that this was the pattern at the time of the Prophet, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, and quotes an incident involving Sayyidna Umar ibn Al-Khattab regarding a cap on dowry.
The reality is somewhat different. Regarding women's prayers in the masjid, we get this account:
Aishah, Radi-Allahu anha, narrates that the Prophet, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, used to pray Fajr at dusk and then the women would leave immediately without being recognized because of darkness and they would not recognize each other.
Another narration tells us:
Um Salamah, Radi-Allahu anha, reports that when the Prophet, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, finished the prayer by saying salam, the women would stand up and leave while he was saying the salam. And he would stay in his place for a little while before standing up. [Bukhari, Kitab-ul-Azan Bab Salat-un-Nisa khalf-ar-Rijal]. Other narrations tell us that men also stayed with the Prophet, Salla-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, so the women could leave before men.
While both of these ahadith tell us that women were praying in the masjid, they also inform us that an overriding concern was that they should not be seen by men. The women left even as the Prophet, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, was saying the salam. This act would be extremely rude if conducted by a man. Yet it was desirable for women, precisely because men and women are not the same. Further, all men stayed behind so the women could leave without encountering them. Needless to say, this is poles-apart from the mutual discussion, full participation, and collaboration being advocated by the brochure.
Regarding the incident involving Sayyidna Umar ibn al-Khattab, the brochure states "When the second caliph Umar bin al-Khatab wanted to put a cap on dowry, he was challenged by a woman who stood in the middle of the masjid and pointed out that his proposed policy violated Islamic law. He conceded and the proposed policy was never carried out."
Now here is the account from Kanzul Ummal.
Sha'bi narrates that Umar ibn al-Khattab gave a khutbah. He thanked and praised Allah and then said: "Beware! Do not go beyond limits in giving dowry to women. And if it reaches me that a person gave or is given more than what the Prophet, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, had given, I will put the excess in the Bait-ul-Maal." Then he stepped down. A woman from Quraish came and said: "O Amir al-Mu'mineen! Is the Book of Allah more deserving to be followed or your statement?" He said, "The Book of Allah. What is the matter?" She said: "Earlier you forbade the people from overpaying the dowry, but Allah says in His Book: '…and [even if] you have given one of them a heap of gold, then take not from it anything…'" Umar said: "Everyone is more knowledgeable than Umar! (twice or thrice)." Then he returned to the mimbar and said to the people: "I had forbidden you from overpaying the dowry. Let a person do with his wealth whatever appears proper to him." !
There are many narrations of this incident, but this one is more detailed. It depicts a setting very unlike the one being painted in the brochure. It was not a mixed gathering, where men and women were sitting next to each other and were freely exchanging ideas, as the brochure has us believe. It was most probably an old woman, covered completely in hijab so no part of her body or clothing except the external cover would show, and she came to the Khalifah after he stepped down from the mimbar. We can surmise these from other well-known facts. It is well known that Sayyidna Umar, Radi-Allahu unhu, was extremely sensitive about hijab and he wished for the laws of hijab before they were actually revealed. We also know that he had such awe that women used to be extra careful regarding their hijab in front of him. It is ironic, actually tragic, that an incident regarding him should be invoked in trying to defeat the same laws of hijab.
There is something else worth reflecting upon here. Islam brought about a sea-change in the Jahilya society, including its ethics, morality, and cultural practices. The pre-Islamic Jahilya society was a coed society, just like the modern Jahilya society. Islam transformed it, introducing, among other things, the laws of hijab and segregation of men and women. Of course the masjid was the center of this cultural and moral revolution. It had to depict the new teachings in the purest way possible so they would be emulated everywhere. And it did. Women were fully covered, wore no perfume or jingling jewelry, stayed as far away from men as possible and left the masjid quickly after the salat so there would be no intermixing. Even on the way to and from the masjid, they would stay so far to the sides that they were practically scraping the walls of the buildings. (See Abu Dawud, Kitab-ul-Adab. Bab "Fi Mashyin nisaa-i ma'ar-rijaali fit-tareeq")
[b]3. Blocking the Means
The brochure also takes issue with the well-established Islamic juristic principle of Sadd-udh-dharaai', or the principle of blocking the means to sin, and tries to dismiss it summarily. This assertion shows ignorance of both the Islamic principle and the wisdom behind it. In life often one thing leads to another. An act of sin is not an isolated event but is preceded by chains of other events, which facilitate it. Therefore, Islam does not just forbid the final act, but also the preceding acts that can lead to it. There are hundreds of laws in Islamic jurisprudence that are based on this important principle. Consider alcohol. All its problems arise from its consumption. But Islam banned not just consumption of alcohol, but also making it, storing it, selling it, offering it, and even eating at a table where it is being served. This is blocking the means. One only needs to look at the spectacular success that Islam had in prohibiting alcohol an! d keeping the lands of Islam dry compared to the miserable failure of other societies in achieving that goal to appreciate the wisdom of the Islamic teachings.
Islam's laws of hijab follow the same principle. Ultimately, it is the illicit extramarital relationships that are prohibited. But Islam does not limit itself to this final result. It also prohibits a number of other practices that could lead to this final sin. Again, the result speaks for itself. For centuries, Islam has provided an atmosphere of chastity and decency in its societies that remains unmatched by any other society. And this has been accomplished through the same laws of hijab and segregation of sexes that are under attack today.
4. Honoring the Contributions of Men and Women in the Masjid
The brochure announces, "Now is the time for community leaders to seize the opportunity to create vibrant mosques and Islamic centers that honor the contributions of both women and men." One wonders whether the authors forgot why they had entered the masjid in the first place by the time they reached this paragraph. The masjid is a place for glorifying Allah and remembering Him, not ourselves. It is the House of Allah. A believer goes there to submit to Him and not to his own ego.
5. Islamic Teachings
The brochure repeatedly presents full participation in the masjid by women as a God-given right. Therefore it is important to review Islamic teachings regarding the presence of women in the masjid. Three facts stand out:
1) Islam did not require the women to offer their salat in the masjid, or even in congregation anywhere.
2) Islam did not encourage women to go to the masjid.
3) Islam did permit them to offer their salat in the masjid with certain conditions.
Given below are some of the ahadith that clearly substantiate this.
A) Um Salama, Radi-Allahu anha, narrates that the Messenger of Allah, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, said: "The best masjid for women is the innermost part of their houses." [Ahmad 6/297, Tabrani in Al-Kabeer, Ibn Khuzaima, Mustadrak Hakim 1/209].
B) Um Humayd, the wife of Abu Humayd As-Sa'di, Radi-Allahu anhuma, narrates that she came to the Prophet, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam and said: "O Messenger of Allah, I love to pray with you. He said,
I know that you love to pray with me, but your prayer in your bayt [e.g. bedroom] is better than your prayer in your hujra [e.g. living room], and your prayer in your hujra is better than your prayer in your daar [e.g. courtyard], and your prayer in your daar is better than your prayer in your neighborhood masjid, and your prayer in your neighborhood masjid is better than your prayer in my masjid.
The narrator says: "So she ordered and a masjid was constructed for her in the farthest and darkest corner of her house, and she continued to pray there until she died." [Ahmad 6/371, Ibn Khuzaima 3/95, Ibn Hibban 2214]
C) Abdullah ibn Mas'ud, Radi-Allahu anhu, narrates that the Messenger of Allah, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, said: "No woman prays a prayer more beloved to Allah, than that in the darkest part of her home." [At-Tabrani in Al-Kabeer. Also Ibn Khuzaimah 3/96]
D) Abdullah Ibn Umar, Radi-Allahu anhu, narrates that the Messenger of Allah, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, said: "The woman is worth hiding ('awrat) and when she leaves her home, the Shaytaan raises his glance to her, and she is never closer to Allah than when she is in the innermost part of her home." [Tabrani in Al-Awsat. For similar ahadith see Tirmidhi, Abwaab-ur-Ridaa' 1173; Ibn Khuzaima 3/93; Ibn Hibban 5570]
E) Abdullah Ibn Umar, Radi-Allahu anhu, narrates that the Messenger of Allah, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, said: "Do not prevent your women from (entering) the mosques, but their houses are better for them." [Abu Dawud Kitab-us-Salat. Bab Ma Jaa'a fi Khuroojin-nisaa-i ilal Masjid]
F) Abdullah Ibn Umar, Radi-Allahu anhu, narrates that the Messenger of Allah, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, said: "Do not prevent your women from (entering) the mosques of Allah." [Sahih Muslim. Kitab-us-Salat, Babu Khuroojin Nisaai ilal masjid iza lam utarattab. #668]
This last hadith has been used as a justification for an unmitigated and unconditional right of women to fully participate in the main hall of a masjid. But this is not how it has been understood by hadith scholars and Muslim jurists. In his commentary of Sahih Muslim, Imam Nawawi writes:
From this hadith and other ahadith like this it appears that women should not be prohibited from the masjid, but with conditions that the scholars have mentioned and which are deduced from ahadith and these are:
1) She should not wear any perfume.
2) She should not be adorned (with makeup, etc)
3) She should not be wearing jingling jewelry
4) She should not be wearing fancy clothes.
5) She should not mix with the men.
6) She should not be young, through whom fitna can erupt
7) The path to the masjid should be safe (i.e. there should be no fear of any problem on her way to and from the masjid).
Stopping them from going to the masjid will be lightly discouraged (makruh tanzihi) if she meets all the conditions listed here and has a husband or guardian. Stopping them will be haram when she meets all the conditions and does not have a husband or guardian."
We can gain further insight into this issue by looking at the positions of the schools of fiqh.
Shafi'i Fiqh
Taken from the Reliance of the Traveler:
It is better for women to pray at home than at the mosque (A: whether they are young or old). It is offensive for an attractive or young woman to come to the mosque to pray (O: or for her husband to permit her), though not offensive for women who are not young or attractive when this is unlikely to cause temptation. (N: the authors words here must be interpreted in the light of the following details: If a woman in going to a group prayer or elsewhere will definitely lead to temptation between the sexes, it is unlawful for her to go. If such temptation can be definitely prevented her going to attend group prayer remains sunnah, as is attested to by the ahadith that have reached us on the subject. If temptation is feared but not certain to occur, her going becomes offensive. Whether such temptation is likely to occur is something that differs with different times, places, and people. An old woman is not like a young one, nor a righteous society l! ike one in which temptation between the sexes is the rule; nor is a special prayer place set aside for women in a mosque like a prayer place which they share with men. This is why A'isha (Allah be well pleased with her) said:
"Had the Prophet, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, seen what women do now, he would have forbidden them the mosque as the women of Bani-Israel were forbidden." (A hadith reported by Bukhari and Muslim)
Hanafi Fiqh
Translated from Al-Lubaab:
And it is offensive for young women to attend the congregation at all, because in that there is a fear of fitna (but there is no harm that old women attend Fajr, Maghrib, and Isha). And that is according to Imam Abu Hanifah. And according to them (Imam Abu Yusuf and Imam Muhammad) old women can go out in every salah, because there is no fear of fitna because they lack attractiveness. According to Jawharatun Nayyara, the offensiveness is in all salah because of the appearance of fisq in our time period. The bad people come more during Zuhr, Asr, and Jumuah prayers while they are sleeping at the time of Fajr and Isha and eating at the time of Maghrib.
The positions of the Maliki and Hambali schools are also similar.
Conclusion
As has been shown above, the case for a full and equal participation by men and women without barriers in the main hall of the masjid, therefore, has no foundation in the Shariah.
However, women may have genuine needs for using the masjid and they have been permitted to do so. It is the responsibility of the administrators of a masjid to see to it that these needs are met by providing them with a safe, protected, and private space. Where women are denied entry in the masjid, or where they are required to enter the main hall, the situation should be corrected.
The central argument of the proponents of the coed masjid is that segregation is exclusion. But it is not. No one would take the demand seriously that medical and engineering students at a university must share the same classroom to prove that they are not unequal. Their needs are different, and so are their spaces.
The prohibition of free mixing of men and women and their equal, unrestrained participation in public affairs is not something to be ashamed of. This has been meant to provide for chastity and purity of hearts and conduct and that has been its result. In contrast, houses of worship of other religions became horrible centers of corruption on this account precisely because their leaders chose to ignore this principle.
CAIR and ICNA (Islamic Circle of North America) have received the support of the community because of their good works. But their leaders should remember that no one gets a blank check. When they are providing service to Islam they will get the support of the Muslim community. When they start engaging in disservice, as they have with the careless promotion of this brochure, they will cease to deserve that support.
The Masjid is the pivot for the Muslim community. It has to be the place that sets the standards for proper behavior. It is the responsibility of everyone to protect it from all corruption, including the one promoted in the name of reform.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jawed Anwar
Editor in Chief
Muslims Weekly
Website: www.muslimsweekly.com
[CAIR is going to distribute “Women Friendly Mosques” brochure, a publication that its authors claim will “EDUCATE’ US Muslim leaders (means Imams, Ulemas, Sheikhs, and board members of Islamic Centers and Masajid). Women In Islam is one of the co-authors of the brochure along with the Islamic Social Services Associations (ISSA). These two organizations became the “Shaare” interpreter of fiqh of Salah of Women. The brochure (http://www.cair-net.org/pdf/intro.pdf and http://www.cair-net.org/pdf/text.pdf) claims to have got the expertise of following scholars;
Dr. Umar Abd’Allah, Shaykh Abdullah Adhami, Dr. Ingrid Mattasson, Dr. Amina McCloud, Dr. Loouay Safi, Dr. Jamal Badawi, Imam Zaid Shakir, and Dr. Omar Afzal.
The brochure claims to have the tacit support and endorsement of Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), Muslim Association of Canada, Muslim Alliance In North America, along with CAIR of US and Canada.
Surprisingly, Muslims Weekly contacted ICNA leadership and ICNA sister’s leadership, and both were completely unaware about the brochure -- there approval being out of question.
Scholars of Islam blame these organizations for having become apologetic and defensive after Amina Wadud and Asra Nomani’ s dirty plays.
Did Muslim organizations and scholars fell into the trap? Or there names were used without their permission or out of context? Or Muslim Organizations are crossing their jurisdiction and boundaries and their areas of activism?
We invite all the Islamic organizations, Scholars and Ulema whose names are either mentioned or not mentioned to respond on this sensitive issue (which many Muslims believe is a non-issue and is being raised by special interests to grind their axe) . We may publish all or some responses in the Muslims Weekly’s coming issues.
Khalid Beig, a California based senior Islamic writer, and author of the book “First Thing First” examined the brochure in accordance with Qur’an and Hadith. Following is his submission.]
Women and the Masjid: Dissecting the "Women Friendly Mosque"
By Khalid Baig
CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations) has announced that it will distribute a "Women Friendly Mosques" brochure, prepared by Shahina Siddiqui, Women In Islam and Islamic Social Services Association, Inc.(ISSA) and supported by Islamic Society of North America(ISNA), Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), Muslim Association of Canada (MAC), CAIR (Canada), and Muslim Alliance in North America (MANA). The brochure asserts the need for going back to the roots of Islam, offers a critique of our current practices regarding masajid in the USA, and offers a path of action to solve the problems it identifies in the first part. Unfortunately the analysis is faulty, the reference to Islamic teachings is deeply flawed, the conclusions drawn are wrong, and the prescription offered is dangerous.
Simply stated, the brochure promotes the idea of a coed masjid.
It is no surprise that the brochure has drawn applause from a certain quarter. Muqtedar Khan wrote: "This document, because of CAIR's legitimacy with mosque centered Muslims in North America, is a more powerful weapon for progressive Muslims than any argument that they themselves can advance." Interestingly there is acknowledgement here that the "progressive Muslims" are not centered in the mosque; they are only interested in destroying it.
In their zeal the writers of this brochure forgot what the masjid is all about. The word masjid means the place of sijda or prostration. It is the place for the group salat. Now, everybody knows that women are permitted to enter the masjid and offer their salat there but are not required or encouraged to do so. By exempting women from the obligation to offer salat in congregation and in the masjid, Islam clearly indicated that the roles and responsibilities of men and women are not the same regarding the masjid.
However, women may have genuine needs for using the masjid. They may be away from home at the time of salat. They may need the masjid facilities for their education. There may be other cases. That is why the permission granted to women for attending the Masjid is important. At the same time the masjid has to be the place where men and women can engage in worship, education, and remembrance of Allah without any distractions, whatsoever. Hence the requirement for segregation and other conditions regarding the attendance of women.
While the advocates of the coed masjid claim that they are asserting the rights of women, they are in fact denying the right of a private space to both men and women. That is not an easy task. It is made even more difficult by their need to sound authentic. Consequently it has led to a distortion of Qur'an and hadith texts.
Here is a part of one of the quotes from the Qur'an included in the brochure: "They (collaborate) to promote all that is good and oppose all that is evil." [Al-Tawbah 9:71]
The word "collaborate" has been inserted to suggest that the Qur'an is praising men and women collaborating with each other in a coed campaign. If that is the idea, that is a blatant lie. For the word is not there and it is not implied. The Qur'an is simply asking men and women to command good and forbid evil in their own spheres. Here, for comparison, are three translations:
YUSUFALI: they enjoin what is just, and forbid what is evil.
PICKTHAL: they enjoin the right and forbid the wrong.
SHAKIR: they enjoin good and forbid evil.
To understand the Qur'an's view of mixed gatherings, we can turn to this verse: "O you who believe! Let not some men among you laugh at others: It may be that the (latter) are better than the (former): Nor let some women laugh at others: It may be that the (latter) are better than the (former)" [Al-Hujarat, 49:11]. Here men have been admonished against laughing at other men and women from laughing at other women. But there is no mention of cross gender possibilities. Why? Because in Islam there is no concept of a mixed gathering. So the question of men laughing at women or vice versa simply does not arise.
The brochure's treatment of hadith is worse. For example, read this: "Women were active in public life and regularly attended the prayer at the masjid at all times, including Fajr and 'Isha, during the time of Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him." This clearly is a statement by the writers. However a footnote at the end of this statement claims otherwise. It states: "This hadith is also agreed upon." Hadith? Is there any hadith that begins with the words; "Women were active in public life?" Of course, there is no such hadith, yet it has been presented as such. We wish that those promoting this brochure would feel their grave responsibility in falsely presenting something as the words of the Prophet, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam.
Certainly there are authentic reports that tell us that women did attend the prayers at the masjid. But as we shall see below they do not support the overall picture being painted by the brochure.
This campaign also introduces a new term: "Women Friendly Mosque". The construct has serious problems. The term certainly does not come from the world of Islamic discourse. A masjid is a masjid --- a revered place because it is the House of Allah. In Islamic history no masjid has ever been described as anything friendly or anything unfriendly. That would amount to labeling this as a good masjid, that as a bad masjid. No Muslim can even think of denigrating a House of Allah with such labeling.
The only masjid condemned in the Qur'an was the Masjid Dirar, built by the hypocrites, for the express purpose of plotting conspiracies against Islam. It was burnt down. The Qur'an compared it to the Quba Masjid in these words: "There is a masjid whose foundation was laid from the first day on piety; it is more worthy of the standing forth (for prayer) therein. In it are men who love to be purified; and Allah loves those who make themselves pure." [At-Tauba 9:108]. It should be noted that the praiseworthy quality is the presence of men who loved to be purified. Women are not even mentioned.
The Women Friendly Mosque, as defined by the CAIR brochure, has never existed in Islamic history. Among their recommendations is that at least two women should be on the board of governors of every masjid, and that women should participate equally in all aspects of running the masjid, including their weekly programs, etc, etc. The brochure claims that it is trying to go back to the roots of Islam. But which Masjid in early Islamic period (or any period after that) met these conditions?
This is Madison Avenue, not Islam. And one wonders what is next. A User Friendly Shariah?
This strange concept has been built using other equally interesting arguments in the brochure. Here is a look at them.
1. Mutuality
It says "both [women and men] have been given the guidance to inspire goodness in each other . . . The respect, compassion, and mutuality that Allah has placed between women and men must be visible in not only our family life, but also in how Muslims conduct public transactions." It does not define "mutuality," but it is apparent that it is inferring a basis for a coed masjid and/or Islamic institutions from the Qur'an.
The verse quoted is from Surat Al-Ahzab: "For the Muslim men and women,- for the believing men and women, for the devout men and women, for the truthful men and women, for the men and women who are patient and constant, for the men and women who humble themselves, for the men and women who give charity, for the men and women who fast, for the men and women who guard their chastity, and for the men and women who are exceedingly mindful of Allah—for them has Allah prepared forgiveness and great rewards." [Al-Ahzab 33: 35]
What this very important verse tells us is that women and men are equal in being servants of Allah and being responsible for whatever obligations have been placed on them. Allah's forgiveness and great rewards are open to both men and women as they become sincere believers and devout worshipers, and as they develop qualities of humbleness, chastity, charity, and taqwa. It does not say that their obligations are the same.
It is well known that women have been exempted from the obligations of participating in Jihad on the battlefield, earning a living, or offering salat in the masjid, even for Jumuah. Their roles and responsibilities differ based on their biological and psychological makeup and their unique capabilities in managing the household. Placing them alongside men in the public arena causes two-fold problems. Problems caused by their absence from the home and problems caused by their presence in the public square. Islam takes strong measures to avoid both.
Historically, other civilizations have gone to one or the other extreme on this issue. They either denied them their equal humanity and spirituality, as was the case in the pre-modern Europe and the rest of the non-Islamic world. Or they offered this equality by negating their femininity, as is the case in the West today.
Islam shows us the middle path that avoids both extremes. It alone offers solutions to problems plaguing the world today. As Muslims it is our responsibility to communicate this solution to the world around us not only through words but, more important, through actions. We need to develop institutions that will show the blessings of Islamic teachings, not mold these institutions so they become indistinguishable from the corrupt surroundings.
2. Public Discussion
The brochure argues that both men and women must participate together in public discussions of issues concerning Muslims. And since the masjid is the place for such discussions, it follows that they must participate equally and without barriers inside the masjid. It claims that this was the pattern at the time of the Prophet, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, and quotes an incident involving Sayyidna Umar ibn Al-Khattab regarding a cap on dowry.
The reality is somewhat different. Regarding women's prayers in the masjid, we get this account:
Aishah, Radi-Allahu anha, narrates that the Prophet, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, used to pray Fajr at dusk and then the women would leave immediately without being recognized because of darkness and they would not recognize each other.
Another narration tells us:
Um Salamah, Radi-Allahu anha, reports that when the Prophet, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, finished the prayer by saying salam, the women would stand up and leave while he was saying the salam. And he would stay in his place for a little while before standing up. [Bukhari, Kitab-ul-Azan Bab Salat-un-Nisa khalf-ar-Rijal]. Other narrations tell us that men also stayed with the Prophet, Salla-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, so the women could leave before men.
While both of these ahadith tell us that women were praying in the masjid, they also inform us that an overriding concern was that they should not be seen by men. The women left even as the Prophet, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, was saying the salam. This act would be extremely rude if conducted by a man. Yet it was desirable for women, precisely because men and women are not the same. Further, all men stayed behind so the women could leave without encountering them. Needless to say, this is poles-apart from the mutual discussion, full participation, and collaboration being advocated by the brochure.
Regarding the incident involving Sayyidna Umar ibn al-Khattab, the brochure states "When the second caliph Umar bin al-Khatab wanted to put a cap on dowry, he was challenged by a woman who stood in the middle of the masjid and pointed out that his proposed policy violated Islamic law. He conceded and the proposed policy was never carried out."
Now here is the account from Kanzul Ummal.
Sha'bi narrates that Umar ibn al-Khattab gave a khutbah. He thanked and praised Allah and then said: "Beware! Do not go beyond limits in giving dowry to women. And if it reaches me that a person gave or is given more than what the Prophet, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, had given, I will put the excess in the Bait-ul-Maal." Then he stepped down. A woman from Quraish came and said: "O Amir al-Mu'mineen! Is the Book of Allah more deserving to be followed or your statement?" He said, "The Book of Allah. What is the matter?" She said: "Earlier you forbade the people from overpaying the dowry, but Allah says in His Book: '…and [even if] you have given one of them a heap of gold, then take not from it anything…'" Umar said: "Everyone is more knowledgeable than Umar! (twice or thrice)." Then he returned to the mimbar and said to the people: "I had forbidden you from overpaying the dowry. Let a person do with his wealth whatever appears proper to him." !
There are many narrations of this incident, but this one is more detailed. It depicts a setting very unlike the one being painted in the brochure. It was not a mixed gathering, where men and women were sitting next to each other and were freely exchanging ideas, as the brochure has us believe. It was most probably an old woman, covered completely in hijab so no part of her body or clothing except the external cover would show, and she came to the Khalifah after he stepped down from the mimbar. We can surmise these from other well-known facts. It is well known that Sayyidna Umar, Radi-Allahu unhu, was extremely sensitive about hijab and he wished for the laws of hijab before they were actually revealed. We also know that he had such awe that women used to be extra careful regarding their hijab in front of him. It is ironic, actually tragic, that an incident regarding him should be invoked in trying to defeat the same laws of hijab.
There is something else worth reflecting upon here. Islam brought about a sea-change in the Jahilya society, including its ethics, morality, and cultural practices. The pre-Islamic Jahilya society was a coed society, just like the modern Jahilya society. Islam transformed it, introducing, among other things, the laws of hijab and segregation of men and women. Of course the masjid was the center of this cultural and moral revolution. It had to depict the new teachings in the purest way possible so they would be emulated everywhere. And it did. Women were fully covered, wore no perfume or jingling jewelry, stayed as far away from men as possible and left the masjid quickly after the salat so there would be no intermixing. Even on the way to and from the masjid, they would stay so far to the sides that they were practically scraping the walls of the buildings. (See Abu Dawud, Kitab-ul-Adab. Bab "Fi Mashyin nisaa-i ma'ar-rijaali fit-tareeq")
[b]3. Blocking the Means
The brochure also takes issue with the well-established Islamic juristic principle of Sadd-udh-dharaai', or the principle of blocking the means to sin, and tries to dismiss it summarily. This assertion shows ignorance of both the Islamic principle and the wisdom behind it. In life often one thing leads to another. An act of sin is not an isolated event but is preceded by chains of other events, which facilitate it. Therefore, Islam does not just forbid the final act, but also the preceding acts that can lead to it. There are hundreds of laws in Islamic jurisprudence that are based on this important principle. Consider alcohol. All its problems arise from its consumption. But Islam banned not just consumption of alcohol, but also making it, storing it, selling it, offering it, and even eating at a table where it is being served. This is blocking the means. One only needs to look at the spectacular success that Islam had in prohibiting alcohol an! d keeping the lands of Islam dry compared to the miserable failure of other societies in achieving that goal to appreciate the wisdom of the Islamic teachings.
Islam's laws of hijab follow the same principle. Ultimately, it is the illicit extramarital relationships that are prohibited. But Islam does not limit itself to this final result. It also prohibits a number of other practices that could lead to this final sin. Again, the result speaks for itself. For centuries, Islam has provided an atmosphere of chastity and decency in its societies that remains unmatched by any other society. And this has been accomplished through the same laws of hijab and segregation of sexes that are under attack today.
4. Honoring the Contributions of Men and Women in the Masjid
The brochure announces, "Now is the time for community leaders to seize the opportunity to create vibrant mosques and Islamic centers that honor the contributions of both women and men." One wonders whether the authors forgot why they had entered the masjid in the first place by the time they reached this paragraph. The masjid is a place for glorifying Allah and remembering Him, not ourselves. It is the House of Allah. A believer goes there to submit to Him and not to his own ego.
5. Islamic Teachings
The brochure repeatedly presents full participation in the masjid by women as a God-given right. Therefore it is important to review Islamic teachings regarding the presence of women in the masjid. Three facts stand out:
1) Islam did not require the women to offer their salat in the masjid, or even in congregation anywhere.
2) Islam did not encourage women to go to the masjid.
3) Islam did permit them to offer their salat in the masjid with certain conditions.
Given below are some of the ahadith that clearly substantiate this.
A) Um Salama, Radi-Allahu anha, narrates that the Messenger of Allah, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, said: "The best masjid for women is the innermost part of their houses." [Ahmad 6/297, Tabrani in Al-Kabeer, Ibn Khuzaima, Mustadrak Hakim 1/209].
B) Um Humayd, the wife of Abu Humayd As-Sa'di, Radi-Allahu anhuma, narrates that she came to the Prophet, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam and said: "O Messenger of Allah, I love to pray with you. He said,
I know that you love to pray with me, but your prayer in your bayt [e.g. bedroom] is better than your prayer in your hujra [e.g. living room], and your prayer in your hujra is better than your prayer in your daar [e.g. courtyard], and your prayer in your daar is better than your prayer in your neighborhood masjid, and your prayer in your neighborhood masjid is better than your prayer in my masjid.
The narrator says: "So she ordered and a masjid was constructed for her in the farthest and darkest corner of her house, and she continued to pray there until she died." [Ahmad 6/371, Ibn Khuzaima 3/95, Ibn Hibban 2214]
C) Abdullah ibn Mas'ud, Radi-Allahu anhu, narrates that the Messenger of Allah, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, said: "No woman prays a prayer more beloved to Allah, than that in the darkest part of her home." [At-Tabrani in Al-Kabeer. Also Ibn Khuzaimah 3/96]
D) Abdullah Ibn Umar, Radi-Allahu anhu, narrates that the Messenger of Allah, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, said: "The woman is worth hiding ('awrat) and when she leaves her home, the Shaytaan raises his glance to her, and she is never closer to Allah than when she is in the innermost part of her home." [Tabrani in Al-Awsat. For similar ahadith see Tirmidhi, Abwaab-ur-Ridaa' 1173; Ibn Khuzaima 3/93; Ibn Hibban 5570]
E) Abdullah Ibn Umar, Radi-Allahu anhu, narrates that the Messenger of Allah, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, said: "Do not prevent your women from (entering) the mosques, but their houses are better for them." [Abu Dawud Kitab-us-Salat. Bab Ma Jaa'a fi Khuroojin-nisaa-i ilal Masjid]
F) Abdullah Ibn Umar, Radi-Allahu anhu, narrates that the Messenger of Allah, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, said: "Do not prevent your women from (entering) the mosques of Allah." [Sahih Muslim. Kitab-us-Salat, Babu Khuroojin Nisaai ilal masjid iza lam utarattab. #668]
This last hadith has been used as a justification for an unmitigated and unconditional right of women to fully participate in the main hall of a masjid. But this is not how it has been understood by hadith scholars and Muslim jurists. In his commentary of Sahih Muslim, Imam Nawawi writes:
From this hadith and other ahadith like this it appears that women should not be prohibited from the masjid, but with conditions that the scholars have mentioned and which are deduced from ahadith and these are:
1) She should not wear any perfume.
2) She should not be adorned (with makeup, etc)
3) She should not be wearing jingling jewelry
4) She should not be wearing fancy clothes.
5) She should not mix with the men.
6) She should not be young, through whom fitna can erupt
7) The path to the masjid should be safe (i.e. there should be no fear of any problem on her way to and from the masjid).
Stopping them from going to the masjid will be lightly discouraged (makruh tanzihi) if she meets all the conditions listed here and has a husband or guardian. Stopping them will be haram when she meets all the conditions and does not have a husband or guardian."
We can gain further insight into this issue by looking at the positions of the schools of fiqh.
Shafi'i Fiqh
Taken from the Reliance of the Traveler:
It is better for women to pray at home than at the mosque (A: whether they are young or old). It is offensive for an attractive or young woman to come to the mosque to pray (O: or for her husband to permit her), though not offensive for women who are not young or attractive when this is unlikely to cause temptation. (N: the authors words here must be interpreted in the light of the following details: If a woman in going to a group prayer or elsewhere will definitely lead to temptation between the sexes, it is unlawful for her to go. If such temptation can be definitely prevented her going to attend group prayer remains sunnah, as is attested to by the ahadith that have reached us on the subject. If temptation is feared but not certain to occur, her going becomes offensive. Whether such temptation is likely to occur is something that differs with different times, places, and people. An old woman is not like a young one, nor a righteous society l! ike one in which temptation between the sexes is the rule; nor is a special prayer place set aside for women in a mosque like a prayer place which they share with men. This is why A'isha (Allah be well pleased with her) said:
"Had the Prophet, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, seen what women do now, he would have forbidden them the mosque as the women of Bani-Israel were forbidden." (A hadith reported by Bukhari and Muslim)
Hanafi Fiqh
Translated from Al-Lubaab:
And it is offensive for young women to attend the congregation at all, because in that there is a fear of fitna (but there is no harm that old women attend Fajr, Maghrib, and Isha). And that is according to Imam Abu Hanifah. And according to them (Imam Abu Yusuf and Imam Muhammad) old women can go out in every salah, because there is no fear of fitna because they lack attractiveness. According to Jawharatun Nayyara, the offensiveness is in all salah because of the appearance of fisq in our time period. The bad people come more during Zuhr, Asr, and Jumuah prayers while they are sleeping at the time of Fajr and Isha and eating at the time of Maghrib.
The positions of the Maliki and Hambali schools are also similar.
Conclusion
As has been shown above, the case for a full and equal participation by men and women without barriers in the main hall of the masjid, therefore, has no foundation in the Shariah.
However, women may have genuine needs for using the masjid and they have been permitted to do so. It is the responsibility of the administrators of a masjid to see to it that these needs are met by providing them with a safe, protected, and private space. Where women are denied entry in the masjid, or where they are required to enter the main hall, the situation should be corrected.
The central argument of the proponents of the coed masjid is that segregation is exclusion. But it is not. No one would take the demand seriously that medical and engineering students at a university must share the same classroom to prove that they are not unequal. Their needs are different, and so are their spaces.
The prohibition of free mixing of men and women and their equal, unrestrained participation in public affairs is not something to be ashamed of. This has been meant to provide for chastity and purity of hearts and conduct and that has been its result. In contrast, houses of worship of other religions became horrible centers of corruption on this account precisely because their leaders chose to ignore this principle.
CAIR and ICNA (Islamic Circle of North America) have received the support of the community because of their good works. But their leaders should remember that no one gets a blank check. When they are providing service to Islam they will get the support of the Muslim community. When they start engaging in disservice, as they have with the careless promotion of this brochure, they will cease to deserve that support.
The Masjid is the pivot for the Muslim community. It has to be the place that sets the standards for proper behavior. It is the responsibility of everyone to protect it from all corruption, including the one promoted in the name of reform.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jawed Anwar
Editor in Chief
Muslims Weekly
Website: www.muslimsweekly.com