PDA

View Full Version : Ubuntu - A New Approach to Desktop Linux


abdulhakeem
09-07-05, 07:52 PM
By Greg Taylor (http://www.reviewlinux.com/authors/7/Greg-Taylor)
Published 06/20/2005

Ubuntu

Some Background Info
Ubuntu is funded largely by Canonical Ltd., a company headed by Mark Shuttleworth, the director of Ubuntu Linux. Mark is actively involved with the development of the distribution and frequents the community meetings, often speaking directly to the users and keeping involved with discussions. I am thrilled to see this level of commmunity interaction from the higher ups.

Ubuntu has a regular release every 6 months and supports each one for 18 months with security updates and bug fixes.

The Ubuntu Manifesto states that "Every computer user should have the freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, share, change and improve their software for any purpose, without paying licensing fees." As is such, Ubuntu has stated that they will never charge users for a "premium" or "enterprise" edition of their product. A more complete run-down on the underlying philosophy of Ubuntu is located at http://www.ubuntulinux.org/ubuntu/philosophy/document_view (http://www.ubuntulinux.org/ubuntu/philosophy/document_view).

Installation Media
Ubuntu Linux is available via a single-CD install for x86, AMD64, and PowerPC. A wide variety of mirrors exist to make the ISO hunting process much easier, and there is also an option to request a pressed Ubuntu CD in the mail via Ship-It (http://shipit.ubuntulinux.org/ (http://shipit.ubuntulinux.org/)).

Note that there are Live CDs for each of the architectures mentioned earlier, as well as combination Live/Install CDs.

The Installation Process
Booting from the installation CD, a simple splash screen and a prompt asking for boot/install options appears. Hitting <ENTER>and accepting the defaults worked fine for me on my Inspiron 5150 and my AMD system.

A curses installer based on Debian-Netinstall appears and asks you some questions about your language preferences and hardware, eventually leading to partitioning and choosing whether you want a Custom/Server install or Default Desktop install.


Server vs. Desktop
The server install for Ubuntu is best described as bare bones and minimal. This is great for servers that don't need a desktop environment, or customizing Ubuntu for a slower machine with a more lightweight desktop such as XFCE. The casual user will definitely want to stick with the defaults and go for the full-blown desktop. The Partitioner
The installer's partitioner is the only area that sticks out to me as being a real weakness. It is a bit kludgey for newer linux users to use if they don't want to go with the default partitioning scheme, and re-sizing doesn't always work as intended. In my opinion, it's extremely important to be able to re-size NTFS partitions easily and reliably within the installer since Linux converts usually arrive courtesy of Windows frustration. Although the partitioner generally works fine, I have had problems with it in the past, especially so with laptops.

Installing Packages
This is where things take a turn for the easy. After partitioning, the installation whirrs by and a basic desktop system installs itself without any further user input. The latest versions of the software included with Ubuntu are downloaded directly from mirrors and shortly after, you are able to reboot into your brand new desktop.

The actual installation time depends largely on your connection speed. I would estimate no more than 2 minutes worth of answering questions and selecting options if you've installed Linux at least once. In the case of a newcomer, expect to spend anywhere from 5 to 10 minutes, which is still small in comparison to many other distros.

The actual downloading/installing of the software is what currently takes the longest amount of time. Those with dial-up will find the process grueling, but broadband users will quickly zip through the process in around 15-30 minutes.

Awakening the Hedgehog
The Hoary boot process is still a bit crude and un-polished. A basic GRUB boot screen appears and asks you what kernel you want to use and will automatically select the default after a period of time. The init scripts run by and the lack of color or decoration often spooks some users, but re-assurance arrives when an Ubuntu themed GDM screen appears from the black nether of the boot process. The default login prompt is very sleek and attractive (and may be changed easily to the user's tastes) and if fingers could drool, they most certaintly would at the looks of this thing.

The Ubuntu Desktop
Ubuntu "Hoary" Linux features Gnome 2.10 and other very up-to-date versions of popular software commonly bundled with Linux distros. Firefox is the default web browser and Evolution comes out of the box. OpenOffice is ready to go, as are a number of other must-haves. The standard Ubuntu desktop is very much ready and raring right "out of the box."

Looking at the Ubuntu desktop theme, it is sleek and stylish much like the login prompt. Combinations of gold and brown adorn the wallpaper and everything looks very clean and put together.

Launching a few of the included programs reveals that Ubuntu is not only good looking, it is also quite fast. I connect my USB key drive and am immediately listening to music from it and browsing the web.

Everyday Maintenance on Ubuntu
Adding, removing, and upgrading software is extremely easy through Synaptic, a graphical front-end to Apt. This is perhaps one of Ubuntu's biggest selling points: Its roots in Debian. With the combined power of Synaptic and Apt, users are able to easily install, remove, and upgrade packages with simple mouse clicks. Absolutely no knowledge of the command line is needed for what can be a daunting task on other distros. Not only is package manipulation easy, users are notified by an icon in their system tray when new updates need to be applied.

Hardware Compatibility
In my experiences at Linux InstallFests, I've found Ubuntu to support a staggering variety of hardware with little to no work at all. Most of my dealings with Ubuntu have been on the laptop side, which is often the trickiest with Linux. Surprisingly, Ubuntu usually handles laptops without a problem.

Many cameras, external drives, mice, and other peripherals work just by plugging the devices in. The majority of the time, the devices need no configuration at all.

Wireless: A Big Hurdle for Linux Desktop
The tricky part has always been wireless support for Linux. Many hardware manufacturers refuse to release Linux drivers for their products despite complaints and requests from their customers. If you're lucky, your hardware is covered by one of the popular Linux Wifi drivers. If not, be prepared to venture into the murky land of ndiswrapper.

In the case that your wireless card is made by one of the brands lucky enough to have Linux drivers, you may find your card working the first time you boot up. If not, be prepared to spend some time finding your Windows drivers, copying them to your drive, and using them with ndiswrapper, a sort of Windows emulator for wireless drivers. Given you are able to find and install the correct driver, you will not notice a difference from other cards once it's working.

The Ubuntu Community
One thing that really struck me as a distro-hopper was the Ubuntu community. There are tons of resources for new and old Linux users to get help and learn what their system is capable of. A massive amount of how-to's and supportive people exists under the name o f Ubuntu. A few good examples are the Ubuntu Wiki (http://wiki.ubuntu.com (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/)), the Unofficial Ubuntu Starter Guide (http://ubuntuguide.org (http://ubuntuguide.org/)), and the Ubuntu Forums (http://ubuntuforums.org (http://ubuntuforums.org/)). Every one of these resources is full of useful information and are often concise and easy to understand.

Development is very open and almost anyone can get involved with helping the community grow and prosper. Everyone is made to feel welcome and the Ubuntu users are some of the friendliest I've ever seen as a whole.

Desktop Linux: Is it Still Too Early?
Despite a few rough edges, I think Ubuntu is probably the closest of any Desktop-oriented distro to achieving the long sought after level of usability that will bring Linux to the mainstream. Things work well with little hassle, if they don't you can find a lot of help within the community, and the Ubuntu desktop is attractive and fast.

Installation, while not overly attractive, is fast and simple and the setup process after that is equally easy. Synaptic makes augmenting your system with new applications easier than ever.

Ubuntu very rarely locks up or even stutters and has been very stable on the hardware I've tested it on. Those bothered by the frequent restarting of Windows will find refuge in the stable confines of Ubuntu Linux.

Summary
Keeping in mind that this is only Ubuntu's second official release, the quality of this distribution is absolutely outstanding. With a regular release cycle of 6 months, we will get to see if Ubuntu "Breezy" Linux holds up to the reputation for stability and ease of use that has been set early on.

As a result of being easy to use, well supported, and a very positive boost to the Linux desktop, I give Ubuntu a rating of 10 out of 10 and would recommend it to anyone (including SpyWare-infected Grandparents). Try this distribution out if you are skeptical about Linux desktops and you just may be very surprised at how far it has come.

A Note on Ratings
My ratings are given on a 1-10 scale which is relative to the "best" and "worse" Linux distribution currently in circulation. If a distro receives a 10, it is the best or one of the best, and if it receives a 1 it is the worse or one of the worse. A rating of 10, although rare, does not constitute perfection. It means that I think said distribution is top notch.

http://www.reviewlinux.com/articles/8/1/Ubuntu---A-New-Approach-to-Desktop-Linux

AbuMubarak
09-07-05, 07:58 PM
funny you should post that

today i got my first ubuntu dvd

also, i got xandross and gentoo

i havent decided yet, which to install, right now, i am still enjoying fedora core 3

thanks for the info, akhi

abdulhakeem
09-07-05, 08:04 PM
funny you should post that

today i got my first ubuntu dvd

also, i got xandross and gentoo

i havent decided yet, which to install, right now, i am still enjoying fedora core 3

thanks for the info, akhiactually i was thinking about you when i read the article ;)

AbuMubarak
09-07-05, 08:10 PM
بارك الله فيك يا أخي

AbuMubarak
08-08-05, 12:24 AM
just to update you akhi

i installed xandros, linspire, mandriva, and gentoo

none of them hold a candle to fedora

but i have ubuntu on the cd and could not find it in the install

it must be there somewhere, but if i ever install it, i will update you to my perception of it

.: Rashid :.
08-08-05, 12:31 AM
Yes, insha'Allah, I plan on installing Ubuntu.

Sounds great! :D Which is a shame...kind of. Usually those things which sound good turn out to be bad :(

*forces himself to think its gonna be bad* :p

I ordered CDs with ShipIp...'s gonna take ages to arrive :(

-Rashid

AbuMubarak
08-08-05, 12:46 AM
i cant knock any of the linux distrubutions (distros), becuase to me, all of them outdo windows, but i am pretty stuck on fedora

let me know how unbuntu works out, i may try searching thru this install cd to see how come i couldnt find it, i dont even know why they would put two distros on one cd, without an option of going to one or the other

i probably overlooked something and now, since i have my fedora up and running, i am not about to mess with things

.: Rashid :.
08-08-05, 01:00 AM
i cant knock any of the linux distrubutions (distros), becuase to me, all of them outdo windows, but i am pretty stuck on fedora

let me know how unbuntu works out, i may try searching thru this install cd to see how come i couldnt find it, i dont even know why they would put two distros on one cd, without an option of going to one or the other

i probably overlooked something and now, since i have my fedora up and running, i am not about to mess with things

Yeah, I was gonna get FC4 (cos of you're and bro abdusamad advice :D) but then I read Abdullah's post...(on MPADC) and it made FC sound rubbish :p

Insha'Allah I'll letcha know :up:

-Rashid

AbuMubarak
08-08-05, 01:09 AM
you tell brother abdullah that he is just playa hatin

fc outdoes ubuntu by a mile

.: Rashid :.
08-08-05, 01:47 AM
you tell brother abdullah that he is just playa hatin

fc outdoes ubuntu by a mile

lol. Why?

He did make several interesting points. For example, FC is just a test bed for RH, so if something's in FC, it means RH's testing it for some reason...:/

So you get a very buggy distro...

-Rashid

AbuMubarak
08-08-05, 01:58 AM
akhi

do you really think i have time for a "buggy distro"?

what fedora is is the testing ground for new, cutting edge linux, you are first online with the best and newest of linux

buggy? there are some issues with fedora, but no more than windows or any other linux distro, but there are some linux who love fedora, some who hate it, as it is with every other distro

but for me to be mr computer illiterate, it cant be too buggy, because i have weighed going back to windows, vs another distro and i always come back to fedora

and if i was to start listing all the stuff that comes with fedora that you have to pay for with the other distros or windows, you would be suprised

the only issue i truly have with all of linux is the webcam/mic feature, basically it sucks

other than that, from pdf to everything else, it outshines windows and other distros

my opinion, take it or leave it

.: Rashid :.
08-08-05, 02:01 AM
akhi

do you really think i have time for a "buggy distro"?

what fedora is is the testing ground for new, cutting edge linux, you are first online with the best and newest of linux

buggy? there are some issues with fedora, but no more than windows or any other linux distro, but there are some linux who love fedora, some who hate it, as it is with every other distro

but for me to be mr computer illiterate, it cant be too buggy, because i have weighed going back to windows, vs another distro and i always come back to fedora

and if i was to start listing all the stuff that comes with fedora that you have to pay for with the other distros or windows, you would be suprised

the only issue i truly have with all of linux is the webcam/mic feature, basically it sucks

other than that, from pdf to everything else, it outshines windows and other distros


Great, just when I was sure I was gonna get Ubuntu :rolleyes:

Do you download all 4 CDs to install? ATM, thats my primary obstacle...I have a few weeks until the Ubuntu CDs arrive, so I might as well try out FC, eh?

my opinion, take it or leave it

:freedom:

-Rashid :p

AbuMubarak
08-08-05, 02:03 AM
i know people that have had problems with the CD set, i did, i waited until the dvd came out

but try it, if you have any problems, email me, its my aim,msn,yahoo screenname at yahoo, hotmail or netscape.net (dont use aim though, i dont check that email)yahoo would be best

AbuMubarak
08-08-05, 02:04 AM
o

another thing

i would get rid of windows, so you wont have to worry about the boot loader, but thats your choice, many keep it, but i dont have time to switch between OS's

and if you have any problems, go to www.fedoraforum.org

.: Rashid :.
08-08-05, 02:06 AM
i know people that have had problems with the CD set, i did, i waited until the dvd came out

I don't have any blank DVDs. Heard they cost a bomb :confused:

but try it, if you have any problems, email me, its my aim,msn,yahoo screenname at yahoo, hotmail or netscape.net (dont use aim though, i dont check that email)yahoo would be best

Jazakallah.

i would get rid of windows, so you wont have to worry about the boot loader, but thats your choice, many keep it, but i dont have time to switch between OS's

I don't have Windows :D I don't have time to start up Linux let alone switch between it and another OS ;) I haven't turned off my computer (and left it off)* for weeks :D

* I had to reboot into Slax the other day, to recover some stuff from a USB pen...

-Rashid

AbuMubarak
08-08-05, 02:10 AM
if you are using slax, then you will find fedora a breeze

i wasnt saying burn it to a dvd, i got it free out of a magazine (i had to pay for the mag)

try the four cd's some people find it works

of course you can pm me here too

.: Rashid :.
08-08-05, 02:21 AM
if you are using slax, then you will find fedora a breeze

i wasnt saying burn it to a dvd, i got it free out of a magazine (i had to pay for the mag)

try the four cd's some people find it works

of course you can pm me here too

I will? Slax (LiveCD I was running) is the easiest to use distro I've ever used...is it meant to be hard? :p

Ah, right, getcha. Well, I dunno of any magazines that have FC4 with them. I don't buy magazines...there's maybe one good computer magazine surrounded by a hundred dirty ones :(

4 CDs takes too long to download, and I don't have 4 blanks CD-RWs :(

Jazakallah again :up:

-Rashid

AbuMubarak
10-08-05, 03:08 PM
and dont download iso files on a cdrw, use only a cdr

.: Rashid :.
10-08-05, 03:20 PM
and dont download iso files on a cdrw, use only a cdr

:| Why? I've ordered some CD-RWs now, just so I can burn the FC isos onto it...

-Rashid

AbuMubarak
10-08-05, 03:46 PM
you can use the cdrw's as a floppy

but you have to burn iso's to a cdr

i dont know why, it has something to do with the construction of the disk and how it is made and how it is read and stuff like that

thats what i was told, anyway, i did the same thing and the iso's didnt work on cdrw, only on cdr

.: Rashid :.
10-08-05, 03:57 PM
you can use the cdrw's as a floppy

but you have to burn iso's to a cdr

i dont know why, it has something to do with the construction of the disk and how it is made and how it is read and stuff like that

thats what i was told, anyway, i did the same thing and the iso's didnt work on cdrw, only on cdr

With FC specifically? I've burned several LiveCD ISOs onto CD-RW and they worked fine :shrug:

But then again, they were all LiveCDs, and none were RH based...is it anything to do with them being RH/FC?

-Rashid

AbuMubarak
10-08-05, 04:10 PM
too techie for me, akhi

ask baba or sajid

.: Rashid :.
10-08-05, 04:34 PM
too techie for me, akhi

ask baba or sajid

lol.

Jazak Allah kahyr :)

-Rashid

muslimglobe.com
11-08-05, 02:38 PM
my test list:


freebsd
openbsd
pcbsd
fedora
ubuntu

.: Rashid :.
11-08-05, 02:48 PM
my test list:


freebsd
openbsd
pcbsd
fedora
ubuntu

You mean that you have tried all of these, or intend to try all of these?

-Rashid

muslimglobe.com
12-08-05, 04:54 PM
I have not tried those yet, but inshaAllah will do, i here fedora core has some bugs but this was version 2, also the kde is modifed on it, and some problems with open office. I'm going to probably give that a miss, i have heard very good things about the openbsd os for servers. and actually beating red hat.

.: Rashid :.
12-08-05, 05:17 PM
I have not tried those yet, but inshaAllah will do, i here fedora core has some bugs but this was version 2, also the kde is modifed on it, and some problems with open office. I'm going to probably give that a miss, i have heard very good things about the openbsd os for servers. and actually beating red hat.

Yeah, I'm thinking of trying some BSDs out as well. They use portage, which sounds great. Anything else good about them, or should I stick with Linux?

-Rashid

abdusamad
12-08-05, 06:28 PM
The main reason for Abu Mubarak liking Fedora Core is probably because it is Very Very Very user-friendly. Ubuntu is a bit different, but it outruns Fedora Core with Apt-get. BUT people have been saying something about "apt-get on Fedora".


Like always depending on the reason for using linux, different distros suit different people. I myself like it for coding, designing purposes. So i would need a non-buggy and best suiting distro for my system. Gentoo does me well. Since when you install it installs just for your system. Configuration is done specific for you system needs.


OpenBSD is another OS which i would give thumps up!


Like i said, it all depends what you want to use it for.


FC and Mandrake is as easy it can get, in my opinion.