PDA

View Full Version : Urgent Action for Mahmoud Abu Rideh


Amatullah
05-05-05, 04:42 PM
This is an international effort and EVERYONE should take part. Mahmoud Abu Rideh is a Palestinian refugee who came to the UK in 1997 and was granted asylum after having been tortured by the Israelis. He was arrested under British terror legislation in 2001 and was one of the ten foreign detainees released under "control orders" in March 2005. He has breached his bail conditions by refusing to be electronically tagged when in public and handed himself over to the police. He is currently being detained at Brixton jail in London and is suicidal. The following link gives details of HOW you can help - by putting pressure on the UK government and authorities. If you're too lazy to use conventional mail, EMAIL the British government. Email and postal details are provided.
If you need help writing your letter, please let me know but PLEASE TAKE ACTION. Please forward this to family and friends too.




http://web.amnesty.org/library/print/ENGEUR450122005 (javascript:ol('http://web.amnesty.org/library/print/ENGEUR450122005');)
PUBLIC

AI Index: EUR 45/012/2005
04 May 2005

UA 108/05 Health concern

UNITED KINGDOM Mahmoud Abu Rideh (m), aged 34, Palestinian refugee

Amnesty International is concerned for the mental health of Palestinian refugee Mahmoud Abu Rideh, after the UK authorities refused to grant him bail in order that he receive appropriate treatment at a hospital in central London. He is at serious risk of taking his own life.

Mahmoud Abu Rideh, a torture victim who suffers from severe post-traumatic stress disorder, is charged with breaching a 'control order' under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (PTA). Under this legislation, he has been obliged, among other things, to wear an electronic tag since March 2005. In April, the UK authorities agreed to allow him to remove the electronic tag while he received treatment at a hospital in London for his deteriorating mental health. After two weeks of hospital treatment Mahmoud Abu Rideh's health had improved, but he apparently feared that he would not be able to cope with the replacement of the electronic tag. He voluntarily went to a police station in London and announced that he would refuse to have the tag put back on. Shortly afterwards, he was arrested and charged with breaching the conditions of his control order, and remanded into custody to Brixton Prison in south London, where he has since been held in the hospital wing.

Mahmoud Abu Rideh appeared in court to face the charge against him on 4 May. The court heard that doctors who have been treating him recommended he should be released on bail, on condition that he be subject to a curfew between 7pm and 7am, during which time he should reside at the hospital, and that he attend a programme of therapeutic activities at the hospital between 9am and 5pm every day. Mahmoud Abu Rideh’s lawyer pleaded that her client should not be sent back to prison as she feared that he may attempt to take his life. He has made at least four attempts on his life recently; the last one, a very serious attempt, on 29 April. However, the authorities have refused to grant bail to Mahmoud Abu Rideh, and he was ordered to remain in Brixton Prison pending a further hearing in two weeks' time.

Mahmoud Abu Rideh was granted refugee status in the UK in 1997. He was originally arrested in December 2001 under Part 4 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 (ATCSA) and held without charge or trial until March 2005. In June and July 2002, Amnesty International expressed concern that Mahmoud Abu Rideh’s detention conditions amounted to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, which were causing a marked deterioration in his mental and physical health, and that he was at serious risk of taking his own life (see UA 198/02, EUR 45/010/2002, 28 June 2002, and follow-ups). He was released when Part 4 of the ATCSA expired in March 2005, and immediately was made the subject of a control order under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Please send appeals to arrive as quickly as possible, in English or your own language:
-expressing concern for Mahmoud Abu Rideh, who is at risk of taking his own life if he continues to be held in custody at Brixton Prison;
- noting his history of mental health problems, including post-traumatic stress disorder;
- noting that at a hearing on 4 May, doctors treating him recommended that he be permitted to receive residential treatment at a hospital;
- urging the authorities to grant Mahmoud Abu Rideh’s lawyer’s request that he be given bail immediately in order that he receive appropriate medical treatment.


APPEALS TO:
Home Secretary
The Rt Hon Charles Clarke MP
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Home Office
50 Queen Anne's Gate
London SW1H 9AT, UK.
Fax: + 44 20 7035 4745
Email: public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk (http://by103fd.bay103.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/compose?curmbox=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001&a=d0f9944b606d2f419f2d2cd55a42fcb3&mailto=1&to=public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk&msg=3CA7A715-7006-4347-B5D3-4DADC720EE78&start=0&len=5981&src=&type=x)
Salutation: Dear Home Secretary

COPIES TO:
Prison Governor
John Podmore
Governor, Brixton HMP
Jebb Avenue
Brixton
London SW2 5XF, UK.
Fax: + 44 20 8588 6283
Salutation: Dear Governor

and to diplomatic representatives of United Kingdom accredited to your country.

PLEASE SEND APPEALS IMMEDIATELY. Check with the International Secretariat, or your section office, if sending appeals after 15 June 2005.********

In the unlikely case that Charles Clarke is not the Home Secretary tomorrow, I shall let you know who to address correspondence to.

yorkshireman
05-05-05, 07:59 PM
Please mark all correspondance clearly "Please put me on the extremist watch list" or "I'm already on the extremist watch list" in order to save the people who will process your communications time.

Thanks.

Stillcurious
05-05-05, 08:04 PM
Didn't read the first post fully, because it looked immensely biased.

Haz
06-05-05, 06:18 AM
Please mark all correspondance clearly "Please put me on the extremist watch list" or "I'm already on the extremist watch list" in order to save the people who will process your communications time.

Thanks.


Probably you should direct those lines to Michael Jackson or OJ Simpson. "Hey I'm a Peodophile, put me in Jail", or " Hey i'm a murderer give me death sentence"

Your obsession with "muslim extremists" seems to be fruitfull.

Amatullah
06-05-05, 02:19 PM
Please mark all correspondance clearly "Please put me on the extremist watch list" or "I'm already on the extremist watch list" in order to save the people who will process your communications time.

Thanks.

the issue here isnt who's a terrorist and who's not....but about a human rights (amnesty international is a HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANISATION..)

yorkshireman
07-05-05, 07:08 PM
the issue here isnt who's a terrorist and who's not....but about a human rights (amnesty international is a HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANISATION..)

Actually the issue here is precisely who's a terrorist and who isn't.

If you hang around with far left wackos long enought you'll be convinced that whether people have committed crimes is irrelevant if you try to make it part of some big picture whining about "human rights" but they are in fact wrong.

Did person X break law Y, yes or no. Yes? OK then they get sentance Z.

In the case of terrorists identified by ongoing infiltrations it's did person X involve themselves in terrorism according to multiple sources available to security cleared defence advocates. Yes? Then they get control order Z.

Thats it. Save the lefty whining for people who like that sort of thing, which will include no one who has any power.

Don't forget it could be worse, the French just kill them in the street and call it a road accident.

Sophiya
08-05-05, 09:51 PM
i never get what these petitions do, or marches- who do you actually think is going to listen to a bunch of people's demands becuase they walked 2km or they got 100,000 signitures. if that was the case then surely the further one walked or the more signitures one got the more concessions they could get. i mean you should get 1000000 signitures and walk 100km to see if u could free everyone from prison

Amatullah
13-05-05, 12:38 PM
i never get what these petitions do, or marches- who do you actually think is going to listen to a bunch of people's demands becuase they walked 2km or they got 100,000 signitures. if that was the case then surely the further one walked or the more signitures one got the more concessions they could get. i mean you should get 1000000 signitures and walk 100km to see if u could free everyone from prison

:D

http://www.ummah.com/forum/showthread.php?t=56353