PDA

View Full Version : Cannabis & Mental Illness


Ebony
05-12-04, 12:52 PM
Cannabis linked to mental illness risk

Sarah Boseley, health editor
Thursday December 2, 2004
The Guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk/)

Some young people who smoke cannabis are at real risk of developing psychotic mental illness, according to a major study announced yesterday.



The new survey of 2,500 young people aged 14 to 24 will be discussed at the start of an international conference today on cannabis and mental health convened by the Institute of Psychiatry in London.

It shows that regular cannabis smoking increased the risk of developing psychosis by 6% over four years.

But there was a substantially greater impact on young people who had already been identified by psychiatrists as having the potential to become psychotic. Regular cannabis smoking raised their risk of developing psychotic mental illness by 25%.

The study aimed to answer a question that has been unsettling psychiatrists for some time. People with psychosis, whose symptoms include hallucinations, paranoia, hearing voices and a persecution complex, are more likely than not to have a marijuana habit.

But doctors have not known whether they are smoking it for relief from their symptoms, or whether cannabis itself might be the problem.

Cannabis may be a harmless recreational drug for most of its users and has medicinal benefits for others, but the study will add fuel to the debate on its legalisation. One of the authors of the study, carried out by researchers from the Netherlands, said that although cannabis triggered psychosis in a minority of people, this was a good reason to legalise it, not ban it, so that government can promote advice and information, as it does on alcohol.



Jim van Os, a professor in the department of psychiatry and neuropsychology at Maastricht University in the Netherlands, where cannabis is legal, said a ban would be hard. "It is going to be very difficult to tell the whole Dutch population to stop using cannabis because it is bad and you will develop psychotic illness. But perhaps it is better to say if you have a family history or mental instability you are perhaps particularly at risk of negative consequences of cannabis use.

"The way to get the message across is for young people to talk about the issues and have more social control among themselves, rather than the big brother approach."

Zerrin Atakan, honorary senior lecturer at the national psychosis unit of the Institute of Psychiatry and a speaker at today's conference, said cannabis had medicinal uses and, like alcohol, was not a problem in moderation. She pointed to the different effect on the brain of the two compounds it contained - tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). Cannabis high in THC was stronger and potentially more dangerous, while CBD might be responsible for its beneficial effects.

"I personally believe it should be legalised so it is tightly regulated and it says on the packet how much THC is in it," she said. "At the moment it is worse because people think it is legalised and there is confusion and it is in the hands of the dealers. That is not a good situation."

The study, published in the online version of the British Medical Journal, followed 2,437 young people living in Munich, Germany.

All had a psychiatric assessment at the start of the study, to identify those who might be vulnerable to psychosis. Four years later, they were asked about their cannabis use and their mental health was assessed again. Regular users of cannabis who had been identified as vulnerable to psychosis were much more likely to become psychotic than those who were neither. Robin Murray, professor of psychiatry at the Institute of Psychiatry, London, said there were still many unanswered questions, such as: "If half the world smokes cannabis, why aren't they all psychotic?"</FONT>

http://society.guardian.co.uk/mentalhealth/story/0,8150,1364454,00.html

Realms
05-12-04, 01:15 PM
Cannabis use is a major problem iin the west at the moment. More and more youngsters are using it on a regular basis. The problem is that governments themselves control the drugs trade so they can get extra funding for secret projects which are hidden from the public and cannot be funded by public money. The drugs problem will never end in the west become of how lucrative the industry is.
Even if cannabis is legalized it still doesn't matter to them because they know many youngsters use it because of the thrill that is against the law. After it's legalization it won't stem the demand of hard drugs because more users will turn to them just to be rebels.

Stanley Stunodd
05-12-04, 02:39 PM
After it's legalization it won't stem the demand of hard drugs because more users will turn to them just to be rebels.
I would beg to differ with your assessment of the situation.
The usage of harder drugs stems from the results being sought by the individual.
Marijuana should not be held accountable for the actions of any person which seeks to experiment further with other compounds of nature.

I believe, If any government were to implement a USE TAX with regards to the growing, harvesting and usage of marijuana, trade in Marijuana would decrease significantly and the capital generated through the collection of this USE TAX could then be applied to law enforcement measures against trafficking and distribution of these other harmful and illegal drugs.
Alongside this effort, the country in question should also fully developed a HEMP production and manufacturing base for the benefit of the economy.
This would do two things, Hemp is a non-drug commodity, this would infuse capital and employment opportunities for people. Secondly, marijuana can not be grown successfully anywhere within 5 miles as the wind blows from a field of Hemp.
This would serve to generate a secondary market for those who purchase the USE TAX and cultivate their own marijuana since they would need to do this indoors, with filter systems to prevent pollination by any floating hemp pollen.
Lighting, special equipment, soils, fertilizers, etc. etc. , which would build up the economy.

If people were to purchase, lets say a tax stamp, allowing them to grow 5 pounds dry marijuana per year. And let's imagine this tax stamp costs each citizen $500 a year.
In the year 2002, there were counted, 109.3 million HOUSEHOLDS.
http://www.census.gov/statab/www/part1.html (http://www.census.gov/statab/www/part1.html)
Now let us use for example, the notion that 50 million of these households would acquire a TAX STAMP to grow marijuana.
50 Million x $500 a year = $ 25 Billion dollars to be used for other efforts.
Add in the capital generated by Hemp as a commodity and all the resources which would utilize it, PLUS the market for supplies in the indoor growing industry, and I believe any nation would prosper with very little side effects from the above described actions.

Of course, I always could be wrong :)

abdulhakeem
05-12-04, 03:04 PM
Cannabis "increases risk of psychosis" (http://www.ummah.com/forum/showthread.php?t=46746)

Tahiyah
05-12-04, 08:51 PM
*darn it*.. more bad news about weed :there:

surfinjo
08-12-04, 09:41 AM
Realms The problem is that governments themselves control the drugs trade so they can get extra funding for secret projects which are hidden from the public and cannot be funded by public money.

I've heard that.

The government has struck a deal with the saucer people to defeat the reverse Vampires.

Enron was the lair of the reverse vampires and Haliburton, a front for the saucer people, shut it down taking all their cash to fund a giant space ship to save the government when the comet destroys the Earth.

Meanwhile alcohol contains a special drug which means that people are fed with subliminal information to force them to vote for Bush.

And that's the reason England never wins the World Cup!

Well, I'm glad we have that one sorted.

Have another joint!