PDA

View Full Version : How your social standing directly affects your health and life expectancy


abdulhakeem
11-06-04, 01:40 PM
09 Jun 2004

Autonomy, a sense of control over your life and social connectedness - rather than actual financial resources or access to medical services - have the greatest impact on your health and life expectancy. That is the core argument of Michael Marmot's, Professor of Epidemiology and Public Health and Director of the International Centre for Health and Society at University College London (UCL), new popular science book "Status Syndrome," launched by Bloomsbury Publishing, on 7th June from 6pm at UCL, Gower Street.

"The lower in hierarchy you are, the less likely it is that you will have full control over your life and opportunities for full social participation," says Michael Marmot in the book. "Autonomy and social participation are so important for health that their lack lead to deterioration in health."

"Status Syndrome" is based on more than three decades of research by Michael Marmot that began with the Whitehall Studies in the 1970s. These showed that even among white-collar employees with steady jobs there is a clear social gradient in health. Marmot's subsequent work took him round the world as he puzzled out the relationship between health and social circumstances. From the US to Russia, from the Mediterranean to Australia, from Southern India to Japan, similar patterns emerged.

In addition, class systems are not just at play in England – they are just as bad, if not worse in Australia, America and other so-called classless societies. Studies in Sweden have shown that men with a doctorate had 50 per cent lower mortality than men who had tertiary education. In the US those in the poorest households have nearly four times the risk of death of those in the richest. In the UK, office workers are more likely to die of coronary heart disease the lower down the hierarchy they go.

Some of the key questions raised within "Status Syndrome" include: Why are the poor more likely to get heart disease, AIDS, cancer, mental illness and all of today's other common killers?

Why do Oscar winners live for an average of four years longer than their Hollywood actors?

Who experiences most stress – the decision-makers or those who carry out their orders?

Why does life expectancy rise by twenty years over the twelve-mile subway ride that divides poor black downtown Washington DC and rich white Montgomery County?

Why does Japan have better health than other rich populations of the world and the province of Kerala in southern India have much better health than other poor populations of the world – and what do they have in common?

In the Whitehall Study 11 of British Civil Servants, the higher their position in the hierarchy, the more happiness they enjoyed. This is not a quirk of the British Civil Service. Colleagues in Wisconsin looked at two American studies – and found exactly the same thing: the higher the social position the greater the level of happiness.

Michael Marmot answers these questions and more in an agenda-setting book with huge implications for social and health-care policy and the worlds of education and finance.

Contact: Alex Brew
a.brew@ucl.ac.uk
207-679-9726 University College London

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=9303

abdulhakeem
11-06-04, 01:41 PM
Social status key to a healthy life?

Jun 9, 2004

A rotten job and lack of friends can cut years off your life, an expert has claimed.

Professor Michael Marmot gathered evidence from around the world showing that the higher up the social ladder people are, the longer they are likely to live.

The rule even applies in Hollywood. A study in the United States showed that Oscar winners lived an average of four years longer than trophyless actors and actresses.

Lack of control and poor opportunities for social engagement were the two most important life-limiting factors, said Professor Marmot, from University College London.

They could be as hazardous to a person's health as a fatty diet and smoking.

Both were linked to low socio-economic status.

The most stressful jobs were known to be those in which workers have little control over what they are doing.

Being poor made it more difficult to have a rewarding social life.

Professor Marmot, one of the world's leading epidemiologists and public health experts, carried out research in the 1970s looking at how social status affected the health of civil servants.

The Whitehall Studies showed that staff on the higher civil service grades suffered fewer illnesses and lived longer.

Professor Marmot has since found similar patterns in research carried out in the US, Sweden, Russia, the Mediterranean, India, Japan and Australia.

His theories are published in a new book entitled Status Syndrome.

"People usually think it's either medical care or smoking and diet that determine lifespan," said Professor Marmot. "These things are important, but the evidence shows that they are only part of the story."

Research in Sweden had shown that life expectancy there was directly proportional to people's level of education.

"PhDs lived longer than people with master's degrees, and masters lived longer than bachelors," said Professor Marmot.

One of the starkest illustrations of how lifespan is linked to social status came from the United States, he said.

It could be seen by taking a 20-km subway ride from poor, black downtown Washington DC to the rich white suburbs of Montgomery County.

Between the start and end of the journey, life expectancy rose by 20 years. The poor blacks of Washington DC lived to an average age of just 57, whereas the average lifespan of the richer whites was 76.7.

"Position in the social hierarchy is clearly related to health, well being and length of life," said Professor Marmot. "There are two crucial factors - how much control you have over your life, and opportunities for full social engagement."

Professor Marmot said hierarchies could never be abolished from society, but it was important to be aware of how they can affect health.

He said there were four areas to which society should be paying particular attention.

These were early child development, improving the work place, developing more socially cohesive communities, and providing the elderly with more opportunities for social participation.

http://tvnz.co.nz/view/news_health_story_skin/429851%3fformat=html

ze leetle elper
11-06-04, 05:27 PM
Research in Sweden had shown that life expectancy there was directly proportional to people's level of education.

"PhDs lived longer than people with master's degrees, and masters lived longer than bachelors," said Professor Marmot.

Bah.

marjan
11-06-04, 05:54 PM
humbug?

Ebony
11-06-04, 10:07 PM
the reason y education is linked to longer life expectancy is bcz longer periods of education keep the brain stimulated, buffering against dementia and so forth (only up to a degree tho..pardon the pun :p )