PDA

View Full Version : Is photography permissible in islam?


Huda
07-02-04, 12:53 PM
Question :

ASSALAMALEIKUM
My question is : IS the taking of PHOTOGRAPHS ALLOWED,(I know drawing pictures of living things is not allowed -but what about taking photograph's of people etc.), can you supply me with some evidence please. I need this information quickly.- Inshallah.
Jaazakala khair.

Answer :

Praise be to Allaah.

Photography (tasweer) means the taking of pictures of living, animate moving beings, like people, animals, birds, etc. The ruling is that it is forbidden on the basis of a number of reports, such as the following:

'Abdullaah ibn Mas'ood (may Allaah be pleased with him) reported that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "Those who will be most severely punished by Allaah on the Day of Resurrection will be the image-makers." (Reported by al-Bukhaari, see al-Fath, 10/382).

Abu Hurayrah (may Allaah be pleased with him) reported that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "Allaah, may He be exalted, says: 'Who does more wrong than the one who tries to create something like My creation? Let him create a grain of wheat or a kernel of corn.'" (Reported by al-Bukhaari, see Fath al-Baari, 10/385).

'Ali (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: "Shall I not send you on the same mission as the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) sent me? Do not leave any built-up tomb without levelling it, and do not leave any picture in any house without erasing it." (Reported by Muslim and al-Nisaa'i; this is the version narrated by al-Nisaa'i).

Ibn 'Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him and his father) reported that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "Every image-maker will be in the Fire, and for every image that he made a soul will be created for him, which will be punished in the Fire." Ibn 'Abbaas said: "If you must do that, make pictures of trees and other inanimate objects." (Reported by Muslim, 3/1871)

These ahaadeeth indicate that pictures of animate beings are haraam, whether they are humans or other creatures, whether they are three-dimensional or two-dimensional, whether they are printed, drawn, etched, engraved, carved, cast in moulds, etc. These ahaadeeth include all of these types of pictures.

The Muslim should submit to the teachings of Islam and not argue with them by saying, "But I am not worshipping them or prostrating to them!" If we think about just one aspect of the evil caused by the prevalence of photographs and pictures in our times, we will understand something of the wisdom behind this prohibition: that aspect is the great corruption caused by the provoking of physical desires and subsequent spread of immorality caused by these pictures.

The Muslim should not keep any pictures of animate beings in his house, because they will prevent the angels from entering. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "The angels do not enter a house in which there is a dog or pictures." (Reported by al-Bukhaari, see al-Fath, 10/380).

But nowadays, unfortunately, one can even find in some Muslim homes statues of gods worshipped by the kuffaar (such as Buddha etc.) which they keep on the basis that they are antiques or decorative pieces. These things are more strictly prohibited than others, just as pictures which are hung up are worse than pictures which are not hung up, for how easily they can lead to glorification, and cause grief or be a source of boasting! We cannot say that these pictures are kept for memory's sake, because true memories of a Muslim relative or friend reside in the heart, and we remember them by praying for mercy and forgiveness for them.

Taking pictures with a camera involves human actions such as focusing, pressing the shutter, developing, printing, and so on. We cannot call it anything other than "picture-making" or tasweer, which is the expression used by all Arabic-speakers to describe this action.

In the book Al-I'laam bi naqd kitaab al-halaal wa'l-haraam, the author says: "Photography is even more of an imitation of the creation of Allaah than pictures which are engraved or drawn, so it is even more deserving of being prohibited… There is nothing that could exclude photography from the general meaning of the reports." (p. 42, see also Fataawa Islamiyyah, 4/355).

Among the scholars who have discussed the issue of photography is Shaykh Naasir al-Deen al-Albaani, who said: "Some of them differentiate between hand-drawn pictures and photographic images by claiming that the latter are not products of human effort, and that no more is involved than the mere capturing of the image. This is what they claim. The tremendous energy invested the one who invented this machine that can do in few seconds what otherwise could not be done in hours does not count as human effort, according to these people! Pointing the camera, focusing it, and taking the picture, preceded by installation of the film and followed by developing and whatever else that I may not know about… none of this is the result of human effort, according to them!

Some of them explain how this photography is done, and summarize that no less than eleven different actions are involved in the making of a picture. In spite of all this, they say that this picture is not the result of human action! Can it be permissible to hang up a picture of a man, for example, if it is produced by photography, but not if it is drawn by hand?

Those who say that photography is permitted have "frozen" the meaning of the word "tasweer," restriciting it only to the meaning known at the time of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and not adding the meaning of photography, which is "tasweer" or "picture-making" in every sense - linguistic, legal, and in its harmful effects, and as is clear from the definition mentioned above. Years ago, I said to one of them, By the same token, you could allow idols which have not been carved but have been made by pressing a button on some machine that turns out idols by the dozen. What do you say to that?"
(Aadaab al-Zafaaf by al-Albaani, p. 38)

It is also worth quoting the opinion of some contemporary scholars who allow the taking of photographs but say that the pictures should not be kept: "The angels do not enter a house in which there is a dog or pictures." (See al-Sharh al-Mumti', 2/198).

There are many bad things involved in the making of pictures. Besides the element of imitating the creation of Allaah - which is an accusation denied by many of those who make pictures - reality bears witness to the great extent of immorality and provocation of desires caused by the prevalence of pictures and picture-making nowadays. We must remove or blot out every picture, except when it is too difficult to do so, like the pictures which are overwhelmingly prevalent in food packaging, or pictures used in encyclopaedias and reference books. We should remove what we can, and be careful about any provocative pictures that may be found.

"So keep your duty to Allaah and fear Him as much as you can…" [al-Taghaabun 64:16 - interpretation of the meaning]

Photographs which are essential are permitted - such as those required for identity documents, or for identifying or pursuing criminals [e.g. "wanted" posters and the like - translator's note], or for educational purposes which cannot be achieved otherwise. The principle in sharee'ah is that we should not exaggerate about what is necessary.

We ask Allaah to accept our repentance and have mercy on us, and to forgive our excesses, for He is the All-Hearing Who answers prayers. May Allaah bless our Prophet Muhammad.

Islam Q&A
Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid (www.islam-qa.com)

abaleada
07-02-04, 11:57 PM
http://www.sunnipath.com/SearchResults.aspx?categoryidlist=153&schoolofthoughtid=2&groupid=1&catText=Pictures & Photographs&type=browse

Huja Usman
08-02-04, 11:43 AM
Taking pictures with camera is not Haram


The scholars have said this.


Making statues to be worshipped is haram. Remember all deeds starts by intention.

Taleb
08-03-04, 01:29 AM
Salamu Alaikum

The word Tasweer is arabic mean both photography and as well as painting or drawing, so considering that during the Prophet's (SAW) time camera was not invented the word Tasweer therefore refers to painting and drawing and not to photography. As we all know that photograpy is not creating anything but is jus a mere imprint of Allah's (SWT) creations where as painting or drawing is actually creating something ... but then again whether photograpy is Haram or Halal depends also on the intention of the person, thank you and ALLAH knows best

Soulja
09-03-04, 02:49 AM
There is a difference of opinion on this issue, and that must be known first and foremost before anyone gives one opinion. As Yusuf al-Qaradawi said in "Between Rejectionism and Extremism" when people were asked for Fatawa in the days of the Prophet (SAAS) they were scared to death.

Faraz Rabbani the Hanafi/Shafii scholar says that he is under the opinion photographs are haram. This opinion is shared by the "Reliance of the Traveler" and by the Salafi scholars (like Bin Baz and Albanee). Mufti Ebrahim Desai also thinks it is haram.

Yusuf al-Qaradawi, some traditionalist Sunni scholars, and some Azharite scholars say that it is not Haram. They say that the photograph is a mere capturing of the image and not under the category of "tasweer". Also ISNA and the Muslim orginizations of America do not seem to believe so either.

The fatwa online site will not pop up for the Bin Baz or Uthaymayn fatwa so i do not have that, but...

Faraz Rabbani - "...However, the opinion that photography differs from picture-making is also a position adopted by many genuinely god-fearing scholars and jurists of Islam, and is permitted (and not blameworthy) to follow. There is no condemnation or blame in matters of genuine scholarly disagreement—as opposed to aberrant or very weak positions."

Mufti Ebrahim Desai - "Picture frames and photographs of animate objects are not permissible to
display. Frames having pictures of inanimate objects e.g. trees, mountains,
etc. are permissible."

Sheikh Ahmad Kutty - "Photography as a medium of communication or for the simple, innocent retention of memories without the taint of reverence/shirk does not fall under the category of forbidden Tasweer.

One finds a number of traditions from the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, condemning people who make Tasweer, which denotes painting or carving images or statues. It was closely associated with paganism or shirk. People were in the habit of carving images and statues for the sake of worship. Islam, therefore, declared Tasweer forbidden because of its close association with shirk (association of partners with Allah). One of the stated principles of usul-u-Fiqh (Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence) is that if anything directly leads to haram, it is likewise haram. In other words, Tasweer was forbidden precisely for the reason that it was a means leading to shirk.

The function of photography today does not fall under the above category. Even some of the scholars who had been once vehemently opposed to photography under the pretext that it was a form of forbidden Tasweer have later changed their position on it - as they allow even for their own pictures to be taken and published in newspapers, for videotaping lectures and for presentations; whereas in the past, they would only allow it in exceptional cases such as passports, drivers’ licenses, etc. The change in their view of photography is based on their assessment of the role of photography.

Having said this, one must add a word of caution: To take pictures of leaders and heroes and hang them on the walls may not belong to the same category of permission. This may give rise to a feeling of reverence and hero worship, which was precisely the main thrust of the prohibition of Tasweer. Therefore, one cannot make an unqualified statement to the effect that all photography is halal. It all depends on the use and function of it. If it is for educational purpose and has not been tainted with the motive of reverence and hero worship, there is nothing in the sources to prohibit it."
Allah and his Messenger (SAAS) know best.

Taleb
09-03-04, 03:08 AM
So basically the last post was actually stating that its ok to use photgraphs of animate object as a rememberance in the sense its the photo of someone in your family (e.g. your mother or wife...etc) but if it is the picture of some hero who would eventually appreciate for whatever he or she might have done then it is not allowed as it leads to appreciating a creation of the creator that is ALLAH (SWT)?

thank you very much

Allah Hu Akbar

Soulja
09-03-04, 01:12 PM
No, the last post was just a conglomeration of opinions.

Brother, I think you can say it is unanimous that we should not hang up pictures of heros etc. (or celebrities, or people you look up to) because this is crossing the line.

Some scholars would say a photograph of an animate being, like as a rememberance of your wife etc. is okay as long as it is not hung up with the intention of revering a hero or relative.

Some would disagree.

Allah (SWT) and his Messenger (SAAS) know best.

Jazakullah wa Khayrun.

Taleb
09-03-04, 08:39 PM
Salamu Alaikum

well what i could say of what i know is the rememberance part is okay as long as the intention is clear but why i think that other scholars would disagree is just as a precaution thats all as some people with weak Iman might change and besides in some ways it is also right as because you don't want to put your wife's picture and let other men see her and or have a picture of anyone placed in the same direction as Kabaa so that everytime you will b praying you have that picture in front of u... thats y i guess the second scholars are disallowing it

but i guess its upto to one's way of doing it along with the intention

ALLAH HU AKBAR

radarblip609
08-10-05, 02:35 PM
I am looking for the answer to snaping and saving digital pictures, without printing them.

Is this allowed?

proximus
10-10-05, 11:19 PM
I am looking for the answer to snaping and saving digital pictures, without printing them.

Is this allowed?

Imam Malik stated that flat images are not harram, becasue they lack demnsion [they are flat], and that they cannot be classicifed the same as statues.

And again, it is down to your intentions.

badr
11-10-05, 08:27 AM
I take photos and videos of my son and burn them onto cd and watch them on the dvd player. I take them because when he grows up i want him to see how much he was loved as a baby and hopefully when he goes through adolescence he will remember that love!Might help keep him on the straight path insha ALLAH.

radarblip609
29-10-05, 02:40 PM
I am looking for the answer to snaping and saving digital pictures, without printing them.

Is this allowed?

Imam Malik stated that flat images are not harram, becasue they lack demnsion [they are flat], and that they cannot be classicifed the same as statues.

And again, it is down to your intentions.

I am not asking about the legality of images, flat or 3D. I am asking about digital images.
The normal photography has pictures in the physical form while the digital photography doesnt. Thats what I am asking that is it allowed?

proximus can you tell about your source about this Imam Malik's flat images' legality?