PDA

View Full Version : A lack of natural play in early childhood could be the cause of ADHD


seven
20-02-08, 02:40 PM
Are children diagnosed with ADHD simply suffering from play starvation? This disturbing possibility emerges from studies carried out in America over the past 10 years.

Scientists there have come to the conclusion that natural, unstructured play is vital to the development of young minds. This will come as no surprise to parents, nursery teachers and, indeed, anyone who has ever been a child.

Strange, then, that the Government’s new initiatives for pre-school education, as outlined in the Early Years Foundation Stage, will bring even more academic targets and less access to natural play than before.

The importance of play in child development was first suggested by scientists after one of the most beguiling discoveries of the century: that rats laugh. In the mid-1990s, Dr Jaak Panksepp, a neuroscientist, and his team noticed that their lab rats emitted high-frequency chirps when involved in rough-and-tumble play with each other.

This matched his theory that rats, like all mammals, experience a set of emotions that share a common evolutionary origin with our own. The rats’ chirpy laughter can be compared directly to the delighted shrieks and squawks of children in natural play.

Years of play research and rat tickling later, the team came to some startling conclusions. In 2003, they found that the rats they allowed to play went on to become less impulsive and more socially successful than their play-starved cousins.

Then last year, further investigation yielded physical proof: the rats who were allowed to play abundantly showed considerably greater development in the cortex of the brain, where the majority of higher mental functions originate. At this point, the links to ADHD in humans became more likely.

Although the exact physical cause of ADHD remains unknown, it has been shown that sufferers typically have 5 per cent less development of parts of their brain than other children (Castellanos & Tannock). The areas affected included the higher brain areas that Dr Panksepp and co saw being spurred on by play.

In other words, as ADHD can be described as the relative failure of the higher brain to control impulsive urges coming from the lower brain, then play, by stimulating higher brain development, may reduce the impact of a genetic tendency to ADHD.

When asked exactly what this “natural play” would look like, Dr Panksepp points to Plato’s The Republic and The Laws, in which he insisted that children from the age of three to six should be allowed to play together, as they wish, in unstructured ways, with “nurses” looking on and intervening when necessary.

This form of play, Dr Panksepp explains, allows children to discover the unwritten rules of social conduct as they make mistakes, are corrected by their peers and supervising adults and so learn better ways of relating to each other.

ADHD sufferers today, the majority of whom are boys between the ages of five and 14, are often treated with psychostimulants such as Ritalin. These are highly effective drugs that boost the higher brain and enable it to control impulses from the lower brain. These treatments are so successful one cannot help asking: “Why bother preventing ADHD if it is so easily treated with a pill?”

Parents who have had to consider the option of giving their child a powerful brain drug to modify their behaviour will tell you it is not an easy decision.

Matthew Harvey teaches in a secondary school in the South East
Read more on this story in this week's TES Magazine, out Friday February 1


http://www.tes.co.uk/2571191

dhakiyya
20-02-08, 03:22 PM
Fascinating, mashaAllah brother :up:

This fits in exactly with what I noticed when I was working as a supply teacher - in the holidays I worked as a supply nursery nurse. Most private nurseries have a lot of structured play where the kids do a lot of adult directed activities - one nursery though which was one run as a creche for a university, had far more unstructured play. When I first went there I was quite alarmed that kids were being let loose in a small concrete space with tricicles and pushalong toys (supervised by nursery nurses in the way described in the article), because the kids I'd seen at the private nurseries would not have been able to cope with that, and I thought there would be lots of collisions and lots of tears - but no... these kids were able to run very fast (for a 3-4 yr old lol) and then stop in time to avoid a collision with another kid on a trike or push along toy. And this space was really small...... clearly they had learned to control their impulses very well mashaAllah. They also had a wider outdoor space with grass and a tree and some things to climb on, and they also had a lot of free play indoors as well, in fact there were only a minimal number of teacher led activities.

one of the things I dislike about the British education system, and the attitude to many people towards education, is trying to get kids to start being academic too young - they have many vital skills to learn first before they need to start learning to read and write, and in Germany where kids start academic work earlier they catch up with the English kids and then overtake them by the time they are eleven. However the attitude that somehow kids will do better in school when they are sixteen if they do more teacher led and academic work at nursery school prevails.

It is certainly true that a good quality nursery education can improve your chances throughout life. However, thats not a matter of whether a child starts to learn to read and write at three or seven, but a matter of developing the necesasry social skills, which require that children play with other children - free play as described in the article, interaction with adults who set a good example with regards to manners, including good manners towards the children, learning how to share, how to sit and listen when the teacher reads or tells a story to them (age appropriately) - how to resolve conflicts with other children (which should be modelled by caring adults), how to test their own abilities safely, which actually kids do frequently as they play, and so on. If a child masters all the social skills in nursery, they will be able to get along in school with greater success than a child who has not learned to listen or how to get along with other children or adults.

In addition, when you have a child who wants to play, and make them sit down and do "work" - they start to hate work, and try to play more. So they play around instead of working, they try to avoid teacher led activities. Already in children of three and four years old, is a disaffection with education. I've seen this myself working in a state school nursery classroom. And the same disaffection can be seen throughout primary school and throughout secondary school. In low ability children its more apparent - as their brains develop comparatively more slowly than the average child, they stay in the stage where they need this play - idetnified in the above article as from age 3-6, but for a kid with an IQ of 80 is likely to still be in this stage when they are seven, and therefore will be comparatively more play deprived than the average child. These kids are still playing in the classroom when they are in year 10 and 11. I know, I've taught kids like this - and considered at the time whether they should have had a couple more years in nursery to be truly out of the play phase before being made to sit down and learn in that way.

What makes this all the more unnecessary is the fact that kids under six or seven can actually learn a huge amount through play if you give them the right environment and allow them to lead their own play. The montessori nursery method works on this principle. It also tailors the activities of the children to their level of development rather than a one size fits all you;re all five now so sit down and start writing.

ze leetle elper
21-02-08, 12:22 PM
Totally backs my opinion of no formal education until 7, and of course Islam has been saying this for centuries mashaallah :up:

The play in their youngers years IS a form of education and learning for the child and perhaps is more crucial to their well being and state of mind that a high exam result at the ridiculous age of 7! (I still cannot believe children are expected to live up to league tables and statistics! Totally ridiculous!)

Chained_Water
21-02-08, 12:26 PM
Sis I agree with you, I'd rather teach at home for longer also, with the incorporation of regular social activities with peers.. but wondering what your reference was for the no formal teaching until 7 being an islamic standpoint?

Work in a state school and home schooling or private schooling will seem like a very attractive alternative for your own kids. :rubeyes:

ze leetle elper
21-02-08, 12:34 PM
Strange, then, that the Government’s new initiatives for pre-school education, as outlined in the Early Years Foundation Stage, will bring even more academic targets and less access to natural play than before.


I wasn't even aware of this till recently, I was speaking with my sister and she brought it up I was so shocked! I cannot believe that the governmen really thinks that it is in the best interest of the child to have a formal set of an early years education outline, target specific to the child age 0-5, this is absurd!

I do not for any second believe that the government is interested at all in the childs needs, but instead this is all related to profits and employment. More parents need to work instead of spending time with children, the more the economy is boosted, more money for this land and more sick and deprived children, more money for the pharmaceutical industries, and bob's your uncle (and a rich man with loaded pockets!)

ze leetle elper
21-02-08, 12:38 PM
Sis I agree with you, I'd rather teach at home for longer also, with the incorporation of regular social activities with peers.. but wondering what your reference was for the no formal teaching until 7 being an islamic standpoint?

Work in a state school and home schooling or private schooling will seem like a very attractive alternative for your own kids. :rubeyes:

Oops, I was referring it to the age of when to introduce salah as a regular formal action to the child, again this is much like education in the sense that beforehand of course you child may 'play' and pretend to pray along with you, sometimes copying, but by no means do you need to instruct them to pray with you or that they 'need' to be praying at the set times.

In the same sense, a child may take an interest in books, in reading, in learning, this is fine alhamdullillah but what I mean by 'formal set education' is having to sit down everyday at a set time for a set period to 'learn.' I do not believe for a child that young that this is the most effective way in which they learn, for adults maybe, but for a child their psychology is different and this type of training and learning is not suited to their age group.

sunrise
09-04-08, 02:34 PM
:jkk: very interesting read