Which Search Engine Do You Use?

[angelgirl101]

I'm a 'Yahoo' girl myself!:D

[StickyPeas]

:nervous: iv been googled :nervous:

[ze leetle elper]

Any reputable marriage sites? :rolleyes:

[angelgirl101]

:boom: MARRIAGE

:nonono:

[seven]

i gooooogle.... haven't found any reputable marriage sites yet! :D

[ze leetle elper]

Originally posted by angelgirl101
:boom: MARRIAGE



For the lasses:

:love: :love: >>> Marriage <<< :love: :love:

For the blokes:

:freedom: :mad: >>> Marriage <<< :freedom: :mad:

[reachin'out]

whichever is handy. Sometimes Alta vista, but mostly google.

[canute]

google rocks my socks. i used to use hotbot, but google is much much better. here's a fun game, type your name in the google image search...

but when i need a pciture of a black rooster, for example, i'll find one straight away!

[angelgirl101]

Originally posted by ze leetle elper
For the lasses:

:love: :love: >>> Marriage <<< :love: :love:

For the blokes:

:freedom: :mad: >>> Marriage <<< :freedom: :mad:

:nonono:

I resent that. Tut tut.

[nam]

Sallaam

Any reputable marriage sites?

muslimmatch.com

Don't ask why i know...

And for the search engine...well it depemds on what i want to look for...if its junk then i use Yahoo...everyday use i use Google...and if i want to find something more academic or factual i use looksmart.com.au

Allah Hafiz

Nam ("Is victory the absense of defeat or the presence of the belief of victory" Nam 21/03/03)

[Ebony]

yahoo
google
alltheweb.com

Ws

[Kaiser]

Actually I use copernic, its alot better it uses all the search engines and gets the best result.

[b!ttersweet]

google
and the electronic library is good but u need a library card

[Sajeela]

I voted for
go ..............go ..............GOOGLE

[abdulhakeem]

Originally posted by angelgirl101
Which Search Enging Do You Use? The wild one :D

[ze leetle elper]

Probably the library.

There is nothing more satisfying than spending a large part of the day trawling through the aisles, reading yellowing copies of texts, out of print in 1925.

:rolleyes:

[mansoor]

google for sure, most accurate info search out on internet,

use altavista, as well,

[MalcomBanned4?]

reputable marriage sites 7320 according to google: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=reputable+marriage+sites&btnG=Google+Search ;)

[Nadia]

This site does all the searching at one hit...
http://dpcatalog.dogpile.com/texis/websearch/

[Noor]

googling mad ppl

[curiousUK]

google all the way for me...google news is brilliant too

[frizzer1]

Originally posted by canute
google rocks my socks. i used to use hotbot, but google is much much better. here's a fun game, type your name in the google image search...

but when i need a pciture of a black rooster, for example, i'll find one straight away!

Just typed my name in..results came back...it said...
You're a dirty zionist.
(maybe I've been on this board too long)

[sajid]

hey frizzer i just typed ur name out on google and every Result comes up with ur name :D

[CoolGhostAD]

Chinese Yahoo!
Yahoo!
MSN
Garfield
Google
(every type as long as it work and get what I am looking for)

[frizzer1]

Originally posted by sajid
hey frizzer i just typed ur name out on google and every Result comes up with ur name :D

We of the frizzer clan are gonna take over the world :)

[.: Anna :.]

yahoo cuz when i press home thats where it takes me :D
but for pictures i use google images

[AbuMubarak]

What's Google's Secret Weapon? An Army of Ph.D.'s
By RANDALL STROSS

Published: June 6, 2004



James O'Brien




HEY, it's not rocket science. And it's not brain surgery. But if your background is in either, you're welcome to take a shot and apply at Google. The company's employees include a former rocket scientist and a former brain surgeon.

Mostly, Google has concentrated on recruiting those with a background in what you would expect: computer science. Founded by two near-Ph.D.'s who have purposely placed Ph.D.'s throughout the company, Google encourages all employees to act as researchers, by spending 20 percent of their time on new projects of their own choosing.

As we take our seats in the Coliseum to watch the latest challenger go up against mighty Microsoft, handicappers will see that Google has two advantages, one of which it has disclosed to the Securities and Exchange Commission: washing machines are provided at the company for employee use. The other, it has not: with a Ph.D.-centered culture, Google's co-founders, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, have assembled the industry's most unorthodox portfolio of human capital since Microsoft began intense recruiting of computer science majors at top undergraduate schools in the 1980's.

Microsoft has 56,000 employees, but its research group, with 700, is separate. Google has 1,900 employees, and no separate research group, so all 1,900, effectively, are charged to "boldly go where no one has gone before" (its words). You have to like Google's chances.

Employee motivation is tied to sundry conveniences and happy stomachs, or so it would seem. When Google filed its initial public offering plans in April, it enumerated employee benefits like those washing machines, free meals and doctor visits at company offices. It warned prospective investors to "expect us to add benefits rather than pare them down over time."

Moving in the opposite direction, Microsoft said last month that it was making some minor cuts in benefits, rankling employees, who are as aware as anyone of the $50 billion sitting in the corporate treasury.

It's no contest: Google is going to win a battle of benefits, what with its on-site gym, on-site dentist and on-site celebrity chef who previously served the Grateful Dead.

Yet none of that matters, really. What trumps all else is Google's willingness to organize the entire company around the insight that top talent likes to work with other top talent, tackling interesting problems of their own choice. It's the same reason that some computer science students complete a master's degree and then persevere for three to five more years for a doctorate. It entails deep original research for a dissertation, while subsisting on a meager fellowship that allows for a celebrity chef only like Colonel Sanders.

Rajeev Motwani, a computer science professor at Stanford, says: "Good Ph.D. students are extreme in their creativity and self-motivation. Master's students are equally smart but do not have the same drive to create something new." The master's takes you where others have been; the doctorate, where no one has gone before.

Until recently, when computer science students completed their long Ph.D. training and stepped into daylight, they were treated warily by industry employers. American business has had to overcome its longtime suspicion of intellect. "Why I Never Hire Brilliant Men," an article published in the 1920's in the American magazine, is a typical specimen of an earlier era. In modern times, computer scientists are hired, but a doctorate can still be viewed as the sign of a character defect, its holder best isolated in an aerie.

Xerox famously put together a dream team of computer scientists in the 1970's, placed it on a hill in Palo Alto, Calif., and received, in short order, the modern easy-to-use personal computer and the laser printer. Unfortunately, neither the researchers nor Xerox corporate had any idea how to bring these creations to market, and the experiment was a business failure.

Steve Jobs avidly hunted and hired Ph.D.'s during his ill-begotten entrepreneurial experiment at NeXT Computer in the late 1980's, while he was away from Apple. His NeXT computer, what he called a "scholar's workstation," was marketed exclusively to students for the low, low introductory price of $6,500. It failed for some inexplicable reason to sweep campuses. He has not been heard since to boast, as he did then, that 70 percent of his manufacturing employees had doctorates. (Admittedly, these were few, as the factory was highly automated.)

[Reema]

:scratch:

[Irfan GBH]

Sheikh Google. Almost always.

[The Deen]

There's a new one. http://www.halaalsearch.com

[~Jafrene~]

:d