PDA

View Full Version : To Date....or Not, That Is The Question


khadija85
06-11-07, 01:47 PM
:wswrwb:

Dear Bros & Sis,
I need clarification with authentic evidence. What is the position of Islam on chatting online e.g. mig33, online marriage services, dating etc? I'm a new revert and I since my family aren't muslim and I hope to get married soon :insha: just need some advice.

:wavey:

IbnAbdulHakim
06-11-07, 01:53 PM
assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullah

Mixing may lead to a man being alone with a non-mahram woman, which is haraam because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: €œNo man is alone with a woman but the shaytaan is the third one present.€ Narrated by al-Tirmidhi (2165);

^ So if you chat to a man on the phone, or on MSN and NO ONE ELSE knows about it, shaytaan is in the midst :|

C.G.Jung
06-11-07, 02:18 PM
shaytaan is in the midst :|

He is?

IbnAbdulHakim
06-11-07, 02:23 PM
He is?

it means that, if you are alone with a girl, there is a higher chance of you intermingling, this intermingling could eventually lead to fornication, and islam teaches prevention before cure...

C.G.Jung
06-11-07, 02:36 PM
it means that, if you are alone with a girl, there is a higher chance of you intermingling, this intermingling could eventually lead to fornication, and islam teaches prevention before cure...

That doesn't answer why satan is there.

IbnAbdulHakim
06-11-07, 02:38 PM
That doesn't answer why satan is there.

it does, your just being too ignorant to understand it.

im not gnna be your babysitter, figure it out,


dont make me go on a rant now!! :coolbro:

C.G.Jung
06-11-07, 02:47 PM
it does, your just being too ignorant to understand it.

im not gnna be your babysitter, figure it out,


dont make me go on a rant now!! :coolbro:

What?!

IbnAbdulHakim
06-11-07, 02:51 PM
What?!

:up:

C.G.Jung
06-11-07, 03:09 PM
:up:

Right... :confused:
Do you like being rude and cretinous?

IbnAbdulHakim
06-11-07, 03:10 PM
^ i explained to you what it meant and it felt like you ignored my explenation.

Satan encourages people to do evil acts, if a man and woman is alone satan will whisper to them to do immoral acts !

C.G.Jung
06-11-07, 03:19 PM
^ i explained to you what it meant and it felt like you ignored my explenation.

Satan encourages people to do evil acts, if a man and woman is alone satan will whisper to them to do immoral acts !

He does? How do you know that? I don't hear anything.

See, you never said this before when I said "he is?".

IbnAbdulHakim
06-11-07, 03:22 PM
He does? How do you know that? I don't hear anything.

See, you never said this before when I said "he is?".

lol sorry, i'll be nicer :) !

I guess that part is faith, whenever we feel strong evil inclinations it is either from our own corrupted desires or from the whisperings of shaytaan. How do we know this? we wouldnt have if Allaah hadnt told us in the Quran.

First you need a belief in God, then the other beliefs branch out, and they all make sense :)

C.G.Jung
06-11-07, 03:44 PM
lol sorry, i'll be nicer :) !

I guess that part is faith

So anything goes.

whenever we feel strong evil inclinations it is either from our own corrupted desires

Corrupted? The instinctual desire is procreation. Instinct knows nothing the conscious concept of marriage as seen in the animal world.

or from the whisperings of shaytaan.

No different than the first. This is a disassociation where the conscious actually denies the existence of the unconscious, and claims it as being something foreign. This interaction is the Shadow (Psychology) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_%28psychology%29)

How do we know this? we wouldnt have if Allaah hadnt told us in the Quran.

So we are just going to rely on circular logic? I just can't get past this 'belief' thing. It is HARD to believe this.

First you need a belief in God, then the other beliefs branch out, and they all make sense :)

You mean nonsense.. just going by the many connotations of the word sense.

IbnAbdulHakim
06-11-07, 03:46 PM
^ stick to the basics, dont go straight for the deep stuff :up: work your way up !

first try to understand, belief in a creator, then try to understand other stuff

C.G.Jung
06-11-07, 03:50 PM
^ stick to the basics, dont go straight for the deep stuff :up: work your way up !

first try to understand, belief in a creator, then try to understand other stuff

Red Herring.

IbnAbdulHakim
06-11-07, 03:55 PM
Red Herring.

pink pig


whaat?! you did it first !

Baybars
06-11-07, 04:00 PM
:rofl1:pink pig


whaat?! you did it first !

:rofl1:

What the hell's going on here?? :rotfl:

IbnAbdulHakim
06-11-07, 04:03 PM
:rofl1:

:rofl1:

What the hell's going on here?? :rotfl:

i dunno man, he just started calling me a red herring out of the blue :eek:

C.G.Jung
06-11-07, 04:03 PM
pink pig


whaat?! you did it first !

Red Herring (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring) is a logical fallacy. It is a tactic for those who don't want to deal with the issue and detracted it by setting up a distraction.

Now what is a pink pig?

IbnAbdulHakim
06-11-07, 04:05 PM
^ you've given secular names too many existent and evident feelings and phases and then dismissed religion as something ridiculous.

So i said explaining to you would be a waste of time, i wouldnt mind dealing with it but it feels like you simply arent ready to hear about how satan plays with people yet...

Baybars
06-11-07, 04:06 PM
i dunno man, he just started calling me a red herring out of the blue :eek:

HAHA!! I don't buy you didn't get the "red herring" bit!!

Pink pig!!! That's bad bro, but it was funny as *&%*!! :D

Baybars
06-11-07, 04:08 PM
CG Jung - are you just here to create a jung???

C.G.Jung
06-11-07, 04:14 PM
^ you've given secular names too many existent and evident feelings and phases and then dismissed religion as something ridiculous.

Well, these "secular" things have been examined through peer review and other critical means. Religion on the other hand is not, in fact all religions take offence to critical analysis such as peer review. If I am dismissing religion it is based off emperical means.. but am I doing this? Where did I dismiss religion? Religion is merely a means to explain the universe, and the mind, despite being based off whim and unsubstantiated claims, I am not dismissing it, although in the rules of Argumentation Theory (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentation_theory) I could very well do so.

So i said explaining to you would be a waste of time, i wouldnt mind dealing with it but it feels like you simply arent ready to hear about how satan plays with people yet...

So you are just going to commit not only a red herring but a red herring ad hominem (personal attack)?

C.G.Jung
06-11-07, 04:15 PM
CG Jung - are you just here to create a jung???

Create a Jung? What is that?

IbnAbdulHakim
06-11-07, 04:18 PM
there have been many cases where people have come to our prophet complaining of these problems, strong inclinations to evil, evil thoughts etc etc, our prophet prescribed something for them and it worked.

i know you will use some kind of fallacy or circular logic argument against this, i guess your one of those people who wont believe unless its happened to you

Baybars
06-11-07, 04:20 PM
Create a Jung? What is that?

Jung means WAR/BATTLE in urdu.

C.G.Jung
06-11-07, 04:22 PM
there have been many cases where people have come to our prophet complaining of these problems, strong inclinations to evil, evil thoughts etc etc, our prophet prescribed something for them and it worked.

Did it work? The human mind is not reliable, nor is hearsay.

i know you will use some kind of fallacy or circular logic argument against this, i guess your one of those people who wont believe unless its happened to you

Yeah? Lately on another board I am talking to people about UFOs and their "personal" anecdotes and experiences. Should I just believe them. Humans are credulous, I prefer to be weary of credulity.

C.G.Jung
06-11-07, 04:24 PM
Jung means WAR/BATTLE in urdu.

Nope, I don't know Urdu. Jung, the one I am using, is Swiss for 'young', or similar etymology. The whole name is, C.G.Jung, is Carl Gustav Jung.

IbnAbdulHakim
06-11-07, 04:25 PM
Yeah? Lately on another board I am talking to people about UFOs and their "personal" anecdotes and experiences. Should I just believe them. Humans are credulous, I prefer to be weary of credulity.

I understand :)

when i take from the sources i take from islamic ones, Quran, Hadith etc.

I consider these to be extremely authentic...

Thats why i said you need to start from the top... if you dont accept that there is even a God how can you accept a religious system to be correct.

All this will be ridiculous to you for as long as you take that stance. And can i make you believe in God? if you dont believe in him i cant help you... just stay sincere :)

Baybars
06-11-07, 04:26 PM
Humans are credulous, I prefer to be weary of credulity.

So what are you, an Alien??? :rolleyes:

Be careful how high you climb with your intellect. The higher one tends to climb, the hard the fall tends to be.

A little humility wouldn't be a bad idea. Go clean toilets or something. :)

IbnAbdulHakim
06-11-07, 04:28 PM
A little humility wouldn't be a bad idea. Go clean toilets or something. :)

LOL and you said im bad for saying pink pig? LOL

Baybars
06-11-07, 04:30 PM
LOL and you said im bad for saying pink pig? LOL

LOL, sometimes it's just necessary bro. :D

Myabe he'll take it in!

C.G.Jung
06-11-07, 04:31 PM
I understand :)

when i take from the sources i take from islamic ones, Quran, Hadith etc.

I consider these to be extremely authentic...

Thats why i said you need to start from the top... if you dont accept that there is even a God how can you accept a religious system to be correct.

All this will be ridiculous to you for as long as you take that stance. And can i make you believe in God? if you dont believe in him i cant help you... just stay sincere :)

The implication of your god, or the Christian, Jewish, and almost all gods is staggering. This is why I yelled red herring. This thread is about mingling with the opposite sex, but you brush me off to the side, so I yelled ad hominem. These are logical fallacies for a reason, they are dishonest tactics in communication ideas.

I believe in god, but in the manner of Freud and Jung. God is a projection, just like Satan is in the context of this thread.

Baybars
06-11-07, 04:33 PM
Nope, I don't know Urdu. Jung, the one I am using, is Swiss for 'young', or similar etymology. The whole name is, C.G.Jung, is Carl Gustav Jung.

You can do a lot of Tung with a name like Jung.

C.G.Jung
06-11-07, 04:39 PM
Be careful how high you climb with your intellect. The higher one tends to climb, the hard the fall tends to be.

You are twisting the mythological motif or archetype. Babel or Icarus is not about intellect or knowledge, but arrogance.

A little humility wouldn't be a bad idea. Go clean toilets or something. :)

How do you know I have no humilty? What determines this? Humility can be used a blanket term by the religious, just like the word blasphemy. A sort of ironic term for the religious, since to be humble is to rid one self of pretension, yet making unjustified or excessive claims such as god and prophets and such is the epitomy of pretensious behavior.

C.G.Jung
06-11-07, 04:42 PM
You can do a lot of Tung with a name like Jung.

Huh?

C.G.Jung
06-11-07, 04:42 PM
This has truly gone off the rails.

Ibn Sina
06-11-07, 04:49 PM
lol this dude thinks he's a logician or somethin :rolleyes:

C.G.Jung
06-11-07, 04:56 PM
lol this dude thinks he's a logician or somethin :rolleyes:

No I don't.

Logicians deal mainly in numbers, like Kurt Godel. I am merely implementing the rules of argumentation theory for a fair and civil conversation, yet all of you are teaming up on me like a bunch of bullies. This is what argumentation theory tries to prevent.

Baybars
06-11-07, 05:16 PM
...yet all of you are teaming up on me like a bunch of bullies.....

oh...boo....hoo....hoo....:there:

C.G.Jung
06-11-07, 05:22 PM
oh...boo....hoo....hoo....:there:

Why are you crying? I'm not, but you are proving my point, and makes you look like a hypocrite when you were talking about humility.

Strange the nature of projection.

Ibn Sina
06-11-07, 06:15 PM
No I don't.

Logicians deal mainly in numbers, like Kurt Godel. I am merely implementing the rules of argumentation theory for a fair and civil conversation, yet all of you are teaming up on me like a bunch of bullies. This is what argumentation theory tries to prevent.

lol, you sound like a 2nd grader, without the verbiage and rhetoric :rolleyes:

C.G.Jung
06-11-07, 06:24 PM
lol, you sound like a 2nd grader, without the verbiage and rhetoric :rolleyes:

Such a prepubecent adolecent... go ahead and project.. you make Baybars an even bigger hyprocrite. If this is the humility of believers.. I can go without.

Baybars
06-11-07, 06:33 PM
Such a prepubecent adolecent... go ahead and project.. you make Baybars an even bigger hyprocrite. If this is the humility of believers.. I can go without.

Now Baybars al-Bunduqdari is a hypocrite, just because YOU say so? Do you know who I am???????? Have you no idea?????

I am Baybars al-Bunduqdari!!! Remember my name!!!! :torture:

Did you think you could come in here and make a show of you last college class? You assume too much, just because your teachers were somewhat impressed by your last homework assignment. I wouldn't even give your rants an E.

C.G.Jung
06-11-07, 06:43 PM
Now Baybars al-Bunduqdari is a hypocrite, just because YOU say so? Do you know who I am???????? Have you no idea?????

I am Baybars al-Bunduqdari!!! Remember my name!!!! :torture:

Did you think you could come in here and make a show of you last college class? You assume too much, just because your teachers were somewhat impressed by your last homework assignment. I wouldn't even give your rants an E.

You can't even see the irony of your own statement (I am not talking about your first two paragraphs). I guess you are not a hypocrite, your just simplyprojecting (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection).