Neurostyler
10-06-07, 12:48 AM
It is only for the very, very few who love that the married relationship has significance and then it is unbreakable, then it is not mere habit or convenience, nor is it based on biological, sexual need.
In that love which is unconditional the identities are fused, and in such a relationship there is a remedy, there is hope.
But for most of you, the married relationship is not fused. To fuse the separate identities, you have to know yourself, and she has to know herself. That means to love. But there is no love - which is am obvious fact.
Love is fresh, new, not mere gratification, not mere habit. It is unconditional.
J. Krishnamurti
Do you agree with his disdain for a marriage based on habits and cravings?
In that love which is unconditional the identities are fused, and in such a relationship there is a remedy, there is hope.
But for most of you, the married relationship is not fused. To fuse the separate identities, you have to know yourself, and she has to know herself. That means to love. But there is no love - which is am obvious fact.
Love is fresh, new, not mere gratification, not mere habit. It is unconditional.
J. Krishnamurti
Do you agree with his disdain for a marriage based on habits and cravings?